User talk:Aqwis/Archive1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

New Video Game Article

Hey! I saw that you created a new video game related article- consider joining the Computer and Video Games WikiProject! I have added your article to the list of new articles, and attributed it to you. --PresN 18:57, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:BergensTidendeLogo.svg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BergensTidendeLogo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:35, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aqwis. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:KunnskapsDEP.gif) was found at the following location: User:Aqwis/Education in Norway. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 17:18, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:HKJA logo2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:HKJA logo2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know where you hang out lol ;) --Seth slackware 18:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Carta Marina Edited SVG.svg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Carta Marina Edited SVG.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ysangkok 21:21, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Helge Jordal

A tag has been placed on Helge Jordal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ozgod 19:38, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maps of Bergen

Great maps of the boroughs of Bergen. I have uploaded them to commons and used them on :no and :nn. By the way. You can make an internal link to an image by typing : first in the link tag. E.g. Image:Arna-map.png. Rettetast 18:22, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A small stub request...

Hi Aqwis - good to see a number of new articles on Norwegian geography. Could I ask one small favour though? If you make any more, instead of marking them with {{geo-stub}}, it'll save a bit of work later if you either add {{Norway-geo-stub}} or the geo-stub for the specific county (as listed in Category:Norway geography stubs). {{Geo-stub}} is really only used as a temporary stub type now, since all countries have their own specific geo-stub types. Cheers - and keep up the good work :) Grutness...wha? 00:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

todo in Bergen

There is a lot of great images on flickr that we can use on the Bergen article. Here is a link to images of Bergen that can be used on wikipedia. Is this a better alternative for the article. I also found this and this and this. Rettetast 22:19, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:BTLogo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:BTLogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the fair-use rationale. --Aqwis 09:10, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Norwegian schools

Thanks for your input on the Norwegian schools. I was the one who did all the original assessments of the Norwegian schools. The top and high importance assessments are all reported on the schools assessment page at Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Assessment (see the August assessments). We consider a number of factors and not just the school's age, as the oldest school in a country is not necessarily the most important. I originally assessed Oslo katedralskole as top importance, in line with our other top importance schools, not just because of its age, but because of the importance of its internationally renowned alumni. I have therefore reinstated the original top assessment which I think is justified. I found it difficult to judge ‎Trondheim katedralskole because the article was very short. The alumni were not international names and there was very little information in the existing article to tell us much about the school. A top importance rating might well be justified but I think some more content is really necessary and more information about the alumni as the claim will otherwise be hard to justify, especially as all the top importance articles are listed on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools Page. Does that seem fair? It would be great if you could help to improve some of these Norwegian school articles as they all sound really interesting. Dahliarose 15:51, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. One thing to keep in mind: the cathedral schools may be said to be slightly prestigous schools in their own city, but they certainly do not draw students from all over the country. Oslo katedralskole is not really different from any other school, apart from its reputation in the Oslo area. To be honest, I'd argue that none of the schools are important enough to justify being Top-priority! The reason why all those famous people have attended the cathedral schools, isn't because they're better schools than any other school, but because for centuries, the cathedral schools were the only schools in Norway, and the schools' reputations have continued into the modern age as schools where the "intellectually minded" gather. And since the quality of education isn't noteworthy higher at the cathedral schools than at any other upper secondary school, and isn't what draws people to the school, i'd say the alumni shouldn't decide the importance of the schools in the Schools WikiProject.
Anyway, i've cleaned up Trondheim katedralskole's list of alumni, removing less important alumni and adding a description of the remaining ones, including one king, one naval hero and three politicians whose names are well-known to almost every Norwegian. As for Bergen katedralskole, i'd say Ludvig Holberg is a pretty well-known person even internationally, given his status as the founder of modern Danish literature. Petter Dass, Michael Sars, Johann Sebastian Welhaven, Armauer Hansen, Christian Michelsen, Nordahl Grieg and Helge Ingstad are famous in Norway, but not internationally of course. --Aqwis 16:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]