User talk:Bentogoa/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 5

Speedy deletion declined: Too Cool to Care

Hello Bentogoa. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Too Cool to Care, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Criterion A3 explictly states that "redirects are not eligible for this criterion". Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:48, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Get a clue

U clearly dont read what you revert. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.161.89.82 (talk) 16:57, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

U have two accounts.

I have only one account bentogoa Bento Fernandes 17:04, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

HI

The personal attack,was it bad?--MayhemMario (talk) 17:21, 3 April 2011 (UTC)


Look here, it was against you (in edit summery) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sam_Mitchell_%28EastEnders%29&action=history Bento Fernandes 17:25, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four halfwidth tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:05, 3 April 2011 (UTC) Hi Ben. YOU WILL BE CONSUMED by Gary Marsh if you don't allow word of his evil to be spread. You're putting the world in jeopardy! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.20.5.81 (talk) 19:16, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I've declined your speedy request as the article isn't 'nonsense' in the CSD sense. That's for stuff like 'dttryuvbuyfg ygyuyu' and totally incomprehensible gibberish. This is badly written, but can be understood. I'm going to check if it's any use, or already in somewhere else. By the way, nice catch on Harry arlington. Peridon (talk) 12:29, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:43, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Deinonychus (album)

Hello Bentogoa. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Deinonychus (album), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: criterion A7 doesn't apply as this is an article about an album and not the band; A9 doesn't apply either, as the band has an article. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:29, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Insomnia (Deinonychus album)

Hello Bentogoa. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Insomnia (Deinonychus album), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to music; and Deinonychus (band) have an article, so A9 does not apply either. May well fail WP:NALBUMS, but you'll have to consider AFD or PROD. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 12:07, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

speedy delete declined

I am declining speedy delete for Onetravel because for the spam speedy delete it has to be pure promotion that cannot be edited to make it an article. The same applies for Original Pub Company. Do not nominate articles like this for speedy deletion when they are not a pure spam. I would suggest that you read carefully the reasons for speedy delete at WP:CSD. Our mission here is to build an encyclopedia, not delete all the inadequate new stuff. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:14, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

How are those changes vandalism?205.206.8.197 (talk) 08:14, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

He likely made a mistake by selecting "Vandalism" as a criteria for reverting instead of "Unexplained Removal of Content" (assuming he was using an automated tool like Huggle). I know I used to do that all the time. SellymeTalk 08:17, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Just Started using igloo could not find "Unexplained Removal of Content" button in it, Now back to Huggle.Bentogoa (talk) 08:39, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Ridiculousness

Perhaps you should try actually checking for an explanation before you revert edits for being "unexplained." 63.104.174.146 (talk) 14:23, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Ok, Sorry about that, I overlooked Bentogoa (talk) 14:28, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Many thanks, Bentogoa, for all you do on Wikipedia—especially keeping my user page free of vandalism. Pinethicket (talk) 14:59, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the encouragement Bentogoa (talk) 15:20, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

ACC account

Requested an account on the ACC account creation interface Bentogoa (talk) 08:44, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Please explain how my edit to Death to Smoochy was vandalism. Thanks. 72.37.244.28 (talk) 17:34, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

I searched the name Elvis Stojko in all the refs could not find it. Bentogoa (talk) 17:45, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Then you didn't look hard enough. Watch the (entire) credits, his name is included (specifically as choreographing and skating as Robin Williams, presumably during the final scene). 72.37.244.28 (talk) 17:48, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

I Don't have that movie to Watch it. Bentogoa (talk) 10:43, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Then you really shouldn't be reverting the edit, and certainly shouldn't be adding unwarranted vandalism tags to my talk page. In the future, if you can't properly check referenced material, leave it for someone else. 72.37.244.28 (talk) 16:50, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Comparison of webmail providers

Hi, Why did you undo my changes to Comparison_of_webmail_providers? Only because I was to stupid to add a description of the added info, as always?

I find it's a crucial information, that there are much more powerfull paid versions - but after reading about the managerial structure of wiki on SPON I should't even care about doing anything anymore.

Regards 93.128.10.227 (talk) 06:17, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

I have undid my revert, However the info you have added is not sourced, I even checked the the mail providers home page, there is no info of any charges. Please add a summery when you add or remove information.

I did not understand what you meant of SPON Bentogoa (talk) 08:56, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Here you go: http://service.gmx.net/de/cgi/g.fcgi/products/mail/compare
If you don't see the following, I can upload a screenshot when I figure out how:
GMXFreeMail 0,- Euro
GMXProMAIL 2,99 Euro
GMXTopMail 4,99 Euro
Just ignore my SPON comment. But if you really want to know my rhetorical comment you need to read this: GoogleTranslate (I hope it's readable.) 93.128.11.103 (talk) 18:26, 18 April 2011 (UTC) Bye.

Why was my edit considered vandalism? I provided valid references. 58.106.63.43 (talk) 11:33, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

My Mistake, Reverted my revision to your & removed warning. Bentogoa (talk) 12:54, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Your request for deletion of User talk:Bentogoa/Cheatsheet

I have nominated the page for CSD per your request. WikiPuppies! (bark) 16:38, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Bentogoa (talk) 16:41, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome. WikiPuppies! (bark) 17:03, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Deleting school articles

Hi, the practice here is that school articles are not subject to A7 speedy deletion. High school articles almost always will survive an AFD. Also you used db-web, this template applies to web content. You may wish to read WP:CSD to learn about speedy deleting. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:04, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for info Bentogoa (talk) 12:24, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Revert

Thank you for monitoring wikipedia edits for vandalism and such. I just wanted to question your reverting my edit here. The title you reverted it back to is very generic and does not do a very good job of summarizing the content in the article. I realize that you are reverting a large number of unproductive edits, but I would appreciate it if you would either self-revert that or participate in the discussion regarding it on the talk page. BelloWello (talk) 21:29, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Because you change section heading to "Masturbation based scandal in the early 1980's", I mostly lookout for such words Bentogoa (talk) 21:34, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

True, but, surprisingly, that is exactly what it was. The controversy started, if you read the article, when a faculty member made comments regarding masturbation, hence I think it is best to describe what happened in the title. If you disagree, I would appreciate if you would explain your logic on the talk page, otherwise, if you would kindly revert... BelloWello (talk) 21:36, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Have done that. Bentogoa (talk) 21:42, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Cookies!

BelloWello has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Thanks! And good luck fighting vandals. :)

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Pantheon Piano Quintet

Hi there again, you have been pretty active nominating speedy delete again!. For Pantheon Piano Quintet you nominated this with an A9, however it was not a recording, but a band. I deleted it anyway using A7. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:29, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Will be careful in future Bentogoa (talk) 10:32, 26 April 2011 (UTC)


Hello again, for Indian incometax department you said it did not expand on Central Board for Direct Taxes, however if you compared the articles it does indeeed have much more content on history. Unforunately it is a copyvio of http://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/HISTORY/PRE-1922.ASP so I am going to delete it under G12. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:53, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

soul or meat

and if you are also non-believer in soul, or think that animals have no souls - so you also deserve to be butchered on slaughterhouse for meat and eaten by cannibal. Hope, christian Indians don't want to be butchered, so hope they do not support meat-eating and animal-butchering. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.94.60.98 (talk) 15:29, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

You edit was vandalism, therefor it was reverted. If you believe your edit was correct discuss why it was so. Bentogoa (talk) 16:19, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism

Many thanks! Ian Cairns (talk) 20:30, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Your welcome Bentogoa (talk) 20:30, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

In regard to your request for the speedy deletion of this page, where is the prior Articles for Deletion discussion? There needs to be one in order to justify speedy deletion as a repost. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:42, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Looks like i tag it wrong again, However this page has been deleted (by CSD) multiple times [1] [2]

Please reply

Please reply on my talk page or here before reverting. If you will continue to revert my edits witout explanation, I will request a 3rd opinion to help sort this out. Megamethamphetamine (talk) 15:20, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

 Done Have Replied on your Talk Page, and this be here so it will be archive. Bentogoa (talk) 16:05, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphan Coleophora

Hello there! Could I ask you not to put an orphan tag on Coleophora species articles I make just yet? I am going to make a list of species as soon as I am done making the species articles themselves, which should take another week or two. Thanks! Ruigeroeland (talk) 12:56, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Agree Ok, Fine Bentogoa (talk) 16:06, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Be careful with them en dashes

Your "cleanup" at Euler's pump and turbine equation changed to page number "page = 4-229" to an incorrect page range "pages = 4–229". This is the kind of mistake that is going to fuel the en dash paranoia that has emerged at WT:MOS in recent weeks. Check the linked source or leave it alone if it's not obvious. Dicklyon (talk) 14:48, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Not sure The cleanup was done using AWB, you can hardly see this change of dash. Bentogoa (talk) 16:16, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Question about the Slender Man article

Just wondering why you deleted all references to Tribe Twelve. Cougar Draven (talk) 22:56, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Looks like a mistake to me, bu it was reverted Thanks for informing Bentogoa (talk) 07:29, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

IRC cloak request

Request a IRC cloak request Bentogoa (talk) 13:30, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Requested an account on the ACC account creation interface

Requested an account on the ACC account creation interface Bentogoa (talk) 13:31, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

