User talk:Camyoung54/Archive 4
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
New huggle 3.1 is going to be released soon
Hi Camyoung54, we are to release a new major version of huggle, but we did receive almost no feedback from our beta testing team, which you are a part of (see https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members). It would be of a great help if you could download it (if you have windows, all you need to do is getting http://tools.wmflabs.org/huggle/files/huggle3.1.0beta.exe and putting it to a folder where you have installed huggle) and test it. You can always get a help with making it @ #huggle connect!
Major changes:
- Multisite support - you can now log in to unlimited number of wikis in 1 huggle session and get a huge queue of all edits made to these wikis. This is good for smaller projects which gets overlooked often.
- Ranged diffs - you can select multiple revisions and get a huge diff that display all changes done to them.
- Fixes of most of bug reports we had so far
In case you found a bug, please report it to bugzilla: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?product=Huggle&list_id=147663 thank you! Petrb (talk) 10:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:33, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Misterioso (Thelonious Monk album)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Misterioso (Thelonious Monk album). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
LGBT fraternities
Good Afternoon, The edits that I submitted were to include organizations that are LGBT friendly that were left out of your article. I would also like to submit to add Beta Phi Omega Sorority Inc, feminine women sorority as well to — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.89.237.253 (talk) 19:12, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Your submissions do not meet the notability of others listed, as they do not have a Wikipedia article like the others. Please provide a source for the ones you would like to add to confirm their notability. - Camyoung54 talk 01:23, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Didn't remove. Just move
Someone edited the Afro Brazilian page with an American perspective. Which is incorrect in Brazil (the one drop rule doesn't apply). Also can't lump pardos in with pretos, because there are a large number of pardos without african ancestry, ie Amerindian/European mix. Therefore I expanded the pardo page by moving pardo brazilians there.NBAkid (talk) 01:13, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, seems good. Just fixed your grammar. Sorry for the confusion. - Camyoung54 talk 01:19, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
suggestions, comments
Hello, I'd be happy to have any suggestions for improving the page for Peter Zummo, which I just helped put up. It's heavily sourced and avoids any direct commentary on his work (only quotes various experts). Anything else we could do to improve it? Thanks! Swoodard2 (talk) 01:38, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not the best person to ask when it comes to creating strong articles, as I focus more on anti-vandalism. However, I would recommend researching articles on similar topics and finding editors who specialize in article creation and asking them for help, as I'm sure they would be more than willing to help improve your article. Hope that helps and let me know if you have any other questions. - Camyoung54 talk 01:47, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Cameron, Oklahoma, USA
I am a resident of Cameron, Oklahoma, USA. Everyone in and around the town call it "The pothole capital of the world." So please quit removing it without a valid reason to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hosssawyer (talk • contribs) 02:35, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- Please consult Wikipedia's policies before posting again such as WP:V, WP:NOT, WP:NPOV, and especially WP:CIV. - Camyoung54 talk 00:05, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
About Stephen A Smith
No problem just wanted to coorect about his new job on sirus xm with the mad dog last week when he left the Ryan Rucco show thats it Boruchf (talk) 03:20, 7 September 2014 (UTC)boruchf
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Ayers Rock (band)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Ayers Rock (band). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Amygdalin in apple seeds
Regarding this edit of yours, is the problem that no ref is supplied or that the cited ref does not support it? DMacks (talk) 03:39, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- The cited ref does not support it nor was there an additional ref given to support it. - Camyoung54 talk 14:11, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
With regards to the edit you made. I am not entirely sure as to how to properly add citations on wikipedia articles. However, as requested here are journal articles and government publications discussing the amygdalin content of certain fruits:
Food Chemistry. 152, 1 June 2014, Pages 133–139.
Journal of Food chemistry online article: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308814614013077
New Zealand Food Safety Authority: http://www.foodsafety.govt.nz/elibrary/industry/Cyanogenic_Glycosides-Toxin_Which.pdf
Could you please do the edit for me and reference it accordingly? Thanks. 46.7.57.131 (talk) 14:21, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Nevermind. I have it figured out. I have used the first journal as reference. Feel free to edit if my format was incorrect. Cheers. 46.7.57.131 (talk) 14:39, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- All set, thanks for finding a source! - Camyoung54 talk 01:09, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
I beg you, please update Globalization Index
Please do update Globalization Index--86.3.42.147 (talk) 01:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Thank you!
|
Thank you for reverting the vandalism to Spite (punk band). For some reason this article has been the target of an exceptional amount of vandalism. Kzooman (talk) 19:08, 12 September 2014 (UTC) |
Globalisation index 2014
Please do update the Globalisation index--86.3.42.147 (talk) 17:03, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Jose Brocca article
Thank you for undoing the stupid and childish comments inserted by 911ace into the article about Jose Brocca. Your work for the true values of Wikipedia is certainly appreciated. Best wishes from Wales. Locospotter2 (talk) 21:01, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:2014–15 UEFA Champions League
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2014–15 UEFA Champions League. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:12, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:40, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Talk page layout
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Talk page layout. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:13, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of deprogrammers
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of deprogrammers. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Wikimedia sister projects
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Wikimedia sister projects. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:53, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews
Hello Camyoung54. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.
The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.
If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)
If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.
Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.
I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).
Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)