User talk:Coasterlover1994/Archive 2
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
For the most recent topics, please see here.
Hi. Was this a mistake? The article clearly doesn't qualify for A1. Maybe you meant A7? I don't really care either way but I wanted to make sure the article gets the attention it needs. OlYeller21Talktome 22:31, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, I meant A7. I apologize. Further description is below. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 22:02, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
I added the comment on the BBS Kraftfahrzeugtechnik page to let people know that the link was broken because some idiot removed a few people's hard work making the wheel library, but left the link to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.229.237.168 (talk) 02:33, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:18, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:16, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:44, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Your CSD nomination from December
Hello Coasterlover1994. I noticed you were applying for AWB. Are you willing to comment on this CSD nomination you made in December 2012, which causes me some concern. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 19:08, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- I remember that edit. I meant to throw it on Afd for lack of notability and the unreferenced BLP (only source was Twitter). The lack of sources probably drove the A1 request. In retrospect, a very stupid decision on my part. I usually use Afd for anything other than a nonsense. I apologize for that uncharacteristic mistake on my part Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 19:23, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. I've added you to the list for AWB so you should be able to run it now. EdJohnston (talk) 22:38, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
NY junction lists
Hello, Coasterlover1994. I noticed you've been color-coating junction lists in New York State Route articles. Please note that while WP:USRD does this, WP:NYSR is a completely different project with different standards. They do not color-coat their junction lists. Thanks. –TCN7JM 21:52, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- I apologize. I can't keep the various standards straight. Will revert my edits. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 21:54, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- It isn't your fault. Lots of us at USRD don't get it either. –TCN7JM 21:55, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- There are a lot of things about this state I don't get. That is only one of them Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 21:57, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- It isn't your fault. Lots of us at USRD don't get it either. –TCN7JM 21:55, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:31, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Help test new SuggestBot design
We have developed an exciting new version of SuggestBot’s interface with some cool features! Volunteer to be one of the first users to try it and help us make it better by answering a short survey! If you’re interested in participating, leave us a message on SuggestBot’s user talk page. Regards from Nettrom, SuggestBot’s caretaker. 18:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:40, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Feel free...
...to stalk me back;) — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 03:15, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:29, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Editor's Barnstar |
| swag Liberty2044 (talk) 00:35, 28 June 2013 (UTC) |
Fractal Audio Axe-Fx
I do not think the mark for deletion is irrelevant. The page is precise about telling people what is the Axe Fx, an guitar processor, and shows precisely all aspects of how it works. A quick search on google shows this. What i found really bad is marking something for deletion because the person doesnt understand what it is. 177.81.121.212 (talk) 16:08, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
American Idol
Hi, thank you for your response and time. According to many reports about American Idol, judges Randy Jackson, Nicki Manij, and Mariah Carey are all leaving as the Wikipedia article correctly states. However, it leads the viewer to the wrong conclusion. They are not leaving because that was their initial decision, they are leaving because he producers made it clear that they would not be asked back. This in essence is a firing. Sometime we like to protect stars and, especially if we like them, we do not want to see negative publicity about them. But the fact of the matter is they were fired, and as such, their PR people have put a spin on it. When I changed the article and added the fact that they were not asked back, I was going for a NPOV.. the honesty and straight-forwardness of this makes the article much better. Anyone watching Jackson's reaction could also tell he was not really ready to go. But that has nothing to do with it. These three judges were not asked back, and the verdict is still up in the air on Keith Urban's status as of this writing. Both sides need to be written on; the fact that American Idol was not asking them back, and that they "supposedly" wanted to leave. But to write on one viewpoint -the judges- and leave off the other viewpoint -American Idol- were there are countless articles stating that they were no plans to ask them back after this season is not NPOV. In fact, they even considered bringing Jennifer Lopez back as a juge in place of Mariah Carey. But Carey knew what an embarrassment that would be, so she threaten the show with a lawsuit if they replaced her midway through the season with Lopez. The producers decided to let the show continue as it was, perhaps not to make more waves and controversy which would take the focus away from the contestants, and left all judges in place. But many reports made it clear that producers would not be asking them back. Several weeks after that, the judges are "leaving" as their PR people put it. Some people may be big Mariah Carey or Nicki Manij fans but for an encyclopedia, the thruth should prevail. It's the standard Wikipedia should be going for.. not to protect artists because someone is a fan. Thanks very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.251.112.134 (talk) 01:19, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
- I understand what your intent is and I know that it was a good faith edit (WP:GF). Yet, WP:V states that each addition must have a verifiable source, especially when a famous person is involved. If you can link a source to it (there should be many), it will be allowed. Thank you for your interest in keeping Wikipedia up to date. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 01:24, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I should have linked a verifiable source with the update. Thanks, I do appreciate your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.251.112.134 (talk) 01:29, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Al Campanis
I'm not clear why my edit was reverted on the Al Campanis article. The citation was in reference to the statement that Lasorda and others had spoken out for Campanis, and the Larry Elder article/op-ed I cite provides direct quotes of such. Please elaborate. Thanks. Tagryn (talk) 01:35, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
- I apologize, this was a mistake on my part. Many racist edits were made around the same time and I was attempting to perform damage control. Your edit has been restored. Again, I apologize, and this will never happen again. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 19:28, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Your reversion to my contributions on BSA Spitfire page
Gooday - I noticed that my considerable contributions which I have carefully researched, entered and sourced have been immediately and entirely reverted by I assume an automated sequence and that you have not actually read the sections and that you have no specific knowledge of the subject?