How is it vandalism? It's the truth! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.85.168.145 (talk) 12:39, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Note: 19:04, 21 May 2011 (UTC) Here are your edits which can be considered to be vandalism [1] [2] [3] [4] Bentogoa (talk) 19:04, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks from User:Shounak donal

Hello Bentogoa. I just wanted to thank you for the belated welcome. ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shounak donal (talkcontribs) 16:08, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Politicians arrested and charges with corruption

You are invited for discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 June 1 and also Category talk:Politicians arrested and charges with corruption- . Shlok talk . 18:05, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Samuel Aitken Vandalism revert

Just to let you know I restored the above page back to before your revert as there was another Ip that had vandalised before the one you reverted. Vrenator (talk) 15:07, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for info Bentogoa (talk) 15:09, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Vandal

He's vandalised Purple Pills and i've undone it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:212.178.154.129 Can you get the block sorted or the next warning since i don't know how. Thanks Jenova20 13:49, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

a) I am not a Admin to block him, he was blocked by a admin for 1 week. Bentogoa (talk) 13:56, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

I'm not a new editor but i'm still training so i didn't know how to go above 4 warnings and this guy is vandalising fast.
Good new that he's blocked though, thumbs up.
Thanks Jenova20 14:15, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

after 4 warnings if the vandal continues he/she should be reported to AIV [[5]] Bentogoa (talk)

Useful to know! Thanks Bentogoa Jenova20 14:35, 15 June 2011 (UTC)


Thanks

for the help on my talk page.  :) Wikipelli Talk 18:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Happy to help Bentogoa (talk) 18:27, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

I'm trying to get him

I'm trying to get him to stay out of trouble but hes not so thats why i'm trying to keep him from being suspended by Wikipedia which means the account is deleted and he needs to stop it or his account can be disabled by MediaWiki and if hes suspended from the whole entire MediaWiki site including here and other sites, he can't log in to the site and he will not be allowed to create accounts permanetly. Thats why he needs to stop vandalizing the pictures because they are small size and they are fair use so he needs to stop vandalizing the tags so that he doesn't get in trouble and suspended. But it seems to me Skier Dude2 needs to be blocked from editing for good so he can stop it and he will have to find another site to contribute there so he can't mark whatever for deletion so he needs to be delt with anyways so you need to report Skier Dude2 to Wikipedia so Wikipedia can take action about that.--HappyLogolover2011 (talk) 18:51, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

I dont know anything about Skier Dude2 or Skier Dude, If he is going against Wikipedia policies you can solve it at the reverent Noticeboard.

Telling a user to go away from wiki[[6]] is not the way Bentogoa (talk) 11:52, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism

You're welcome - keep up the good work!! Denisarona (talk) 12:56, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

IP 59.95.15.0

I have posted your request at Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Unblock. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:11, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Bentogoa (talk) 16:04, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

meany

yes, mean — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.101.19.250 (talk) 08:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

? Bentogoa (talk) 08:51, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Regarding removal content "2G spectrum..." from article "Subrata Roy"

Since the concerned matter is sub-judice, i.e. pending before court of law, any vexatious or biased comment or accusation causing damage to the image and reputation of an individual in lieu of any court verdict against the said individual, amounts to a criminal offence of Defamation under section 499 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. All persons who draft, publish, or aid and assist in drafting or publishing any such defamatory content are liable to be prosecuted in the court of law.

08:48, 29 June 2011 (UTC)~~--115.113.103.104 (talk) 08:48, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

The IP address posting the above has now been blocked for making legal threats. In addition, it has been pointed out that the "Indian Penal Code" is likely of no relevance to editors who are not located in India, nor to Wikipedia itself (since Wikipedia is not hosted in India). --Demiurge1000 (talk) 14:21, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for info Bentogoa (talk)

Also I am from India Bentogoa (talk) 14:41, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Ah, in that case I will just say, firstly, most legal threats are silly. Secondly, some parts of point (1.) made in this reply may be of interest. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:58, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Resilient Barnstar
For your contributions! Fewq567 (talk) 07:47, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

A question for Bantogoa.

Do you own a convenience store? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.205.112.182 (talk) 15:41, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Why do u ask Bentogoa (talk) 15:43, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Cuz' — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.205.112.182 (talk) 15:45, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

.....

Why did u delete my page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cammo33 (talkcontribs) 16:43, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

I am NOT an admin to delete a page, I must have tagged a page to deletion under CSD Bentogoa (talk)

Thanks

Many thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page = I really appreciate it. Denisarona (talk) 12:27, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Your Welcome, Keep up the good work of reverting vandalism Bentogoa (talk) 12:28, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks, guardian angel! Fleet Command (talk) 13:00, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the coffee Bentogoa (talk) 20:38, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

IP edits

Hey Bentogoa, I'd advise you to let that IP (178.84.115.106) be--nothing good can come out of continued interaction. I've given them a final warning (they may remove warnings from the talk page, just like you). Let's not stoke that fire anymore. Happy editing, Drmies (talk) 18:10, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

I have not reverted his removal of warning from his talk page, I had reverted his warning , which were posted on a User page (Not talk page) [7] [8] [9] and told him to post it on user talk page [10] it reverted my message saying vandal [11] Bentogoa (talk) 18:14, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Non-admin tagging

Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Administrators instructions. Non-admins should not be tagging IP addresses. They get re-used. Crude Connection (talk) 18:18, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Looks like [User:IronDuke] is NOT a Admin Bentogoa (talk) 18:19, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Ideally, all of his tags would be removed, but some of them are probably accurate. In any case he's pursuing a personal grudge, and not working to help the project. Crude Connection (talk) 18:21, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
I have asked an admin and he has confirm that a non-admin can add SPI tag to ip/ accounts Bentogoa (talk) 06:09, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

justify yourself

Does not labeling 'vandalizm' contradict the Wikipedia philosophy. Who are you to sat what is vandalized and what is not? Plz clarify? You seem to want to play God with Wikipedia! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.96.106.74 (talk) 20:14, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Read This Bentogoa (talk) 20:18, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

What if you interpret what someone says as vandalizm, when really it's a more accurate phrase than the pre-edit text? What's to stop you abusing this Power? After all you can't be an expert in everything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.96.100.5 (talk) 20:22, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

This edits are Vandalism / pov [12] [13] [14] [15] , That for anyone to see. Bentogoa (talk) 20:28, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Sure, but I was meaning in general. I assume you have no qualifications that pertain to vandalism and thus how can we be assured you don't have an underlying agenda... apart from your say so? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.96.100.5 (talk) 20:39, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Enough, this is going nowhere, your attempt to provoke me has failed, if you have any problem with my reverts take it to [16] Bentogoa (talk) 20:43, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

I'm not attempting to provoke, merely trying to determine if you are employed by/or have a vested interest in the company whose entry I was editing. That is the point I was getting at. I appreciate that you did not revert these posts also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.183.128.35 (talk) 21:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

link on Tim Bowness page

I placed a link to my website detailing my current musical activities. The link is via my name (Ian Simpson) which is mentioned as a past collaborator with Tim. It's been refused and I wondered why this has happened ? regards Ian — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.5.42.99 (talk) 11:58, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


Read This Bentogoa (talk) 12:01, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Surname nadars

refer 2 list of nadars u wil get the source — Preceding unsigned comment added by KARTYZZZ (talkcontribs) 12:22, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Where is the list ? Please provide the link Bentogoa (talk) 13:22, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

kernel

The article is about the "Linux" operating system but the numbering is only for the kernel . Alaukikyo (talk) 08:55, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Amended speedy delete reason

Hi. I amended the speedy delete reason on The Old Vic Tunnels from a1 (as the context was actually there, even if the article was short!) to a7. Cheers, Nikthestoned 16:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Bentogoa (talk) 16:30, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Toronto Argonauts

The last edit was mot vandalism. I said they were sad, well they are. They fumbled the ball on the ALs 1 yard line and gave a TD to Chip Cox. Go ALS!!! And they are led be a Lemon....Cleo Lemon. All accurate and verifyable as per Wkipedia rules — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.51.31.85 (talk) 17:45, 16 July 2011 (UTC)


Inserting an image

Sir

How to insert an image in an article  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arjun2014 (talkcontribs) 17:49, 16 July 2011 (UTC) 


1) upload the image to commons or wikipedia [17] 2) Put [Image:{name of image }] insert this in the Article where you Want to place the image.

To upload Image it should be free image Bentogoa (talk) 17:54, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your anti-vandalism efforts (and thanks for the rv. on my talk page). That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 20:16, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks Bentogoa (talk) 20:18, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Hosanna Music page

Hello.

I am Robbie Shears. i work as a producer for Integrity's Hosanna! Music. i am trying to clear up some issues and misinformation on the page. Would you please keep me up to date on any changes you make. Please email me at rshears@casonpros.com Thanks!69.247.177.67 (talk) 08:39, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

thank you and God bless — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.247.177.67 (talk) 08:36, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

You need to read WP:COI Bentogoa (talk) 08:41, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Dr. Drew

Hello Dr. Drew did fail a RFA at en.wiki, why did you undo my edits? 69.175.77.42 (talk) 07:15, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

That is not encyclopedic information . Read WP:Wikipedia_is_an_encyclopedia Bentogoa (talk) 07:18, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:22, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:56, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 08:21, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination

I see that you nominated Gold sol for speedy deletion as vandalism. The article is lacking in various ways, but the information in it is correct. I don't know how much checking you did before deciding that it was vandalism, but you should be very careful using Huggle, and not mark something as vandalism unless you are sure that it is. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:42, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for info Bentogoa (talk) 14:55, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:13, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 07:41, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 September 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:26, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

why

I am sorry to bug you but hy did you flag my article undercooked egss? i gave it all my knoledge that i have of it. if it is that i did not put any references please tell me now.

