User talk:Canterbury Tail/Archive 8

this ip

this is a shared IP in an office, not sure who the vandal is but we will find them and subject them to disciplinary proceedings. please do not block. thanks. George Sanderson 217.45.222.60 (talk) 14:56, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Lulu article

Hi, you deleted the reference to Lulu hiding information from customers claiming that the company's PDF requirements are explicit. Your claim that PDF formats aren't equal may be true but it's unlikely most potential Lulu customers will know this. Can you please explain where during Lulu's publishing process customers are informed? The only item I've found is buried in their help section and that lacks detail. A customer would only read the help section if they need help. Lulu has refused refunds from customers affected despite the lack of guidance on their part so it's noteworthy if the wikipedia item is to fairly outline how the company operates. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.38.66.67 (talk) 16:28, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

If you have an axe to grind against Lulu then I suggest you take it elsewhere, Wikipedia is not a soapbox. The information is all very clearly available on the Lulu site, all shown when you take the walkthroughs. People should read the Lulu site and guidelines before submitting their work. You shouldn't be just creating an PDF using software that isn't actually 100% to the PDF standards, and submitting it, you should be reading the instructions and guidelines first. Canterbury Tail talk 16:53, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Hezbolla rally

Why did you delete the photo of Hezbolla rally? Isn't it part of Canada's politics. Those people are Canadians, and they took to the streets with very clear political slogans.Keverich1 (talk) 18:38, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Sock (Ovlem / Wikipéire etc)

I've added another suspicious user to the sock case.Traditional unionist (talk) 13:53, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

I've taken the liberty of adding "(Ovlem / Wikipéire etc)" to the heading here, as there are two crossing SSP's going on.

I've added the line "See also: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Wikipéire_(3rd)#User:Wikipéire (to avoid duplication)" to the top of the SSP case, Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Ovlem#User:Ovlem. I'm not sure what is done when two cases are going on and they both clearly have the same puppet master, although it must happen quite a lot.

All the 'Ovlem' cases started just after I posed the case of User:Pureditor being User:Wikipéire. Intead of responding to the case against him he seems to have just created a bunch of new accounts. I personally think that socking by this one person has gone back years.--Matt Lewis (talk) 17:26, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Derry/Londonderry I don't know how to work this so I will do it this way. What is wrong with Londonderry after all Londonderry is the official name of the city and not Derry. Therefore you should be removing Derry and replacing it with Londonderry. I think Derry/Londonderry works for everyone but some bigots like you won't let that happen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iantaylor102 (talk • contribs) 18:14, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Other editor 3RR

Hi User:Mooretwin has broken the 3RR rule on History of Ireland dispite warning. You're an admin, could you take the necessary action? Thanks194.125.103.152 (talk) 11:34, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Ref your block of User:Mooretwin. I've looked at the page history concerned and can see clearly that all he was doing was reverting to the consensus version of the page as other users tried to change wording to their POV, particularly over the use of Ireland and Republic of Ireland. A lengthy discussion on the Republic of Ireland disambigation has been going on in the meantime ( which Mooretwin has been involved in) and these other editors have been pre-empting any agreement by changing things. It is my firm belief that User:Mooretwin is being punished for defending Wikipedia guidelines and policy. The Thunderer (talk) 12:21, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

I respectfully draw your attention here to Mooretwin's comments on the Flag of Ireland issue which you have blocked him for. The only fair thing to do on this occasion in my opinion is to unblock the editor. The Thunderer (talk) 13:55, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

This editor has requested an unblock, and has been declined (twice). I defer to you as the blocking admin, but am hoping that the user will discuss the matter in a way that might make an unblock possible - but, again, I'm not going to unblock before hearing from you. Just an FYI that discussion is ongoing. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 18:47, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

The editor has acknowledged the mistake, and I'm discussing possible solutions with him now - and, if you're satisfied with his responses, I'd propose unblocking. Discussion is ongoing at User talk:Mooretwin. Thanks, UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 19:37, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying your position with regard to this user. Quite honestly, I think your statement will be of benefit once the user is unblocked. Maybe. In any event, thanks for giving it some thought. Best, UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 04:19, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Unblock

Hi, Could you plese unblock the pages at Flag of Ireland , History of Ireland and Great Britain at the Olympics? We have consensus at all of them. You could also unblock Ireland at the Olympics too, consensus hasn't been agreed yet, but it's not too far away. Thanks.ThatsGrand (talk) 13:18, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

I don't see enough discussion to indicate a consensus on those issues. Anyway it was protected due to disruptive editing and warring, and there is no indication that that has gone away. Yes one of the users involved has been mass blocked for Sockpuppetry, but they may still return. The protection is only for a week, so we'll see how it goes. Canterbury Tail talk 13:48, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Ulster Special Constabulary