I have been here for around six months and I have expanded many poor and stub articles. This is the first time I have been dealt with peremptorily as a Vandal! This also suggests a lack of AGF on your part?
I am an Englishman, writing in English, often but not exclusively about English motorcycles. I guess you probably are too young to have any knowledge of 1960s English motorcycles, but the article as it stood previously was badly-written with poor content obtained from a dotcom site with bad and confusing chronology and content which was not relevant with whole sections missing. (This - sadly - is not uncommon).
I have the source material in my possession and if you peruse my past contributions I hope you will be able to deduce that I am not a vandal. There was a little outstanding info to be added to BSA Spitfire when I had located the source material in my collection.
I am presently researching some 20 other works in various states of progress, and it would be to the detriment of Wikipedia if I am to be discouraged from contributing in this way in case the same thing happens again. I need to know from you that I am not wasting my time.
I look forward to your comments on your actions and to seeing the edits I have made re-instated
ThanQ Rocknrollmancer (talk) 01:59, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
- I apologize. This was a mistake on my end. Upon further research, your contributions have been constructive in the past. The revert was intended for another user on another page, but server lag caused it to be applied to your page. Your edits have been restored, with a couple minor changes made to conform to policy. Again, I apologize. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 19:41, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
- Many thanks Rocknrollmancer (talk) 20:42, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
79.something
Hello Sir, I don't know how this works but I intended to correct some obviously wrong information in here. It's such a pitty Wikipedia doesn't hold for higher standards because it is patently obvious that this information is not only deprived of convincing scientific and academic data as it contradicts most other Wikipedia articles somewhat related to these issues. A shame... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.169.179.81 (talk) 23:26, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
- Wikipedia does hold high standards for every article on the site. The first two edits you made were an unexplained removal of content, while the third was a blatant violation of WP:NPOV. If you intend to remove a large amount of content, please provide a detailed explanation in the edit summary as to why and/or start a discussion on the talk page to fix it. Editors are always willing to make changes if an explanation is provided. Without an explanation, removal of content is characterized as vandalism. Enjoy Wikipedia, Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 23:34, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
- Ok smarthead,
- I have a life. I have more to do than masturbate in front of the computer.
- However, I will try to find time to get you out of here.
The article you posted is nonesense, I was doing some research on how the Arab ethnic group formed in the Fertile Crescent for my Doctoral thesis. I found this and tried to move it out. If you are serious about your participation in Wikipedia, please, help me out and tell me how I can report you to someone who knows at least half as much about History as I do, I don't know... someone that reviews the articles at wikipedia?