This Article has been deleted under CSD G3 Bentogoa (talk) 20:17, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

The Barrow GRoup

I was just adding new links to The Barrow GRoup entry because there was a post that said it needed more references. I am new to wikipedia and thought I was doing it correctly, but all of the sudden the page has been deleted. Please advise.72.224.40.79 (talk) 20:12, 10 September 2011 (UTC) Robert (email is rserrell@aol.com)

I do't Know what you are talking of ! Your Contributions shows this is your first Edit. Bentogoa (talk) 20:18, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

isent he cute???

Steviesmith97 (talk) 20:13, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Bentogoa. You have new messages at Causa sui's talk page.
Message added 21:13, 10 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

causa sui (talk) 21:13, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:04, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Animals/Draft capitalization guidelines. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 04:35, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Comparison of orbital launch systems. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 09:35, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 September 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:16, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 01:28, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2011


Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 06:35, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:46, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:02, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 07:47, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 08:28, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:56, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Verifiability. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 10:19, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:External links. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Survey for new page patrollers

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Bentogoa/Archive 1! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:37, 25 October 2011 (UTC).

The Signpost: 24 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 12:19, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 16:51, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 November2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 11:55, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 November 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:05, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 November 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:26, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

Sorry

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to John Wayne has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Caltas (talk) 19:30, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm really sorry about this! You're right, the warning was of course a mistake! Thanks for bringing it to my attention. --Caltas (talk) 19:40, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

sonia gandu

I do not see the attack on this page, it was just a redirect. Is the name itself in someway an attack in a foreign language? Gaijin42 (talk) 19:51, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Yes, the page was re-direct to Sonia Gandhi , I could not think of other CSD for it.

: But in what way is that an attack? Gaijin42 (talk) 19:55, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
gandu Hindi word for arsehole.
Ah. I see. Then the CSD likely does apply. I removed it but will put it back. Gaijin42 (talk) 20:02, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

George Grant article

I have repeatedly reported the abusive vandalizing of the article "George Grant" by user EducationResource. He or she continually inserts false and/or irrelevant editorial comments based on a particular ideological perspective and/or personal antagonism. Please do something to stop this abuse before restoring the article. It would be better to have no article at all than to have a false and/or antagonistic one posted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mniearl (talkcontribs) 03:10, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Now Wikipedia is God. Keep up the good work. Sven Manguard Wha? 09:12, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Ha ha, Thanks Bentogoa (talk) 09:13, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 December 2011

The Signpost: 12 December 2011

The Signpost: 19 December 2011

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

Thanks for the clarification

I have already made the necessary changes. The deletion was caused by a typo I made. My regrets for any inconvenience it may have caused. Kaitheloner (talk) 09:22, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Blazetrak repair

Bentogoa,

thank you so much for reverting my revision! I was trying to blank out a draft page in my subpages and somehow accidentally blanked out the Blazetrak entry! Huge slip-up on my part!

Thanks again! WizardlyWho (talk) 18:01, 7 March 2012 (UTC)


No Problem Bentogoa (talk) 18:01, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2012 Contest

Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.

As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.

If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.

You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.

ssriram_mt (talk) & AshLin (talk) (Drive coordinators)

Delivered per request on Wikipedia:Bot requests. 01:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC) The Helpful Bot 01:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Television episode and season articles badly needed

Based on your userbox display, I thought you might be interested in the lists at Wikipedia:Television_episodes#Episodes.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of C.I.D. episodes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of C.I.D. episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of C.I.D. episodes (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 08:50, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Invite to WikiConference India 2011


Hi Bentogoa,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

Timestamp for Archive Bentogoa (talk) 17:41, 11 Oct 2011 (UTC)

I won't vandalize again.

Okay sorry for vandalizing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OMGWTFLOLROTFLLMFAO (talkcontribs) 05:51, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

That's Good to know Bentogoa (talk) 17:39, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of CID episodes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of CID episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of CID episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.--DBigXray 20:50, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Source

Can you tell us what source is used to update the article above ? --DBigXray 20:50, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

The Source for the titles are the Videos of the Episodes itself (the title are mention in the video).

Bentogoa (talk) 21:05, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Please see WP:V, a reliable source will be needed as a reference to keep the article. --DBigXray 21:17, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

List of supporting characters in C.I.D. (TV series) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of supporting characters in C.I.D. (TV series). Since you had some involvement with the List of supporting characters in C.I.D. (TV series) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:32, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Joseph M. Papp

My understanding is that Joseph M. Papp has been forced to take legal action against cyclngnews.com and their publisher, Future Publishing - or at least formally threaten it - over the repeated dissemination of defamatory, libelous claims through their website this weeks - so the wikipedia page for him may be subject to more vandalism that I will attempt to thwart as well, to allow only for the editing of the article with sourced, factual material. Azx2 (talk) 20:50, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

I should note that these information is based on what I read at cyclingnews.com but the particular discussion is deleted. These is where the claims of defamatory libel and harassment were made. 98.236.51.204 (talk) 22:29, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Fireball (liqueur)

Hello!

We are the brand owners of Fireball - which is NOT a liqueur, but a cinnamon-flavored Canadian whisky. While we would actually prefer to have the "Fireball (liqueur)" page removed altogether, that does not appear to be possible, which is why we simply replaced the copy with "See Fireball Cinnamon Whisky." The information contained on the "Fireball (liqueur)" page was not accurate; the information on the new Fireball Cinnamon Whisky page is. Please RETURN the copy "See Fireball Cinnamon Whisky" to the "Fireball (liqueur)" page. Many thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccharters (talkcontribs) 17:21, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

I have requested an account on the ACC account creation interface

I have requested an account on the ACC account creation interface Bentogoa (talk) 17:01, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

FYI: The ACC tool requires all users to be identified to the WMF. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:09, 25 April 2013 (UTC)


Thanks for info Bentogoa (talk) 08:55, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Ichabod's Plaza

Hello Bentogoa. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ichabod's Plaza, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: seems a reasonable redirect to me. Thank you. GedUK  12:23, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

oops, thought that redirect was to self , miss the 'h' difference Bentogoa (talk) 12:25, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Mahanama College Rugby Wing

Hi. Your input on Talk:Mahanama College Rugby Wing would be appreciated. Thanks. -- Sam 🎤 08:41, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Huggle

Careful there where you are sending those warnings, lol. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:25, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of List of C.I.D. episodes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of C.I.D. episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of C.I.D. episodes (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:26, 23 January 2014 (UTC)


Oh look, another mini-mod. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GVoid (talkcontribs) 08:59, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

E!

Why delete it? they are bunch of US of A'holes & you know it....theyve made everyone outside America mad & they dont care to respond or repair the issue. You are just a trouble maker...I mean do you spend your days deleting & editing? 21:25, 17 June 2014 (UTC)~ (or whatever it is you wanted to see at the end of my comment.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.185.193.159 (talk)

Suicide of Jamey Rodemeyer

Michael73072 (talk) 00:11, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Ok , It was my mistake, have reverted it back to your edit. Bentogoa (talk) 05:54, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Bank note

The picture in the 20 Rupees bank note is Kovalam Beach. Not Port Blair. [18] 117.216.25.236 (talk) 06:01, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

its port Blair, I have a Rs 20 note in front of me, Read This [19] Bentogoa (talk) 06:05, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Yeah. I also have a 20 Rupees note in front of me :). Now Observe carefully with the image given by me. The beach in the note is a Crescent shaped beach unlike the picture you given. There is also a small land formation into the sea which is also clearly visible in the picture I given. Also the source you given is not credible. 117.216.25.236 (talk) 06:11, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

You can also observe that the light house is far from the seashore in the port Blair picture, while the light house is exactly the same distance from the shore in Kovalam picture as in the Bank note. 117.216.25.236 (talk) 06:14, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

There seems to be discussion all over internet over which one it is, But there is not a single RS, RBI does not mention which one it is, The one of Kovalam Beach looks more like it Bentogoa (talk) 06:25, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Why is Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Turtles in Time Re-Shelled on the list of games notable for negative reception

It's clear just by looking at the section the person had very little idea what s/he where doing. Even in what s/he posted on the site says that the game received mixed reviews. Just look at the scores posted with the entry, IGN 5.9/10, GameZone 7/10, Metacritic 55/100 (PS3) 60/100 (X360). Does any of this sound like a game notable for negative reception. And just so everyone is clear, I have never play this game, I have no attachment to it, the only reason I want it off is because it doesn't belong hear.