Hi Ben, what are you up to over at USC? You made some changes then self reverted. Is there anything you would like to discuss on the talk page? The Thunderer (talk) 15:04, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

I reverted an earlier edit, but didn't realise there had been others. Irish War of Independance was changed from Anglo-Irish War, which I was changing back. It still needs to be changed as UK article should use UK phrasing. Canterbury Tail talk 15:24, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

It's a moot point but I didn't revert it because Ireland was still one country during the Anglo-Irish War. I'll leave it up to you what to do, I'm happy either way. The Thunderer (talk) 15:33, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

I never claimed you did revert it, I know you didn't it was another user. I self reverted because I accidentally undid a lot of other edits at the same time. As for it being one country, yes it was, but it was a British one and part of the UK. It's a grey area though I suspect. Canterbury Tail talk 15:34, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

I think you've picked me up wrong there. What I meant was; I had noticed it being changed to "Irish War of Independence" but chose not to revert because I didn't have a viewpoint. I didn't think you were accusing me of reverting lol. Getting back to the subject matter - it's up to you. I don't want to revert anything which might be contentious, I've had enough of that recently ;) The Thunderer (talk) 15:37, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Right, gotcha. Slow today, home from work sick. Canterbury Tail talk 15:39, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

I've been awaiting the arrival of the dishwasher engineer. He's here now so I've got him washing the dishes. The Thunderer (talk) 15:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

:)Canterbury Tail talk 15:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Please explain how I "attacked" you? I posted a fact based reply to one of the points of discussion on your talk page. You then deleted it with the explanation "RV: rant". I reinstated it with the explanation "Not a rant, rather a fact based response to the previous discussion". There was no vandalism, no attack, no reason for you to react this way. Again, I ask you to explain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BFC1890 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

samurai page

I am placing material on the talk page for review, before it is incorporated in the article. this is done as a courtesy to others instead of just making the changes with no debate. A list of samurai related links was listed so that people can educate themselves before making changes to the article which contradict real history.

Reason for section on Hurst: some "expert" on the samurai talk page introduced himself as "doctoral candidate of japanese history" with "fluency in classical japanese" then proceeded to cite Hurst's flawed 1990 articleDeath, Honor, and Loyalty: The Bushido Ideal as the basis for his arguments. This "expert" then proceeds to tell me how there was no ideal of "Bun By Ryo Do" (pen and sword in accord) in indigenous Japanese literature. If this "expert" was fluent in Japanese, why did he not know that The word Bushi (pronounced "samurai or bushi") itself is composed of the letters for Bun and Bu and signifies a balanced state. what a moron. i do not need "expert" help like this. Not only did the person not know Japanese history, he falsified his credentials! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.176.40.77 (talk) 05:28, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Hello, you deleted my Site Press page

And I obviously am not understanding your reasons for doing so. There is nothing promotional about it. There are also no copyright violations, as all the content was 100% original with me as of this morning. If you were to do a compare of the text with any published source you would not be able to demonstrate a single duplicate passage. Site Press is a registered trademark with common-law usage trademark protections as well, so third party copyright infringement is not possible either.

Is the problem that I am with the company that created the product? Would it be better if I were to have a third party create the article? We have many customers who would do so.

Because otherwise, subjects such as Microsoft Word and Drupal don't deserve articles either. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djmac308 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

The article was added and came across as obvious advertising for the product. Admiting you work for the company that makes the product also puts you in a conflict of interest with regards to producing an article. As for comparing your software against a software with tens of millions of users around the world, from every walk of life that is the defacto standard of that kind of software worldwide is just... Canterbury Tail talk 16:56, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Error

Ben I made a revert on you the other day on the UDR page which was an error. I got my Derry's and Londonderry's mixed up. Sorry for any confusion. The Thunderer (talk) 18:30, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

That's fine, not a problem. Derry for City, Londonderry for county. Carry on the good work. Canterbury Tail talk 19:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

In relate to

Please state what you're message was in relation to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.45.222.60 (talk) 14:02, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Go to your room; you've been a very naughty boy.

