User talk:1306-rob

Trivia additions

Please don't keep adding the trivial infobox "money rankings" to tennis players. The amount the players have earned is enough. I suppose if a player is the number one earner of all-time there could be an exception, but even that is best mentioned in the body of the article rather than the infobox. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:13, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2016 Hobart International

The article 2016 Hobart International has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Way too early for this article... almost 3 months ahead of time.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:46, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Tennis at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Qualification

Your contributions at Tennis at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Qualification are helpful, but I'm afraid I'm a little confused in regards to the last two times you edited the women's table. Both times, rows have been removed from the table because en dashes have been replaced with hyphens. It's relatively easy to fix, but to anyone reading the page before it's fixed, they can no longer see certain players in the table. Someone even brought it up on the talk page, and I tagged you. I'm not really sure why it happens, but I ask that you please preview your edits before saving next time. Thanks. —Hermionedidallthework (talk) 18:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, 1306-rob. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)