- I reiterate: Nothing that you uploaded in those articles I tried to change makes any sense whatsoever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.169.179.81 (talk) 23:42, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
- Two other members of the community agree with me and reverted you edits. They are a violation of policy. If there is an issue, mention it on the article's talk page or the project discussion page. Inline comments are not allowed. And coming a fellow student, Wikipedia proper should NOT be an academic source. I'd look at the cited sources. Wikipedia is a great starting point, but the info here is subject to vandalism and biased material (such as that which you inserted). I'm a reviewer for articles related to history and engineering. Please, use the talk page. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 23:50, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Oh please, I don't remember this very well but... please... tell me who are the two intelectual heavy weights who agree with you... I could bring a whole department on Oriental Studies of two or three prestigeous Universities to my side... Anyway, I have more things to do but I am here to help you CORRECT the wrong in that article, if you want Wikipedia to be corrected, of course. If so, tell me what I *should* do. If you just want to show the world your pitty version of facts so that the few ignorant children who will read this get too impressed and consider your pseudo-History as fact... then tell me nonetheless and I'll leave you alone with your wikipage. Have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.169.179.81 (talk) 11:26, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
No
I deleted your deletion template. --Monorail du Plessis (talk) 20:58, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
You recently removed an edit on J. Dash's page because it wasn't "constructive" to you. However, Miley Cyrus' dance video boosted his popularity — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gracekc96 (talk • contribs) 00:35, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
- The edit was removed for multiple reasons. Notably, it was not phrased in a manner acceptable for an encyclopedia and it was unsourced. Sources are required on Wikipedia. The claim made can be considered biased if there is not a reputable source backing it up. What is the measure of popularity? How did the popularity increase? What is "twerking"? If you can source it, feel free to add it back in, but without a source, it is a violation of WP:NPOV. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 00:44, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
El Paso Times
I am an editor for the El Paso Times and the wikipedia page for the newspaper reflects an outdated staff list. The changes I made were correct. Please change them back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.114.247.34 (talk) 00:52, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
- I apologize. The names were similar to prank names recently inserted on other pages and I thought that it was a continuation of that vandalism spree. The page has been fixed.
- Sincerely, Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 00:57, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
BBS Kraftfahrzeugtechnik
I added the comment on the BBS Kraftfahrzeugtechnik page to let people know that the link was broken because some idiot removed a few people's hard work making the wheel library, but left the link to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.229.237.168 (talk) 02:33, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- It is a violation of policy to call out a user in the main (article) namespace. Actually, the article namespace cannot contain any links into any other namespace (including the "user" space). If you want to question an action, post a message on their talk page or on the article's talk page. Any edits calling out an editor in an article will be removed immediately. Sincerely, Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 02:42, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Please note that your revert on this page actually ended up adding copyrighted material to the article. Please be careful of reverts you make, especially when no apparent reason for it is given. Edit Summaries are a good habit, but not everyone follows them. Please be careful about it the next time, because you are responsible for your own edits.
Cheers,
TheOriginalSoni (talk) 01:33, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- I apologize. I was struck by the unexplained section blanking performed by a single IP and reverted the edit based on that alone, unaware of any copyright violations contained within.
- Sincerely,
- Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 01:39, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- Dont worry Coasterlover1994, I made the same silly mistake, so did three other vandal fighters. :P Prabash.Akmeemana 01:45, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- While I agree that most section blankings turn out to be malicious, its always better to AGF and consider whether the edits are actually bettering the article or not, especially because some GF newer editors might just forget/not know to add the ES.
- I hope you'll be careful about further reverts :)
- Cheers,
- TheOriginalSoni (talk) 01:53, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Tontogany Ohio and Cry Baby Lane
Hello Sir/Mam. I would like to inform you that the edits you made to my page are incorrect. If you believe the comments about the mayor are false, please check Time's database of the Sexiest Man Alive Awards. If you still disagree please message me. If not, please restore the edits. Thank you!
Happy Editing ipodtouchboy18
- A claim of that sort must be cited or it will be removed as vandalism. Such claims convey much bias if a reputable source is not supplied. Add a reputable source that is not in violation of copyright and it'll be good to go.
- Sincerely,
- Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 19:19, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Talkback July 2013
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--Gay airline editor (talk) 02:31, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- I am unsure what this means and how it relates to my username? --Gay airline editor (talk) 02:31, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
No
I deleted your deletion template due to mistakes by you . --Monorail du Plessis (talk) 20:59, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Great job! I see you're on top of reversions. JustBerry (talk) 21:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC) |
Response
How was my edit of Stanford nonconstructive? I thought it provided valid, interesting information. I wasn't trying to be malicious. 67.165.211.27 (talk) 02:01, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- It was an unnecessary and unencyclopedic, violating WP:TONE. I share the same opinion and believe that you were working under WP:AGF, but it is just an opinion and a violation of WP:NPOV to suggest said opinion within an article without a reputable source.