You have to love an essay that manages to still ignore how an unblock request should go. --Blowdart | ^talk 20:47, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Gotta love it don't you. A couple of times is a mistake, continual pushing of your viewpoint despite being told that isn't the policy and consensus is disruptive editing. Also, I do have a suspicion (but no evidence) that that isn't a new user, however likely to be the same as that IP. Canterbury Tail talk 21:13, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Well I tried a bit more, but to no avail. I guess I'll return to breaking unit tests now. --Blowdart | ^talk 11:07, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

I've given up now, it's too big a brick wall to continue banging my head against *sigh* As an aside anonymous IPs are starting to change Londonderry Air to be a "national" rather than regional anthem. Any thoughts on that one? As it is I'm reverting it --Blowdart | ^talk 12:34, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

I considered reverting that one, but couldn't be bothered getting into that one as well. Oh and I've denied that guys unblock request based on his continued conversations with you. I was willing to unblock, but not now. Canterbury Tail talk 12:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Ah well I'll keep that one on my own radar now *grin* As for The Maiden City, I really tried I think, or rather I hope, but once the indication was there that he/she'd start reverted the Ireland links, well then I just gave up. No doubt we'll see another username appear at some point. Rather you than me with "admin superpowers" :) --Blowdart | ^talk 12:43, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, most people don't realise I'm an Admin. I don't go around advertising the fact. Canterbury Tail talk 14:30, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

user agrees to abide by Wikipedia rules, asking for unblock

See User talk:The Maiden City. Since you were the blocking admin, I thought I would seek your opinion. PLease respond ASAP. Thanks! --Jayron32.talk.contribs 19:01, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

217.45.222.60

This user is continuing to make naughty edits. Can you give him a ban?

Religious/WFAX

It may not be a "proper noun", but it is the station's format. For station's that play Adult Contemporary, we capitalize the format, because it is the format. Religious is a technical format title. If you have questions, please message me. - NeutralHomer • Talk • November 5, 2008 @ 01:29

Looking at the adult contemporary format stations it seems to be 50/50 as to whether it is capitalised or not, and the article you direct me to isn't capitalised. I also see no convention on the relevant wikiproject to say one way or the other. Even looking through a random category (Radio stations in Boston) it seems just random which is used, maybe slanting every so fractionally to lower case but not enough sample size to dictate one way or another for definite. Canterbury Tail talk 02:37, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Maybe I am in the minority of having it capitalized. I personally thought it was an MOS thing, but with what you said it isn't. No worries then :) Take Care...NeutralHomer • Talk • November 5, 2008 @ 02:48

Lulu (company)

Please do not remove valuable external links form the page. Thank you.--Kozuch (talk) 15:42, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Said link that you added was simply a review. This is not encyclopaedic in this context, Wikipedia does not exist to promote and judge companies. Canterbury Tail talk 16:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Still cant see the point. The article is full of self-references (which you judge ok probably), you are removing third party source...--Kozuch (talk) 16:49, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Thomas Kelso

Thanks for the clarification on Ireland. I see you seem to be interested in that region so can you point me to any interesting period information on the town mentioned in the references: Clonis Ireland?--Teda13 (talk) 21:00, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm afraid I know nothing about Clonis itself. Northern Ireland came around in the 20th century, but before that the entire island was just Ireland. I changed from North Ireland as it would imply to many people Northern Ireland, but north Ireland would also have been correct just to give a location but again could be confused by some. Canterbury Tail talk 23:42, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

User page of Matt Lewis

I think a more prominent official block notice and maybe a recognised resigned banner underneath it are in order for Matt's user page, as it currently looks like he has just voluntarily resigned and is still available for comment, at for example the arbitration request Everytype has just filed. MickMacNee (talk) 19:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

I've actually unblocked him so he can take place in discussions should he desire. Canterbury Tail talk 22:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

For Integrity and Reasonableness!

		The Manifest Integrity Barnstar
		Previously only awarded to Rockpocket - so you know what it's worth! Sarah777 (talk) 23:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Ottawa drama

Yep 10yr olds. Not that I'm eager for another Fed election; IMHO, Dion, Layton & Duceppe should take their coalition ideas to the people. They should let the Canadian public decide, between the Conservatives & the Liberal/NDP (back by the BQ) coalition. Also (IMHO) the Harper government got into trouble, not because of their economic policies, but because of the proposal to cut public funding to political parties. GoodDay (talk) 20:04, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Hey I can't vote anyway, so I have no say. Actually that proposal to cut funding to political parties I agree with. I was flabbergasted when I heard that such a thing existed in the first place. Public money going to fund political parties, that's just disgraceful and reprehensible! If a political party cannot fund itself then it doesn't have sufficient support. I couldn't believe that one. Is that unique to Canada? Canterbury Tail talk 20:50, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure public funds are a bad idea. Over here in the UK the Labour party were beholding to the unions who funded them through their members, and the conservatives get most of their money from millionaire businessmen who are obviously looking for favours in return. The Labour party over the last 10 years or so have been going down that route also. Titch Tucker (talk) 21:05, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Area of outstanding natural beauty

