User talk:144.138.236.221

Attention:

This IP address, 144.138.236.221, is registered to Telstra Internet, Australia. In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in the WHOIS report.

If you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time.

If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

August 2018[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Drone, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. In particular, please note that entries on disambiguation pages such as Drone must be actually mentioned in the target article per MOS:DAB. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:04, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Cochin International Airport. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:41, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Cochin International Airport, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 15:58, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bodies (Robbie Williams song). Serols (talk) 16:37, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah go ahead. WTH is your problem.

October 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Euthanasia in Australia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 09:17, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the piece of information you keep adding to the Euthanasia in Australia article is already there in the article in the South Australia section, properly cited and well written. You don't need to keep trying to force a sloppily written alternative into the lead. The bit about Switzerland is irrelevant. If you disagree, please raise it on the article talk page. Please stop your disruptive editing. Donama (talk) 01:19, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're the guy that created this section and told me about sourcing. Look and read. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.138.236.221 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've done your work for you. Hopefully it explains why there were so many problems with your edit. Next time try harder and try to edit constructively in the first place. Also, in case you're not aware see WP:3RR or you'll find you'll be blocked from editing. Donama (talk) 23:09, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done my work for me, pfft, yours looks pretty shit too.. What ever, block me. I know a number of other editors and admin who would unblock me or maybe block you. 144.138.236.221 (talk) 00:15, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unconstructive editing[edit]

Because of vandalism and unconstructive edits past 4th warning, I have reported you to WP:AIV. Original AIV report here timed out with no action. User's subsequent edits reverted here, here, here, here, here, here, here and an unconstructive exchange in the Talk page section above. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:44, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever...

October 2018[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. caknuck _° needs to be running more often 08:30, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

One says vandalism and one says disruptive editing. Make up your mind.144.138.236.221 (talk) 01:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing at Parliament House, Melbourne. Your are trying to insert section about a tragic but trivial event, in a poorly worded non-encyclopaedic form. --ELEKHH^T 23:00, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You stop yours. And no, this is not trivial.144.138.236.221 (talk) 22:15, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Cherif[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Cherif, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! ^{Babymissfortune} 14:25, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi baby but we don't put refs on a disamb page. 144.138.236.221 (talk) 14:33, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Teratix. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Shoulder mark, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Teratix ₵ 08:49, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Island. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please do not put text about the artificial islands in Dubai in this article without first discussing it on the talk page. Your are currently edit warring and this can lead to a block Robynthehode (talk) 10:39, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Island. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please take the discussion about the inclusion of the Dubai artificial islands to the talk page, stop edit warring or face being blocked Robynthehode (talk) 22:39, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Island shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. General Ization ^Talk 01:14, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Beverly Hills, California. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jusdafax (talk) 13:56, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Reems[edit]

Pls providde source if you want to add back the content. If not then pls do not revert the edit again.

-- CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:32, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Devil in Miss Jones, you may be blocked from editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:33, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What the heck is your problem man? He was in the military and there is a source already, go read. And as for the movie, please have a read of the article before you edit.144.138.236.221 (talk) 13:36, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Razor (nickname). Donner60 (talk) 03:54, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Its in the target article, you ignorant person.144.138.236.221 (talk) 03:56, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not only do you not explain this in your edit, you need to read about the purpose of disambiguation pages. See the note on the top of the edit page of any of these types of pages. Also see: Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks

disambig and surname pages[edit]

It seems that you do not have clear understanding wha these special list pages must contain. Since you started editing many of them, please read carefully WP:DAB and WP:MOSDAB. As you see, these are pretty long instructions for such simple pages, but they are quite logical, and you will soon get used to them. Also, please read and follow WP:BRD to save yoursekf from bei g blocked for revert wars. - Altenmann >talk 03:59, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man. Can you tell me why I am blocked? Thanks144.138.236.221 (talk) 17:50, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.