- Sincerely,
- Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 02:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
You did not withdraw my complaint regarding my username. Please withdraw and I will do the same: WP:ANI User:Coasterlover1994 undermined my gayness. Thank you. --Gay airline editor (talk) 04:56, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- I do not see how the username in question or the user's edit history links stupidity with homosexuality. Please see the user page. As an experienced editor, I state on my user page that I am a male married to a female, with two children. And I display a userbox supporting same sex marriage. Perhaps you might want to reconsider your concern about the name. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:05, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- I fully support same sex marriage and I was cheering when the Defense of Marriage Act was partially overturned, but I know how the word "gay" can be used as a negative modifier, especially with the recent events in my home country and the associated anti-gay sentiment. In my area especially, the word is nearly always used in a negative manner. Additionally, it is rare to see the oword in the usernames of constructive editors due to the anti-gay sentiment in the United States. Upon seeing the user page, I realized that the user is using the modifier in a positive manner. I was not trying to create an incident and I realize that I should have contacted User:Gay airline editor directly before filing a report at WP:UAA. I did not see the user page until shortly before this message was written and would have formally apologized beforehand if I had. I was not in any way trying to undermine his sexuality. I apologize for any trouble I may have caused and, if it were still visible at WP:UAA, would have withdrawn my request immediately. Keep on editing and again, I apologize.
- Sincerely,
- Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 16:47, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- I appreciate your response and hope this ends the matter. Thank you. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 17:24, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, very courteous. 66.191.153.36 (talk) 01:27, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
- I am back from a wikibreak. Thanks for your response and explanation. Cheers, friend! --Gay airline editor (talk) 19:55, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Left me message
Dilbert website recently changed and removed/castrated their RSS feed. Nobody seems to have updated the page, so I did it. So stuff your sanctimonious message please — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.126.67.110 (talk) 02:21, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- It should have been contained within the reference at all. In-line comments of that nature are not permitted within the article namespace. I moved it into the reference, but it may be removed by a future editor. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 02:27, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
American Begonia Society
The information was taken directly from the society's own website (which is linked within the article), as indicated in both the edit summary and the text itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.111.254.17 (talk) 16:59, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- Your edit was reverted because it was not cited. All information on the site must be cited unless it is common knowledge. If your additions are cited, they will be allowed, providing they are not disruptive. The message I posted on your talk page should have links to help you cite other webpages.
- Sincerely,
- Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 17:08, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Byrom
If my edit didn't seem constructive, perhaps you should read it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.92.128.150 (talk) 10:16, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:27, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks!
I appreciate your help with Brenda Venus. I read a LOT of bios of Hollywood-oriented writers, actors and directors (particularly those born between 1900-1960) and they are frequently poorly sourced with many superlatives ("the most glamorous woman", "one of the most influential directors", "with a fashion style admired by many", "thought to be the most beautiful", etc.)...the worst of them read like fan websites. It's a lot for one individual to address when it's the predominant style of writing for an entire category of people.
Despite that, I had never proposed an article deletion before but this page just has so many unverified claims and old {citation needed} tags. And then, I, perhaps foolishly, wrote to the subject of the article and alerted her of the state of the proposed deletion, suggesting that she, or someone else, provide some reliable sources to prevent its deletion. That kind of backfired on me. :-( 69.125.134.86 (talk) 17:05, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:31, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:31, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:32, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, pleaseconsult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:42, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:44, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:59, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:39, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:00, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Asmallworld Edits
I am sorry you didn't feel my edits were neutral on the asmallworld page. I believe they are, I cited all of my sources and wikipedia currently believes that the cite is not neutral because it is too much of an advertisement. The page currently highlights only the 'good parts' of asmallworld, was written by their employees, and fails to mention the facts which I included and cited in my edits.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:21, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:56, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
About Juan José Videgain
This Writer page has been deleted in the encyclopedia in Castilian for not finding such data, that is an old video interview that incorporates a national television TVE in Spain country that makes clear its importance in his office, but it seems important to tell me what he considers important, please check well before handling the material. Thank you. --87.219.38.209 (talk) 17:41, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Chris McMillian
Hi Coasterlover1994,
I noticed you tagged the Chris McMillian wikipedia page, stating that it may not pass the notability requirements. I'm wondering what further proof would be necessary? 1) He's listed in a magazine as one of the top 25 cocktail personalities of the last century. 2) He's co-founder of a registered museum. 3) He's been invited to speak at the Smithsonian on the subject of cocktails. 4) Other "famous" bartenders have wikipedia pages with far less accolades. 5) 3rd-string offensive guards for football teams, that never play a game, have wikipedia pages. What makes them more notable than him?