Your revert at Buccaneer Is Unwarranted

I provided a link to the author of a controversial statement whic clearly has many references. The statement does not belong there in reality. It is an attempt at revisionist history to promote radical viewpoints so I will completely remove it now. Please remember before reverting it is your responsibility to investigate thoroughly. The log shows that the time between my edit and your revert may indicate a lack of due diligence on your part. The goal is not how many edits but how one improves the project. Please seek consensus on the talk page before performing fast revert so as not to be construed as edit warring. Thanks 172.56.11.89 (talk) 11:49, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

yellowtube notice/vote

HI there, I replied to your flag, although I msut confess, I am nto sure If I did or correctly.. Did you receive it? If so, please provide me with some detail? If not, please ket me know so I can take it up here.

Thanks Louis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louisvantonder (talkcontribs) 13:53, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

hi

I am concerned by the fact that thee deems thy corrections not noteworthy when they are purely facts and recent changes, however I apologize for you misunderstanding, send your apology soon please. 11tobinn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 11tobinn (talkcontribs) 15:10, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

I died in the seventh century. Thanks to cloning that was done in Calgary much later, I was resurrected. May it happen to Jesus in your heart. Bohgosity BumaskiL 75.156.178.30 (talk) 11:39, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Radicality

Despite how my email address appears, I am actually against notability requirements on wikipedia. Lots of space is here for advertizing, although you may find it hard to link it up inside of wikipedia. If you would volunteer to flesh out out a fictional biography, then I can help you rewrite your article, here, on your talk page, or on a user page / that you create. It would help me to decide whether I really want to do that, if you were to either contribute with expansion, or undo your own reversion. In keeping with Jimmy Wale's principle that anyone can edit wikipedia, I do not like bias against IP#s. 75.156.178.30 (talk) 12:08, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

I note that you program in PHP. If you hav any ideas for my fractal gallery, then feel free to make your pitch and offer rates. Of relevance to wikipedia is my Imajinary Guide to Orijinal Research on Wikipedia. Strictly subversive, I understand. In opposition, I want a clear standard for speculation. I will not get it in astrophysics. 75.156.178.30 (talk) 17:49, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

A ship for administrators (AdminShip)

Apparently, a boat trains doctors in arts of lying about when they are on vacation (traditionally, any day of the week is compulsory for preventing workaholism). Computer off, get sun, go for run; not seven days a week, though. I do not recommend travelling on this boat, because it also seems to make them fail to believe in what they are reading, unless it is fiction. I feel like failing a doctor in English comprehension, statistics, and convicting him of attacking his own children before they are born. Daman Hongren (talk) 15:36, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Stay away from my Talk page, I am aware that u are User 75.156.178.30, Your posts make no sense to me, I reverted your edit because of this "Investigate the safety of such polypharmacy with a drug interactions tool if you please. " and more comments Bentogoa (talk) 15:55, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Sorry

Hello, I recently edited the Australian super centenarians page, but you reverted it with huggle (though it wasn't vandalism, and I believe my edits were indeed constructive). I just wanted to apologize for my rude edit description and also thank you for your understanding. Thank you for reviewing my edits and allowing them to stay.  :) Regards and all the best, 99.102.179.242 (talk) 21:34, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

WHO ARE YOU TO DECIDE?

WHO ARE YOU TO DECIDE? — Preceding unsigned comment added by FrancesClarification (talkcontribs) 14:35, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Please Read This Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources --Bentogoa (talk) 14:39, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Right.

Right. And what are your sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by FrancesClarification (talkcontribs) 14:40, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Davey Richards

Hey I just saw your message and the information that I added was correct. I'm new to this so I didn't know how to add my sources. All of that information came from Davey's DVD's (The Kevin Steen Show with Davey Richards, Versus Series Davey Richards & Kevin Steen and Davey Richards Hunt For Glory. So its from his own ommission. If you want to watch those dvds they are availible at highspots.co.uk or highspots.com depending where you live. The mention of Brutus also came from a converstion I had with Davey's fiance on twitter.

Finally as he says on the Kevin Steen Show he is a fully trained firefighter now and actually works for the fire department in St Louis when he's not wrestling for TNA. He also said that he actually had to qualify as an EMT first before being allowed to go through training as a firefighter.

That's all I wanted to say...so if you want to update this page with that information then feel free to do so if not its your decision. I always make sure my information is correct before I edit. Have a nice day

JeffAJPunkGirl (talk) 14:43, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Lg g2 mini

Dear sir or madam

First of all, thanks for writing technical specifications of Lg G2 mini on Wikipedia web page.

On that Wikipedia web page it was told that rear camera of Lg G2 mini has optical image stabilization feature. However, I've realized that rear camera of Lg G2 mini doesn't have optical image stabilization feature.

Therefore, could you modify that Wikipedia web page according to thing mentioned below, please?

Sincerely

92.44.58.89 (talk) 08:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC) Baris Turkkorkmaz

Valparai content removed

Hi, I have seen, you have removed the content from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Valparai. If you watch the same video or read the content, you will find the initiative from NGO - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWcdMjv41ho#t=14. I have nothing to do with that organisation, but I have heard about elephant attack in different region of India, and this was good initiative taken by NGO. People can watch and replicate the same solution in elephant affected zone. Request you to activate the same content for the mass benefit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWcdMjv41ho#t=14 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hemantjha (talkcontribs) 05:43, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Declined speedy

I've declined the speedy for Umbrella Man (Occupy Central Movement, Hong Kong) as there is an assertion of notability for this (it's been specifically mentioned in the news) and as such doesn't qualify for a speedy deletion. However that said, I'd probably recommend proposing merging this into the main article and redirecting there. There is quite a bit of coverage out there, but it's predominantly about the protest and at this point, it's just slightly premature to have an article. I don't think that we'd really benefit from deleting the article altogether since there is the potential for it to receive enough coverage to merit an article separate from the main protest one, so a merge proposal would be my recommendation for the next course of action. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:08, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Why do people hate Obamaa

People hate Obam because they think he is giving all our jobs to china and talking all our money but that is wrong. No body really knows were everything us going.

alright mate--Billymanjoe (talk) 13:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

I do not know why but something went wrong, Wikipedia switched from sectioin edit to page edit mode automatically. I also noticed that, and repaired it. If you like, please double check that everything is good now. -- 46.115.6.192 (talk) 14:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015

Information icon Hi. Thank you for your help with the vital work of patrolling new pages. I noticed that you are not marking some of the pages you've reviewed as patrolled. Please do remember to click the 'mark this page as patrolled' link at the bottom of the new page if you have performed the standard patrolling tasks. Where appropriate, doing so saves time and work by informing fellow patrollers of your review of the page, so that they do not duplicate efforts. Thanks again for volunteering your time at the new pages patrol project. G S Palmer (talkcontribs) 14:33, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Will do that from now onwards Bentogoa (talk) 14:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Rovi Corp

I see that you removed my post about Rovi Corp. Do you work for them? I also see that you are a fellow brother in Christ. I am just trying to keep people from being harmed. Thanks for your attention. I pray that I did not greive the Holy Spirit. I strive to serve Him (Jesus) with all my heart. Mwfrancis (talk) 14:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC) Mike

Justin Vivian Bond revert looks irresponsible

Hi, Bentogoa. Your sweeping reversions (-713?) to an article I've been working on for a couple weeks look like edit warring to me. I don't understand your motivations because you never contacted me or made an effort to explain yourself, although you had plenty of time. You also reverted some edits I had made only a few seconds before, which raises the question of how much thought you put into all this, how familiar with the secondary sources, how knowledgeable on the life of this person and transgender issues in general and the points raised on the talk page? I checked and you do not belong to either of the wiki groups interested in this article. Not knowing your motivations, your actions appear irresponsible and destructive of the wiki community, not to mention this particular article. If you are going to be careless and thoughtless in your actions then you are going to cause harm. Certainly, my feelings were hurt by your actions. The guidelines state that reversion exists to undo vandalism and should be used only when edits are clearly damaging to an article and no element of the edit is an improvement, in order to avoid driving editors away from wikipedia. This clearly was not the case with my edits, which I was not even allowed to complete. A lot remains to be done to bring this article up to date, and I would like to continue working on it with other editors of good will. Since you advise that we are free to revert any edits of yours, I will do so in this case unless I hear back from you, and I hope that in the future you will extend me the same courtesy and think twice before acting recklessly. Extrachessy (talk) 04:50, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

looks like I made a mistake, I have reverted myself, it happens when the words "Gay" is added to a page. I will try to be more careful in future Bentogoa (talk) 07:18, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi,

Please stop reverting without reading, I am not vandalizing in any way (and if the concern is about sources, I did put one, even if it is in French - I translated the corresponding passage). Bu180 (talk) 07:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

References added to Leela Samson edits

Hi, I noticed that you reverted my previous edit to Leela Samson because I had not cited references. Actually, I intended to do that in the second subsequent edit. Anyway, now I have again made a big edit that considerably expands and improves the article (including fixing typos, etc) and have cited 5 new newspaper reports (from 2010 to 2015) as references. Thanks. 14.139.38.10 (talk) 08:10, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Untitled

Hello, I'm Rizky. Firstly I didn't know about include a citation and I just see from List of American Muslims, it said about convert thing so, I edited that article. But thanks for your noticing very quick about that.Rizqts (talk) 13:26, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Grubman

I changed the intro sentence on this article, because the crime is the only reason she has a wikipedia page at all. She has no other significance that warrants any notoriety. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:9:7E00:9F4:216:CBFF:FE3A:135C (talk) 13:53, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015

Hello, you asked me about the reason for my removal of content about the Yellow badge without explanation with this edit. I didn't remove the content without explanation. However, my explanation seems not to have been fully complete or saved properly.

