User talk:Alpargu

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Alpargu, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:30, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock please[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alpargu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not Tirgil34. PLEASE UNBLOCK ME!--Alpargu (talk) 13:42, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The evidence does not support your statement.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 14:00, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence. See below. --Alpargu (talk) 17:32, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In addition, you have stated that you have had other accounts which have been blocked. If you think that you have a good case for being unblocked then you will need to say what accounts they are, and why you think their blocking was mistaken. Simply ignoring blocks and editing with other accounts is not the way to proceed. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:12, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

These accounts have been closed before: Intelinside13core, Hárpad, Tsaigankuk.

Just because I made following statement in the wrong place at the wrong time: [1]

"The IP 96.255.251.165 aroused more suspicion by being involved in a recent Sockpuppet Investigation."

I am really tired getting every month blocked. Of course it is not the way to proceed, but what should I do? --Alpargu (talk) 16:32, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What should you do? You should either decide to leave Wikipedia or else go back to your original account and request an unblock, explaining your reasons, without any dishonesty or attempts at deception. Each time you are found to have used another sockpuppet account it becomes less likely that you will be unblocked. You should also explain why, even according to your own story, you were using two accounts at once, when neither was blocked. In addition, it might help if you can explain why a checkuser thinks your accounts are confirmed as sockpuppets of Tirgil34. I have not seen the checkuser evidence, but it is likely to mean that you were editing from the same computer. If so, and your editing was also similar, there is a good chance that you know the other editor, and can explain the situation. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:08, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you at least remove the tag "...is a suspected sock puppet of Tirgil34..." from my accounts Intelinside13core, Hárpad, Tsaigankuk, Alpargu and Alpargon? This tag is simply spoiling my reputation. It would be nice when you could replace those tags with "

Closed". 1 month later I will request an unblock for at least my major account Alpargu, how you have advised me. --Alpargu (talk) 09:26, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is what I have meant with spoiling my reputation: [1] --Alpargu (talk) 11:41, 14 December 2012 (UTC) And of course this one here: [2] --Alpargu (talk) 08:57, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]