User talk:ArchimedesTheInventor
Welcome![edit]
Hello, ArchimedesTheInventor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Hell in a Bucket (talk) 11:46, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright[edit]
Hello ArchimedesTheInventor, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Quern-stone have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:31, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
April 2020[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to List of Chinese inventions, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Your source does not call them an invention, this looks like your own interpretation. Doug Weller talk 05:32, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- OK, I'm fairly new at this and not familiar with the rules. What about a source says something like "X was invented in China in 100AD"? But another source gives an example in which X was found in Babylon in 500 BC, but didn't call it an invention? What should take precedence when this occurs? I thought the latter would take precedence but it sounds like you are saying the former should take precedence over the latter talk 24:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Presumably they both meet WP:RS, I'd first look for other sources. I'd also look at the dates. I'd certainly never say something was invented later than it was found somewhere. And don't forget that something can be invented in more than one place, so you can have something which was originally invented on one continent and then independently invented elsewhere. Frankly this 'invented' thing is a minefield, with so many countries or ethnic groups, etc wanting to claim inventions. Right now with its Hindutva government India is doing this. Next time "ping" me, eg {{re|Doug Weller}} but note you can't fix a broken ping, you need to start over with a new signed post. Doug Weller talk 11:43, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- OK, I'm fairly new at this and not familiar with the rules. What about a source says something like "X was invented in China in 100AD"? But another source gives an example in which X was found in Babylon in 500 BC, but didn't call it an invention? What should take precedence when this occurs? I thought the latter would take precedence but it sounds like you are saying the former should take precedence over the latter talk 24:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Chinese inventions into Erlitou culture. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:20, 24 June 2020 (UTC)