The reason for the removal was that the Yellow badge article is specifically about Jews being forced to wear the Yellow badge. The article is even part of a series on antisemitism. As a result, I fail to see the relevance of an article about Jews being forced to wear yellow badges to Hindus being forced to wear it during the Taliban rule of Afghanistan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enigmie (talkcontribs) 18:04, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Reviews

Hello dear i want to tell you i just want to add reviews of Baby as it will release tomarrow.But the reviews are out.So kindly let me add some reviews of notable websites.

Regards Being Human — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaib.rose1 (talkcontribs) 14:32, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

did you read or just bot-edit

this article is a lie, the sources are bogus, they are actually youtube scammers - please respond — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.247.126.9 (talk) 14:45, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

READ don't just bot

thank God you were here to protect the integrity of pages made by con artists to advertise their "services" - you think you're "helping" with the armies of bots you're running, really you are just part of the problem with this website reverting EVERY edit that isnt sourced automatically via bot? be more of a control-freak please - how many thousands of well-meaning contributors have been silenced by your knee-jerk stupidity? - get a life — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.247.126.9 (talk) 15:05, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

hey

hey the torture part was wrong , it had no truths so i had to take it off .

please don't let this lies be here — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.79.233.247 (talk) 15:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

3RR notice

User:Down Kitty has made a page protection request here. The only reason I could not block them at this moment, because to do that I had to block you too, as both of you have violated WP:3RR. Please do not make any more revert there. Contact me if you need help. --Tito Dutta (talk) 16:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Will be careful in future, Thanks for pointing it out Bentogoa (talk) 18:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Edit to Bart Simpson article

You just left a message on my talk page informing me "that [you] undid one of [my] recent contributions —the one [I] made with this edit to Bart Simpson— because it didn’t appear constructive to [you]." You then say, "If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page." So that's what I am doing. I have no idea whether you made a mistake in reverting me or not, because you didn't even bother providing an explanation in the edit summary. So I definitely have a question--why did you revert my edit? Junky One Nine (talk) 13:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

You Rejected Something Unrighteously

YOU ARE BAD

NoleyPoley99 (talk) 17:42, 23 January 2015 (UTC) NoleyPoley99

First off, be civil; calling someone "bad" isn't. Secondly, regarding this edit, adding yourself goes against the notability guidelines (even though the notability guidelines generally don't apply to article content, there's an exception to that exception for lists) and even if notable, it would go in the notable people section. Esquivalience t 17:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I just noticed your revert of my edits to this page. I am, quite frankly, removing tons of crap from this whole series of articles, and will probably merge them afterwards. I agree with you that the New York Post is an acceptable source for the one incident it was being used to support, and so is Newsday. However, I've had a lot of trouble verifying the existence of articles by those news sources cited in our articles. Both seem to have moved things around multiple times on their websites since the original URLs were added here. I have no issue - none - with properly supported material in the articles I'm editing at the moment. However, because I'm having to remove so much unacceptable material, I really need a source that is verifiable. At present, I can't verify bare URL citations to the NY Post or Newsday. If you can find those articles, or another proper source, I'd absolutely be in favor of returning that one item to the article. 209.211.131.181 (talk) 18:22, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

You Making Mistake This is one of the Biggest Revelination at Oscar

On Occasion of 87th Annual Academy Awards Launched ALePh For Great Debate On Win & Loss. ALePh is On Going Debate with 87th Academy Awards & also with many other Internation Sports & other Future Related Events ....

I am Julian Assange With Google CEO Eric Schmidt @ Google Home Shop Scotland .... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.202.241.242 (talk) 11:30, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

I've declined your A7 because he passes notability WP:POLITICIAN. MLA is a pass there, just like election to US state legislatures, Scottish Parliament etc are. Peridon (talk) 13:39, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

CSD again under G11 , the page is copy of http://www.kushnoor.in/Shri-Veershetty-Kushnoor-Biography/

Dear BENTOGOA- who are you?

Its a pity that u hide behind anonymity and delete almost anything critical of anybody! That's not Journalism- who are you, Mr BENTOGOA? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaykuru (talkcontribs) 14:00, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

You Making Mistake This is one of the Biggest Revelination at Oscar

On Occasion of 87th Annual Academy Awards Launched ALePh For Great Debate On Win & Loss. ALePh is On Going Debate with 87th Academy Awards & also with many other Internation Sports & other Future Related Events ....

I am Julian Assange With Google CEO Eric Schmidt @ Google Home Shop Scotland .... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.202.241.242 (talk) 11:30, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

I've declined your A7 because he passes notability WP:POLITICIAN. MLA is a pass there, just like election to US state legislatures, Scottish Parliament etc are. Peridon (talk) 13:39, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

CSD again under G11 , the page is copy of http://www.kushnoor.in/Shri-Veershetty-Kushnoor-Biography/

Dear BENTOGOA- who are you?

Its a pity that u hide behind anonymity and delete almost anything critical of anybody! That's not Journalism- who are you, Mr BENTOGOA? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaykuru (talkcontribs) 14:00, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

letter4u

Hello,

My recent edit in Letter4u was a modification of the picture which was put by someone else. I just resize the big image. Other change I made was adding the letter. I think my latter act seemed a bit partial to you. But picture modification is a neutral act. Can you return these part of my changes?

thanks!

Idris, the wise (talk) 10:34, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

I can't revert partly Bentogoa (talk) 10:42, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Here, have this Barnstar for conflicting my rollback of vandalism. Rider ranger47 Talk 17:02, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Kottarakara

Jonmathew14 (talk) 12:07, 26 January 2015 (UTC) I have removed some contents from Kottarakara as I found some people misused the page for portraying themselves. I am born and brought up in Kottarakara, still living there and I know each and every corner of it. There were/are several notable persons in Kottarakara, some of them are listed on Wikipedia page but someone edited it and simply added their own names/family names too beneath. When I removed it, some of them re-entered their family story and changed the heading from Notable persons to Notable Areas (?). When that also removed, some came with some new families. That I have removed today. Any inconvenience regretted.

I did not revert because of that, you had also removed the References list. Bentogoa (talk) 12:16, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Mark as patrolled

Hi!
When you tag a newly created page for speedy deletion, could you also mark it as patrolled? If you leave it unmarked, other New Page patrollers have to spend time patrolling it. Kolbasz (talk) 14:29, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

I use Huggle or Tw to tag, it should automatically mark it patrolled Bentogoa (talk) 14:31, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Maybe they should, but it's not happening here. See for example Young League Pakistan, which is still not marked as patrolled. Cheers. Kolbasz (talk) 14:35, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
I tagged that one using huggle Bentogoa (talk) 14:36, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
That may be the case, but the pages are still not being marked as patrolled. So please take the time to click the "Mark this page as patrolled" link manually. Kolbasz (talk) 22:57, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
I wiil be tagging all CSD with Twinkle, which marks the page as patrolled automatically Bentogoa (talk) 12:21, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

16:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Page deletion

Hi. I created a page that to be my musician page but you deleted it, I do not know what I can do to prove it. Please my dear! Help me to create it by yourself, please. Name of the page: Clement Soj. Create it send me "username and password" through email: clementsoj3@gmail.com or talk page. God bless you! Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clement Soj (talkcontribs) 22:53, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Reply to your message

Hey its TannerKennedy I'm replying to your message I did not mean to edit that page it was a mistake I'm sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by TannerKennedy (talkcontribs) 13:40, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Replying to your message

I really don't know what I'm doing so please forgive me if I made a mistake I did not mean to edit that article thanks TannerKennedy (talk) 13:44, 27 January 2015 (UTC)TannerKennedy

August 2014

Don't know why you removed Seri's Star Kitchen with U-Kiss (세리의 스타키친) [a show that was on KBS in 2012] from the list of Shows they have done, when they did appear on the show for 10 episodes. Kevin Eli and AJ were the main guests and all of U-Kiss appeared on the show for 2 episodes while filming their music video Forbidden Love. To say that their appearance on the show is not relevant to the page is in correct as it is relevant in that it concerns them and a show they did! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Somberofsilence (talkcontribs) 15:43, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Reply

Considering the fact that Pearl's legal name is now Pearl, and she came out as a trans woman and has been medically transitioned for quite some time now, I think it's extremely constructive to put correct information up on the website. http://craigjparker.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/note-from-porl.html

You'll probably also want an up-to-date photograph, given that her looks have changed drastically.

Or you can be transphobic and completely ignore me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.29.70.102 (talk) 14:32, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I am the director of communications at college of St. Joseph. someone is vandalizing our page, as I know you have seen.

Though you have flagged it and I have repeatedly removed their comments, they continue to add them again. is there any way to stop this?

Best, Collegeeditor22 (talk) 18:35, 27 January 2015 (UTC) James Lambert

Autopatrolled

Hi Bentogoa, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Gilliam (talk) 20:58, 27 January 2015 (UTC) – Gilliam (talk) 20:58, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Bentogoa (talk) 06:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Huggle message

Hey bentogoa! You are receiving this message because you are subscribed at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers

I have recently launched a new downloads for beta testers that contains nightly builds of huggle, eg. versions that are built every day from our master branch and contains latest huggle. These builds are currently provided only for Windows and Ubuntu. You can find them here: http://huggle.wmflabs.org/builds/

Please keep in mind that these don't have any automatic updates and if you download and start using nightly build, you will need to update it yourself! So don't get yourself to running old version, it's possible to install both stable and nightly huggle, which is what I suggest.