Can I ask why you've reverted all my corrections? Mooretwin (talk) 00:04, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Because Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty is a designation and is officially capitalised. Canterbury Tail talk 15:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

If you look at the primary source, you'll see that it's not. Mooretwin (talk) 16:17, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Not according to the National Association of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty. [1] Canterbury Tail talk 16:20, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

I can't see anywhere on that site where they claim the primary source uses capitals. Mooretwin (talk) 16:24, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Really, I can't see anywhere that doesn't use them. Canterbury Tail talk 16:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

So you haven't looked at the primary source, then? Mooretwin (talk) 16:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

I've looked at the areas of common and actual usage necessary to determine capitalisation and usage by Wikipedia guidelines yes. Is there a point you're trying to make here, or some evidence outside of all this you are wanting considered? Canterbury Tail talk 16:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

So you don't consider the primary source under which the areas are governed as being actual usage or relevant to the use of capitals? Mooretwin (talk) 16:55, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm still waiting to see this primary source. If you have evidence to show, produce it on the talk pages. Going by the usages in the article, and the references in the article, capitalised is the form, and also the common usage under our common usage rules. Canterbury Tail talk 17:50, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

The primary source is linked in the discussion of the RM. Mooretwin (talk) 20:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

hello

I want you to put a fada on Eoghain Quigg's name on his article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevy07 (talk • contribs) 01:46, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, but there is no source to say he uses a fada in his name. Canterbury Tail talk 02:48, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Link Changes

Please do not indiscriminately revert link changes as you did in James Bond. It was not my intention to change English spellings away from British to American but I am changing links related to Java by hand and have noticed lots of other spelling errors in articles and thus just quickly fixed a few things my spelling checker picks out. I am sorry if it "corrupted" the English spellings of this article. I serious thought about reverting your revert again as the revert-count-in-a-day-rule is against you (you started the reversions). Instead, I just put the J2ME->Java ME link changes back in by hand again (minus any other changes). 96.225.224.216 (talk) 03:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

G8

Just wondered if the edit summary which reversed your most recent edit needs further explanation? Maybe not, but I did wonder? --Tenmei (talk) 05:05, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

I am confused, they are two separate entities and the G7 and G8 should not be confused as the same thing. Canterbury Tail talk 14:39, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

A useful word here is "conflate" or "conflation". While it is patently obvious that the G7 and the G6 were explicitly distinguishable in 1976, and the G8 and the G7 were readily differentiated in 1998 ... something has happened in the intervening years. Without being too specific about how and when the commonly-understood usage became accepted; the fact-of-the-matter is that the most recent summit of G8 leaders which was held in Hokkaido, Japan is conventionally identified as the "34th G8 summit." Furthermore, plans for an upcoming "35th G8 summit" in Italy and for a "36th G8 summit" in Canada are reported in the international press and elsewhere. These ordinal numbers implicate a process of counting backwards through the years and it also requires conflating the G6 and the G7 and the G8 .... -- see, e.g., List of summits, 1-25; G7/8 summits.

Does this help clarify? --Tenmei (talk) 20:57, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Ah fair enough then. Thanks for clarifying. Canterbury Tail talk 23:09, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Eoghan Quigg

Why will you not let the guy be Irish? That's what he claims to be - he's always said on the TV he wanted to win X factor for his country, Ireland. He also never said once that he was from Country Londonderry, but always Country Derry.

I'm not really that bothered, but Eoghan is very clear on the matter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.195.4 (talk) 14:55, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Has he ever stated that he holds full Irish citizenship? No if not then he is a British citizen like everyone born in Northern Ireland. However Northern Irish is much more neutral than us deciding he is either Irish or British. As for County Derry, there is no such county. There is the county called County Londonderry, that some call County Derry, but no official county called County Derry. Canterbury Tail talk 17:42, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

I think the same point that you apply to County Derry could also be applied to Northern Irish as there is no such nationality. 91.125.195.4 (talk) 23:13, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

There is no legal Northern Irish nationality, but it's not being used to denote a nationality, only that he's from Northern Ireland. Unless he comes out and tells his actual legal nationality, it's best to be neutral in regards to Northern Ireland. Northern Irish doesn't denote a legal nationality, but does denote where he's from much like Londoner, Liverpudlian, Dubliner, Scottish, Welsh, English etc. Canterbury Tail talk 23:17, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

OK would you agree with this change

from "Eoghan Quigg (born 12 July, 1992[1]) is an Northern Irish singer who finished 3rd in the fifth series of the British music talent contest The X Factor (UK) in 2008."

to Eoghan Quigg (born 12 July, 1992[1]) is singer from Northern Ireland who finished 3rd in the fifth series of the British music talent contest The X Factor (UK) in 2008.