Anyway, I'm just confused. I think there is definitely enough on there for his page to be established. If you can tell me what further proof of notability that I should give, I'll find it. Otherwise, I request the tag to be removed, or the page to be reviewed by another expert. Thanks. Vcczar (talk) 16:40, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:38, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:08, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:55, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
John B. Chittick
I wanted to know why exactly you know prevented my edits from happening?? §Jazz14 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazz14 (talk • contribs) 23:02, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:11, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!!!
.JPG)
E-e-bayer_lover (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
And remember to keep the CHRIST in CHRISTmas! E-e-bayer_lover (talk) 22:54, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Quixotic plea
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 04:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Wiknik Buffalo
Wiknik Buffalo is being planned for July 26, 2015. You can find more information here: Wikipedia:Meetup/Buffalo.BuffaloBob (talk) 02:49, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
new pages for new face of year, debut at fillmfare
thats why corrections been made. thanksWikiBriefed (talk) 00:25, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi
Hope I am doing this right since I have never replied on a users talk page so if I am doing something wrong please forgive me.
In regards to Anna Gilligan (now at times Anna Levy). She was in a significant relationship with Steve Guttenberg. That is part of both their lives. 1 user seems to have a bug about that relationship. First he wanted it sourced. I provided a source & he whined. I added a second source & now he is dismissing it a trivial gossip & he doesnt approved of the sources. Well Youtube & Contact Music seem to be legit sites as viewed by the internet.
This seems to be someone who doesnt want that fact on that page. Reminds me of a certain celeb that kept reediting their own page to hide the fact 1 of her kids was from a relationship with her makeup man rather than with her husband as she was claiming. She finally was shut down when I linked to the original people article with those facts in black & white.
Thanks
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:21, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:20, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Hey! I wanted to let you know about an upcoming Art+Feminism event, at Bennington College on March 5: from 2-6 in the afternoon. It would be great to see some more Wikipedia editors at the event! Sign up here to let us know you will be attending! Sadads (talk) 02:58, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:17, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 07:13, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:01, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Coasterlover1994. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
The Center Line: Spring 2017
Volume 9, Issue 1 • Spring 2017 • About the Newsletter
|
|
- —delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 on 01:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Yusuf al-Qaradawi
Hey! Revert back to my edits. I'm adding more citation soon! Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.156.181.76 (talk) 19:36, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi
Was there a reason you sought to reinsert an incorrect link or unsourced false text? Of 19 (talk) 19:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
- Yes. Unjustified removal of a large block of content. Coasterlover1994 19:52, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
- You need to be given a medal! You take the time out of your valuable day to delete a user's first edit which deletes unsourced tripe and fixes the link to the other source used. With guys like you around I'm surprised anyone ever continues to edit. I hope you quit so that others way join and stay. Of 19 (talk) 20:00, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
If any more edits to this page show up in Huggle, you might as well leave them alone as the page obviously was created as vandalism or a joke. Should be gone shortly. Home Lander (talk) 19:47, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Artfollower adding relevant info
Apologies I'm not too familiar with wikipedia edits (I'm new) but could you explain why my addition of galleries that represent artists count as vandalism, so I can do it right next time. Most major artists have their representing galleries listed on their wikipedia page, so I was having fun helping add a few, but not sure why it is incorrect or wrong to do so. I find it interesting to know where to find their exhibitions and latest works. Thank you!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Coasterlover1994. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
I did nothing wrong.
The official name of Vietnam is the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. You know nothing about the vietnamese history. Why is that vandalism. And why are you lying. Can you please explain to me. Kayelobes (talk) 19:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
You are encouraged to change
[[User:Coasterlover1994|<font color="red"><b>Coasterlover</b></font>]][[User talk:Coasterlover1994|<font color="black"><b>1994</b></font>]]: Coasterlover1994
to
[[User:Coasterlover1994|<b style="color: red">Coasterlover</b>]][[User talk:Coasterlover1994|<b style="color: black">1994</b>]]: Coasterlover1994
—Anomalocaris (talk) 20:08, 28 January 2018 (UTC)