Keep the bug reports coming to phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniphest/task/create/?projects=Huggle Many thanks! Petrb (talk) 09:54, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Recaptcha Security

Bentogoa I was the guy that made a new introduction about McRaptil when he bypassed the ReCAPTCHA, At that time I was a member of crackingforum.com and when he did it all the guys were saying that it was impossible and fake, so he gave us image proofs and even with that images they accused and called him of been a PaintMaster, fake, noob etc...

And that´s when he did the impossible, in a Skype video conference with me included and he did it in real time, using an advanced brute-force tool named Sentry he made his own OCR configurations to ReCAPTCHA which he said that with just one word and other a proximity of the real one, it works... He did it in the Depositfiles website at the time which just after a while he had hits of real accounts been brute-forced after he bypassed the ReCAPTCHA... And to confirm even more after 3 days the ReCaptcha from Google has changed to some images..

It was a few years ago but even now if you go to, for example, Crackingforum.com or Freebie-Nation.org or others, I bet that still are some guys that will confirm all of this because they had seen it too... Just a few guys had the configuration made by McRaptil, most of them are Masters in security, but a lot of other guys knew it too because he was the first guy doing it and it was Amazing and Incredible has you could imagine....

At the time he said he sent an email to google explaining it and they never even gave him a response, they just acted like nothing happened and close their mouths about it.

That´s why I didn´t know what to put in references but I am sure that you could find it and increment this valuable information at your own and with your own writing ability..

I liked very much to read you´re ReCAPTCHA article even without this information...

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.22.18.40 (talk) 12:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Race and crime in the United Kingdom -

Dear Sir or Madam,

Regarding edits I recently made to this page, which is clearly unbalanced towards a certain racist anti-black viewpoint, why will you not allow changes?

Wikipedia clearly states:

'This article may be unbalanced towards certain viewpoints. Please improve the article by adding information on neglected viewpoints, or discuss the issue on the talk page. (November 2010)'.

I look forward to your reply.

Regards

Jamieson — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.35.144.167 (talk) 06:27, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

changing all the words from "Black" to "white" will not do that Bentogoa (talk) 06:29, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

This article makes it seems as though the only people who commit crime in the UK are black, whereas official statistics, of which this page has many incorrectly stated, clearly show the majority of crime committed in the UK is committed by white people. Since this is the case, please delete this page which is a clear attempt at defamation of the Black British community, and as such makes it liable to legal action under the UK Race Relations Act: http://www.cps.gov.uk/publications/prosecution/rrpbcrbook.html#a07. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.35.144.167 (talk) 06:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Bentogoa. jaduan

Bentogoa. i edit the page of jaudan and i am sure i described my changes and if your unsatisfied by my changes please do see the references .i removed the whole content of the page because it was too much mess to be edited properly most of teh facts provided was wrong and no history and true facts and story of jadaun people was not provided and i do beileve if you will see through my references then u will agree with watever changes i have made to your page. conatct on vikram17.singh@Gmail.com with regards vikram — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.203.76.107 (talk) 15:01, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Mahensingha

Mahensingha my edit to the page of jadaun was not an act of vandalisation if you happens to think that please see all the references and facts i have placed and check that all of them are true. the previous page from which i edited all the contect was bit harsh but trust me page was bit of mess most of the facts was incorrect and anything about the history or events of jaduan class was given in the page . even the classification of the caste was wrongfully put as mali and ahir mali are agricultural peoplle and ahir are pastoral class where as it is clearly known jadaun are chandravanshi rajputs a warrior or ruling class people lord krishna n pandavas were jadaun thakurs according to vedas and many other facts kaurali distirct was ruled by jadauns as kings of karauli even jaisalmer aligarh and mathura . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.203.76.107 (talk) 15:17, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:SELFPROMOTE

Please undo your recent Talk page comments here. My edits were constructive. They pointed to non-existing anchors and I fixed them. --82.136.210.153 (talk) 09:16, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Reverted myself and removed warnings Bentogoa (talk) 09:23, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. --82.136.210.153 (talk) 09:23, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Mihaela radulescu

Would you like to add this picture to her wikipedia ? http://i.imgur.com/B0KQYl0.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by VladutP1998 (talkcontribs) 12:14, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Premier of Ontario

Although many would agree that Fish Filet would be a better Premier!--NotWillyWonka (talk) 18:17, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi

Hi, the change made to the page "Digital India" was requested by the Ministry of Communications and IT as a private sector initiative for bringingfree internet, which is a key agenda of the entire project. Please oblige to the change.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Govtofindiachanges (talkcontribs) 08:06, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

16:31, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

Hello, My page was set for speedy deletion as I was violating your rules by creating a page about my company. I understand and apologize, however my intent was driven by existing pages of other companies, i.e. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HootSuite. Pleas, explain the difference.

Thank you.

Pavel seo (talk) 06:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Read section G11 Bentogoa (talk) 06:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi sir, I am surprised and curious why do you want to remove my Article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aayush_Rimal,_Satim_Adhikari_,_Prizam_Koirala — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josepmangai (talkcontribs) 15:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

16:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

qifang edit

Hello, below are the links and citation:

http://www.bnet.com.cn/2011/0518/2036429.shtml (BNET Business Talent Web interviewed Qifang CEO Mr. Tingbin Tang ) http://news.sina.com.cn/green/2010-11-26/151821539293.shtml (At Nov. 24th, 2010, Qifang COO Mr. Tingbin Tang gave a speech at GSLF Global Sustainable Leaders Forum hosted by United Nation)

Though the articles was in Chinese but you can use Google translate to read them.

Thanks, please approve the edit for Qifang. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.189.180.188 (talk) 23:13, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Hancock edit

I believe you made a mistake to undo my edit. I very recently watched the movie, I also watched the movie for reference to the edit. Calling Hancock a "psycho" makes no sense, but calling him an "asshole" does, because throughout the film it is shown that it is his trigger word. Also, he doesn't smile at the police, he turns around from the police and smiles at the criminal because he is planning on beating him up.

signbot on holiday ? time stamping so this auto archive Bentogoa (talk) 15:51, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I thought it would be a good promotion but did not know it was not possible. apologize. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buydrproperty (talkcontribs) 12:56, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

where do you see the use of Buk

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_2013_Rif_Dimashq_airstrike

?? = On 29 January 2013, the Israeli Air Force launched an airstrike on a convoy in Syria believed to have SA-17 BUK-M2E missiles bound for Hezbollah in Lebanon. The Syrian government denied that a shipment of weapons had taken place (An official certificate use of Buk not testify).[136]

Syria denies Israel does not confirm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.104.198.114 (talk) 15:49, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

17:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

For your information, Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive217#Warwick moss. --220 of Borg 10:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for infomation Bentogoa (talk)

Urgent help needed on the article Kumhar

Respected User, A huge traffic of i.p. users is continuously tempering with the sourced contents of the page. Their intention is merely caste promotion to which they actually belong, and it can be well verified by their conversation on the talk page of this article. They are continuously adding the self opinion based, unsourced contents removing the sourced contents. The article is continuously being de-shaped. Immediate attention and needful action is needed to protect the page. Who can understand better than you that it takes a lot of efforts to build a fully sourced article and it is not good when it becomes victim of disruptive editing just for the sake of advertising or promoting caste based ideas. Please interfere, i humbly reques-- Mahensingha (Talk) "Thanx n Regards" 14:44, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

16:28, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Hey!

Hey!!

Why have you removed it again? I have provided a source and citation. ref: Schrodingers cat - The AVB interpretation

Source: www.fliposophy.blogspot.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.201.196.140 (talk) 12:32, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

I have not removed it again, 2nd the blog is not Reliable Source see WP:RS someone else must have reverted Bentogoa (talk) 14:28, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Change descriptions

Hi, Bentogoa. I have been contracted by Strategy& to edit update their online content following the rebrand they went through last year. I believe I have been describing each change within the edit summary, however I apologize if this is not the case (this is my first time making edits on Wikipedia). I am only making minor edits so I hope it isn't too much of an issue.

Thanks, Luke

Response to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lrees4 Lrees4 (talk) 16:51, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi Bentogoa, I am only making very technical changes to the links and the brand name. I am will not be rewriting any of the text.

Regards, Luke

Lrees4 (talk) 17:22, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Bentogoa. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Disagree with your changes to Wikipedia English - Curam Software entry

This note is to politely disagree with your changes to the Curam Software entry.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%C3%BAram_Software.

The description is no longer accurate. We at IBM attempted to correct this twice by reverting to an earlier version of Curam Software entry which is accurate. You un-reverted it (twice) to the incorrect version which appears there now/today. We will revert once again, and kindly ask to talk about it prior to any further changes by you.

