User talk:Bettylella

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Bettylella, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 15:57, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to European School may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

is an Italian singer and guitarist, founder of the Tuscan folk group [[Bandabardò]]Erriquez]. In 1996 the group won the ''Premio Ciampi'' [http://www.055firenze.it/art/102294/Bandabard-
tools dedicated to women’s professional life [http://www.isamedia.net/?page_id=18&lang=en]. ]. In 2012 she won in Brussels the Prize for ‘The most committed manager on equal opportunities’ [

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:57, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	love your Bordighera pages IsabellePines (talk) 11:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Christophe Leclercq (entrepreneur) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Christophe Leclercq (entrepreneur). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for having written to me. I don't understand where the article appears to be promotional would you mind showing me the parts where it is so? I wrote this page after reading that on the Euractiv page the name of it's founder was wrongly linked to a man with the same name. I simply wanted to correct that and add to the media's page. Bettylella (talk) 15:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article extensively uses promotional wording such as spotting opportunities to boost transparency with the nascent internet..., Very concerned by the need to provide citizens with quality information, he collaborate, etc. This sort of editorialized framing is not consistent with Wikipedia's manual of style, and doesn't even appear to have any basis in the cited sources (e.g., the citation attached to the second phrase I quoted here says nothing about Leclercq as an individual). _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have reformulated the article to be more neutral, is this better ? Bettylella (talk) 16:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to address the COI inquiry below.. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:25, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Hello Bettylella. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Christophe Leclercq (entrepreneur), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bettylella. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bettylella|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I was not directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. Bettylella (talk) 16:30, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christophe Leclercq (entrepreneur) (January 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBritinator was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christophe Leclercq (entrepreneur) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBritinator (talk) 12:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bettylella! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBritinator (talk) 12:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning TheBritinator, I am an auto-confirmed user on Italian wiki and am also active on the Fr one. English is only my 3rd language and you must be patient with my formulations.

How can you help me? 193.121.105.93 (talk) 13:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have used my smartphone for the answer. Bettylella (talk) 13:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @TheBritinator:, are there any news about this article? Thank you for your cooperation. Bettylella (talk) 16:02, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christophe Leclercq (entrepreneur) (May 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I could only identify a single source that was both independednt and reliable that discusses the subject. This article describes what appears to be a very senior, distinguished and intellectually capable individual with a complex and admirable career in Europe. However, it appears that very few organisations outside his own sphere discuss him in any sort of media. It might help if the author could point to those references (on the talk page) that are believed to support notability as defined by Wikipedia. This person surely ought to be notable, but I just can't see it at present. I would be happy to be persuaded otherwise by appropriate sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christophe Leclercq (entrepreneur) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, thank you for being open to dialogue. I wrote this article because by chance I saw that Euractiv's entry was linked to a politician of the same name (a page with only one source and which is only a stub and yet has been there since 2021). Mr. Leclercq is IMHO a person 'worthy of notice' as he is the founder of the first news website focused on EU policies and one of the most significant and influential in Europe (as you can verify by going to the article). He is considered a European media and communications expert (someone known in their field) and was appointed by EDMO and co-authored the European Commission's report on Fake news (a central document in the media sector). The sources I used seem reliable, circumstantial and independent. AEGEE is a student association, The org is independent, Re-imagine eu is a think-tank founded by ex-President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing, euronews, Le monde are all secondary sources. I could understand publishing the article with a notice encouraging people to add new sources (someone who knows the English wiki better than me could easily improve it) but banning the publication seems a bit too much. He is also mentioned in [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] Bettylella (talk) 14:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks foryour reply. The other Christophe LeClerq is a member of parliament in France and is this presumed notable even though there is only one source (please see WP:POLITICIAN). I regret that the many mentions of this Leclerq via Google books which you note above do not add to notability. If you could find a couple of sources that are independednt from Christophe and are reliable and add those to the article, it might pass muster and be accepted. Currently, the Draft isn't banned . just awaiting some reliable additional sourcing. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 07:58, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I looked for new sources, here is what I found. There is also an article in Tagespiegel, in addition to the book in German that I had already put up, which I believe demonstrates his notability at European level. I would also like to draw your attention to the fact that he is considered an expert on digital media by Edmo and the European Commission. I remain at your disposal. [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] Bettylella (talk) 11:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]