91.125.195.4 (talk) 14:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

I've certainly got no problems with that. I'd map X Factor (UK) to read just The X Factor. Canterbury Tail talk 14:55, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Dear god, he's Irish for goodness sake! You really are ridiculous.--Theosony (talk) 13:13, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Excuse me? Do you have a copy of his passport and evidence that he has in fact taken up Irish nationality? If not then he's actually most likely British by birth by virtual of being born in the United Kingdom. However until someone has firm evidence one way or another, being born in Northern Ireland is good enough and means as a neutral encyclopaedia, Wikipedia isn't labelling him. Canterbury Tail talk 13:17, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

I've proven it through looking for sources. Even though you don't believe something, look for sources on the contrary anyway - it's called being an editor. You are simply being provocative.--Theosony (talk) 01:42, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

There are references yes, but not a single provided source has proven that he has Irish citizenship, and no British citizenship. Please read WP:Citing sources and Wikipedia:Verifiability. Also you have been warned before, do not make personal attacks on other users and make statements like "you are simply being provocative." Canterbury Tail talk 02:39, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

RE:VintageKits

Thanks for the heads up.--Tznkai (talk) 03:13, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Bach redirects

Hello Ben, I recently created a redirect for BWV 47 (a page I'm about to create in the course of the project "application of a uniform Bach template to cantatas"). Similarly I've gone through numerous other pages updating links or creating redirections (there is a template that relies on these redirections). I know you're a "recent changes patroller" - but could you wait a couple of hours in the case of those redirections - just enough time for me to put them up.

Thanks! Campelli (talk) 16:18, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

That's fine. I deleted the one, thinking at the time it was actually a vandalism redirect. Then checked your edit history and realised what was going on. I really should have recreated it, but didn't get the chance and got distracted. Sorry. Canterbury Tail talk 16:26, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Requesting 5 articles which were deleted

Hello ben, as you know, you are listed as an administrator who can provide deleted articles to a user.

I am requesting 5 articles, listed here with the admins closing reason [never mind about Rollac]:

• Newton Howard Delete all except Center for Advanced Defense Studies, for which there seems to be no consensus.. Lankiveil (speak to me) 08:54, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
• Rollac delete as hoax, block creator as hoaxer. DS (talk) 15:54, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
• The Illegal Waste delete Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 12:09, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
• SCORES Broadcast delete J.delanoygabsadds 04:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
• FilePile.com delete J.delanoygabsadds 04:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
• Nonpseudoscience delete J.delanoygabsadds 04:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

From: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 November 15

If I could please also get the creator's name and date it was created?

You can add all 5 pages to a userspace, lets say User:Inclusionist/Newton Howard.

I really appreciate it. You are probably wondering why I ask. Well, I have spent my weekend on a graph found here: User:Inclusionist/AfD on average day. I am interested in what type of user gets their page deleted, etc....November 15 is just a day pulled out of a hat by another user today.

Thank you fellow inclusionist (your template). Do you know any admins that don't have the inclusionist template who are also inclusionists? travb (talk) 04:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Ben, thank you for the prompt response. In answer to your questions:

I wasn't sure from your other requests, but do you want copies of the pages added to your user space? Yes

If so which version, the one immediately before deletion? Yes

Re:

• Newtown Howard - User:Cads.media
• The Illegal Waste - User:Waxaposse
• SCORES Broadcast - User:Limp73
• FilePile.com - User:Tranquileye
• Nonpseudoscience - User:0XQ

I am interested in what date the page was created, the reason is because at User talk:Inclusionist/AfD on average day, I calculate how many edits the editor had, before he created the article. I found when I was alerting editors of AfDs that the vast majority 80%, were new users.

thanks again. travb (talk) 17:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

PortaWalk, Inc.

I've listed PortaWalk, Inc. for deletion. AnyPerson (talk) 00:49, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, I just hadn't gotten around to it. Canterbury Tail talk 02:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Slapsnot Usertalk

Hello, Canterbury Tail. You have new messages at Slapsnot's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sikh and ye shall find

Hi Ben; you might also want to check this user's edit history [2]. Appears very similar to the user you blocked [3]. Cheers, JNW (talk) 02:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Hello Mr. Bell, thank you for helping out my massive blunder. I was horrified by it. I will re-read help files and try make sure i don't do that again. Again, thanks and my apology. --Colt9033 (talk) 13:45, 23 January 2009 (UTC)