Shahinazc (talk) 20:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)Respectfully, shahinazcShahinazc (talk) 20:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

50 Shades of bullcrap

Why keep removing an edit to the piracy section of that film that simply is current accurate info? And if current, accurate info is removed regarding piracy, why have a piracy section at all?

just curious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.166.69.66 (talk) 16:01, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

As a lurker to the article; wikipedia should not be in the business of disseminating information that will encourage people to break the law. Posting this note will encourage some people to seek to find this torrent. In reality, there is a torrent for just about any contemporary movie. We do not go advertising that fact on each movie article. Trackinfo (talk) 19:34, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi

Creation of that template was a mistake.I was trying to delete that template.But I didn't know how to do.You deleted it.Thanks.I'm sorry that I am making mistakes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by သီရိလင္း (talkcontribs) 07:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

16:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Aam Aadmi Party

Would this be clearer if it was part of the RFC discussion above, rather than the infobox discussion? NebY (talk) 11:57, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

thanks for pointing out, moved to correct section Bentogoa (talk) 12:12, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Raheja Developers

Hello Sir, Sorry for the late response. Here I want to say that you wrote on my wall that I removed the content from the page without explanation. But according to my knowledge I mentioned the reason for edit. If that was not enough then please guide me how I can edit the page if I want to?Aarvig (talk) 07:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

15:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Isobel wylie Hutchison

I am making changes to the original English version by adding new quotations /citations. It would appear that these are automatically being translated and put on your (Spanish?) version. Please do not delete them but add them to your version as YOUR deletion has cancelled the new edits on MY version. I will try and revert to the original version. Thank you Peter DC (talk) 15:33, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

My Mistake, Have reverted myself Bentogoa (talk) 15:39, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

15:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

15:09, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

speedily deleted

Hi Bentogoa I saw that my acc is on nomination to be speedily deleted I wanted to ask why?? If you can help me beacasue I think only that I have the username "Arsenal" is the problem if it is can you tell me why?? Thank you Arsenal29 (talk) 18:53, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Julia Davis Adams

Well I had to take the BLP prod off as its not a BLP, I knew something was not right when I saw it say 1990 and graduated in 1922 so I did some research and found something! Wgolf (talk) 16:30, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

ok Bentogoa (talk) 16:31, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Delete?

Do you want me to delete this redirect Wikipedia talk:Ashish Verma? --Tito Dutta (talk) 19:05, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

yes Bentogoa (talk) 19:30, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The MfD is still open,[103] but he moved the page to wikipedia space, what should be done here ? Bentogoa (talk) 19:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
  • The closer script is not working in my account, someone will close it. it may be NAC-ed too. --Tito Dutta (talk) 19:46, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Ok Bentogoa (talk) 05:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Stephen Clarke (writer ) edit

Hello

That was the first time I have edited anything on Wikipaedia and, although I read through a number of "Help" or "what to do "pages, was/am not aware of protocol.

I looked up this author as , having read a couple of his books, I was curious. When I saw the heading on his page that said the current information read like a press-release, I thought it would be acceptable to replace hyperbole such as "ground-breaking" with more accurate "trite and derivative".

Are there any pages that show what you expect from reviews ? Now I have , hopefully, explained my reasoning, will my review be re-inseted

Thanks in advance10:25, 27 March 2015 (UTC)10:25, 27 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DRichardHale (talkcontribs)

15:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

15:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

16:40, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

15:30, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

15:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

15:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

15:38, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

15:19, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

16:12, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

15:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

15:21, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Mark as patrolled

Once again I ask you: could you please mark a page as patrolled after tagging it for speedy deletion? Thanks. Kolbasz (talk) 12:34, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

I have Bentogoa (talk) 12:36, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Abhishek santosh chaudhary, Shivam Sahu. Both tagged for CSD A7 by you, neither marked as patrolled by you. Kolbasz (talk) 12:46, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

15:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Right to Dream

Hello, I am making edits to references, which you reverted. I am pretty sure it is not against any COI, or spam or advertisement. Please let me know why you reverted it.41.189.167.58 (talk) 17:37, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

I meant to revert your single edit, as the date you had put in ref was of future Bentogoa (talk) 17:44, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.189.167.58 (talk) 17:48, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello,

I'm new to making Wikipedia updates, but I received notification that you removed my updates to The Cordish Company page because it wasn't neutral enough. Can you please explain?

Thanks! Dana — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanaWelsch (talkcontribs) 17:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Please Read neutral point of view Bentogoa (talk) 17:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Can I edit what I had already put in or do I have to start over completely? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanaWelsch (talkcontribs) 17:38, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Its best if you start from over, the contain you had added was too much promotional Bentogoa (talk) 17:42, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

I prefer to edit what I already had written. Will make it less promotional. Any way you can please send that content? I don't have it saved anywhere and it took me a long time to write.

its here [214] Bentogoa (talk) 17:51, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Ronald sullivan's wikipedia

This is his biography from harvard law schools page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.112.10.30 (talk) 14:32, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

15:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

They are not just unsourced. They are biased and incorrect, saying the SPLC is responsible for hatred against "white people and minorities alike". That's utter nonsense. Dustin (talk) 16:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

ok Bentogoa (talk) 16:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

See my comments at talk:Ledgewood Estate. You recently moved the article from user space for user:L4Harrington - maybe it was meant as a sandbox? Generic1139 (talk) 23:07, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

No, did not move it from User space, it was in wikipedia space ie. wikipedia:Ledgewood Estate , please check the history carefully next time Bentogoa (talk) 05:51, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

15:56, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

15:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

15:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

03:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

15:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

15:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

14:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

16:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

13:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

"Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Energy with this edit, you may be blocked from editing."

If you have a problem with something please indicate where the problem is. Refrain from writing mails such as above because you don't understand something. What exactly is your problem?

On this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy#Quantum_mechanics

The following was to be seen:

"In results can be considered as a definition of measurement of energy in quantum mechanics"

And since this is not correct English, I added the comment:

(this needs correcting).

And in response you made the empty claim quoted above - why?

kk (talk) 21:36, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Wrong way to put comments . see [[294]]

21:36, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Potential admin

Hi, I notice you're on Wikipedia:List of administrator hopefuls. Wikipedia would benefit from more admins. If you have been editing for more than 12 months (preferably 24+ months), and have been editing fairly consistently for the past 6 months (preferably 12+ months) with at least 100 edits a month (this tool will help) - or an explanation for any gaps, and haven't been blocked in the past three years - or a good explanation for a recent block, don't have a recent history of edit warring or arguing with other editors, feel you can explain why you wish to be an admin, can demonstrate some understanding of Wikipedia's procedures and processes, or know where to go for guidance, and are confident enough to go through a RfA, please get in touch with me. We can talk about it some more, and if all looks OK, I'll nominate you. SilkTork ✔Tea time 09:20, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

I don't have 100 edits per month , someday Bentogoa (talk) 05:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
If you do become more active, get in touch with me and we can talk some more. Regards SilkTork ✔Tea time 10:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Bentogoa (talk) 10:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

About the speedy deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because as it is a new and informative website in the field of multimedia and recently it came into existence. Moreover I am a new user so instead of deleting the page you can edit the page and make the changes which you think follows the wikipedia policies and also guide me in the same. I request you to look into the page and edit it instead of deleting the wiki page.Userwiki0308 (talk) 07:55, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Stop changing it

Stop Theman526464 (talk) 16:22, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

My Savision page

Hi bentogoa can you please confirm why my article on savision has been deleted already? prefix:User talk:Bentogoa/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattcarr71 (talkcontribs) 13:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

17:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

RahulRaj Mall

Dear, Myself Ashish & I am the marketing manager of RahulRaj mall. we have the 4,50,000 sq. ft. shopping mall which is located in Surat dumas road, Piplod area in Surat District in Gujarat State in India. Please consider my article about RahulRaj mall as actual I have posted there is no wrong or manipulated information posted their. It is a very much well known place of the Surat City where in we are hitting the 12000-15000 weekdays footfalls & on the weekends we are getting the 35000-50000 of footfalls so please do not remove this article. We only posted it for the information purpose. People have the right to get the information about our very popular Shopping Mall — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nastologic (talkcontribs) 11:13, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

16:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Elnu Abenaki Tribe

Hi there, although I agree that Elnu Abenaki Tribe is likely a candidate for speedy deletion, I did want to draw to your attention that tagging an article only a couple minutes after creation is a bit bitey and doesn't really assume good faith. This, of course, doesn't apply to things like adverts or attack pages, but generally giving a new user 10+ minutes is a good rule of thumb. --Non-Dropframe talk 14:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

18:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

HI Bentogoa,

Thank you very much for the check of the article about Monaca Software (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Monaca_(mobile_application_development_tool)). Can you please check again and let me know if the latest version requires additional edits and if so, which parts need to be changed.

Thank you very much, Una — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unaso (talkcontribs) 18:00, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

15:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Why did you revert my alphabetizing of the list? You had less than a minute to check it out. This was not vandalism. Titles that begin with "A" and "The" don't count those words. So "A League of Their Own" is alphabetized under "L" not "A". And symbols and numbers go before letters. Also, in Drama series there were two sequences of alphabetized shows. I merged them. I have undone your revert. Please actually read it before automatically changing it. 76.254.23.101 (talk) 18:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Tagging of Brynn hemphill

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Brynn hemphill. I do not think that Brynn hemphill fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because Tagged too quickly. Please see Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#cite_note-Hasty-6. I request that you consider not re-tagging Brynn hemphill for speedy deletion until the drafter has had a reasonable chance to fill it in. DES (talk) 17:13, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

18:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

16:28, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

16:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

18:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

16:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

17:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Apologise

I am really sorry for those nonsenses that i wrote. It was my friends who were playing some silly jokes on my computer. I hope you will understand.18:41, 16 November 2015 (UTC)~

19:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

20:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

16:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

17:52, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

17:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

18:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

16:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry, in Space selfie, I was using Lupin's anti-vandal tool, and inadvertently reverted your edit. It was an accident. Thank you for understanding.--LL221W (talk) 12:21, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

ok, just be careful you dont revert a revert Bentogoa (talk) 12:29, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Changes to Christopher-lee dos Santos page

I believe important to keep Mr. dos Santos' page up to date with relevant links to his work for particular clients. The links I added to his page were all viable links showcasing his film work for said clients as well as trailers for the films he has directed.

I am going to re add them and hopefully you will see that the addition of said links is only to help educate those on the work done by Mr. dos Santos.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.0.153.120 (talk) 12:09, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Stop video links for all his videos Bentogoa (talk) 12:12, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
I understand. Thank you. Have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.0.153.120 (talk) 12:30, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Changes made on page

Dear sir, regarding the message you sent me and the changes I made on the Mar Roxas page, this was not a mistake and I was about to insert my explanation before the changes suddenly changed by itself. Please allow me to revert the changes again with my explanation this time. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Squiogue (talkcontribs) 13:21, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

you removed sourced contain and added unsourced contain , i stand by my revert Bentogoa (talk) 13:45, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

17:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

16:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

21:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

18:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

16:16, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

18:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Prostitution in India

Come on, the source is right there. ⁓ Hello71 17:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

You made a big mistake go back to the kitchen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:468:CC0:1:C634:6BFF:FE64:9FA (talk) 18:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

20:12, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

20:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

18:37, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

16:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

19:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

22:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

20:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

20:40, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Website Link

Hello, I put a website link in the content, and it was removed. For more information on the program in case somebody is interested, i don't see why it wouldn't be okay to add a website link. Thanks for any help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinstriper2 (talkcontribs) 22:05, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

journalist trying to get in touch

Hi Bentogoa,

I'm a reporter with Fusion (fusion.net), trying to reach you about the Rachel Roy wikipedia page and what happens when you get a deluge of people editing at once as happened this morning. Any chance you could send me an email? I'm at ethan.chiel@fusion.net

thanks, Ethan Chiel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.86.240.185 (talk) 14:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

21:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Read the AFD

The AFD for the REactions article was redirected to the Death of Prince. Thus, the Death of Prince is a keep. This is not my decision. You cannot have a redirect to a deleted article as both AFDs were submitted at the same time. Whiskeymouth (talk) 06:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)\

you added fake keep result to the AFD with some-else name Bentogoa (talk) 06:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Look again. I added my username. The other username was so that the reader could see the original AFD decider. Whiskeymouth (talk) 06:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Let a admin close it, you are also the Article creator Bentogoa (talk) 06:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

20:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Reverted my edit

Hi, I reverted an vandalism edit on the page for Nebula (with my edit comment clearly indicating the purpose of my edit), and for some reason you reverted my edit because it "wasn't constructive"? I don't really get it. 104.151.156.163 (talk) 14:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

You reverted to vandalized copy, read before reverting Bentogoa (talk) 15:00, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

23:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

16:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

18:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your patrol.

Thanks for patrolling the websites!

After your email, I've patrolled a bit myself after your message and I've discovered that we've got some virtual vandalism going on at our school. This is a shared IP, so every change appears as ours regardless.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.33.152.14 (talk) 11:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

16:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

20:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

18:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

19:14, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

15:42, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

19:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

15:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

12:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

19:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

21:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

15:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

My Aunt Glad, Gladys Lanphere/Gladys Benjamin aka Gladys Gale

You have wrong information posted regarding one of my family members. Gladys Grace Benjamin aka Gladys Gale had NO children of her own. She died from cancer and not mysteriously.. This is hollywood fiction fodder. Please leave my comments in the document. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.231.74.108 (talk) 14:32, 14 August 2016 (UTC) 73.231.74.108 (talk) 14:33, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

My Aunt Gladys Gale wrong information

I will ask you again to please edit your inclusion of children who my Aunt did not birth. She had NO children. She also died in a motel room with cancer. I am asking you to correct this document to reflect the truth. I'm sure you would want this to be accurate and I am a relative. She has three living direct relatives. Myself, my brother and my cousin. Winnifred Landphere who became Koehler was her sister and my grandmother. I know the history of Gladys Gale as she is a family member. And I do appreciate you making a page for her. Thank you, she deserves it. Adrienne Lee Clement aka ADDIE LEE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gladys_Gale — Preceding unsigned comment added by Queenigirl (talkcontribs) 15:19, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Haidakhan Babaji was Murdered

Priyanka Sahi (talk) 15:43, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Haidakhan Babaji was murdered and all the Evidences and Proof is finally Gathered from Police, Media and Authorities- It was brought to fore by Journalist Priyanka Sahi- Do not Re Edit and Unpublish the Truth. It is Religious Fight as the Hindu Spiritual Guru was murdered by Catholic church by Poisoning him.

I have included the Sources- the documentary and even the New Gospel in which was mentioned name of the Murderer. Pl check your Wiki Email, you are not paying attention to the Citing Sources and contiguously asking me to include them, I paste the Link below for you

[Mahavatar babaji's new Gospel]

[Haidakhan Exposed movie] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priyanka Sahi (talkcontribs) 15:36, 14 August 2016 (UTC)


You are not Preventing Vandalism from happening but you are preventing Truth from being Presented - Pl check the Soures provided and allow me to edit the Wrong information of Death. His death certificate was fake and the Testimony has been recorded. Haidakhan baba did not die of Heart Attack but was slow Poisoned. The Entire Information is provided in 4 Books and a Documentary =- In my Edit i will cite the sources with Link.

Fire of Transformation by Gaura Devi

Mahant Baba's DivyaKathamrit

Mahavatar babaji's New Gospel

and

Documentary Haidakhan Exposed

Priyanka Sahi (talk) 15:55, 14 August 2016 (UTC)


I am a Journalist who worked on the Case of Haidakhan Babaji in Gathering proofs and Evidence, I would appreciate if you approve my improvements and edits with the information gathered, I would like to add an image and few links as well. I will provide all the sources and create separate section for his DEATH. i also request the reason for Death which comes in Google as Congestive Heart Failure should be replaced with MURDER. Many Thanks

Priyanka Sahi (talk) 16:52, 14 August 2016 (UTC)


The sources you are providing are OR , and do not meet RS. Bentogoa (talk) 17:10, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Please read the link provided and stop spamming the same message on my talk page again and again Bentogoa (talk) 17:12, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Haidakhan Babaji was Murdered

Thanks for Replying, I have included the Links of the Book and the Documentary movie made recently exposing the Murder of Haidakhan Babaji, I will be happy to provide the Quote from the Books if that is deemed verifiable, I will be happy to provide the details of quote and the Page number, Pl let me know if that should work?

Priyanka Sahi (talk) 17:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

the book does not meet RS Bentogoa (talk) 17:27, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Incarceration in the United States

The page compares incarceration rates in the US with incarceration rates in the USSR during the Stalin era. Such a comparison is misleading if you don't mention that millions people were executed in the Soviet Union during Stalin. You should either remove such a comparison or add a clarification saying that millions of people were executed. Similarly, you cannot compare the incarceration rates in the US with the incarceration rates during the Holocaust without mentioning how many people perished during the Holocaust. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Princetonian~ruwiki (talkcontribs) 06:36, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Waris Dirie

You reverted my edits on Waris Dirie because they "did not appear constructive"?? This woman had her son´s genitals mutilated, yet she received many honours for her "work against FGM"??! That´s hypocrisy to the extreme, please explain that! Martin Drucker (talk) 06:29, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
So you were very quick in reverting my edits, but not in answering why! I am so happy that I didn´t donate to Wikipedia, because people like you have destroyed it! Martin Drucker (talk) 06:40, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
And let me point out, that the german version of this article IS containing the quote I postet, it didn´t "appear to be not constructive" there. But people like you won´t ever answer... Martin Drucker (talk) 07:05, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Charles Dunne

Hello. Got your message about editing the page on Charles Dunne. Apologies, I am relatively new to editing and did not include explanatory comments. I see from the page revision history (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charles_Dunne&action=history) that you reverted my changes so presume you understood why I had made them. In future I will be clearer on leaving comments (and may set up an account too). Regards 193.128.202.131 (talk) 08:35, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Dick Advocaat is the new Fenerbahce manager so I don't know what's wrong with my contribution. nos.nl/artikel/2125783-advocaat-naar-fenerbahce-snap-dat-blind-boos-is.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.205.89.178 (talk) 11:27, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

19:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Boom

I have provided as many as three citations in Boom (2003 film) and almost every sentence is supported by a citation. What exactly is your objection? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.141.123 (talk) 08:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Klaus Rainer Röhl

You reverted my edit to Klaus Rainer Röhl due to "Failure to cite a reliable source"? Please explain why the source I cited, (John Christian Schmeidel, Stasi: Shield and Sword of the Party (Routledge, 2007), p. 145. ISBN 1134213751.) is not a reliable source.71.178.53.242 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:45, 17 August 2016 (UTC)