User talk:E Bilko

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, E Bilko, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 14:29, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, E Bilko. You have new messages at Fry1989's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

E Bilko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm accused of being Yattum, I have read through the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yattum, and don't see any connection. None of our articles are even close in any kind of similarity. I have referred to images of a blocked user vega61 for the sole purpose of updating Military aircraft insignia . I thought images uploaded by users who were blocked or not, still belong to the community of WP and if that's a crime, than I'm sorry. However I have NOT employed any destructive edits. Although I have been blatantly accused by Fry1989 for being a sock puppet, and he has been on a vindictive campaign to get me blocked, for reverting some of his edits which had no references or valid sources. The accusation made by Fry1989 are 100% false and unfounded. At no time did I engage in any malicious attacks on Fry1989 and all of my edits and image uploads have been back up with proper reference and sources. And where they may have been, any major issues, I have taken them to discussion for a consensus with other editors. I don't know how these investigation work but, I hope someone really looks into this. Thank you E Bilko (talk) 18:18, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I don't know about Yattum, but there are just too many connections between your editing and Vega61's. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:27, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

E Bilko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To many connections between my editing and Vega61? I used his format for uploading images. My IP address has no connection to Vega61. No techincal proof other than, similar edits is no bases for blocking me. I have NOT employed any destructive edits. Maybe there's an Adminstrator, who can show me some hard evidence. If nothing eles someone please look into Fry1989 ThanxE Bilko (talk) 01:56, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Umm, how are you so absolutely sure that there is no connection between your IP address and Vega61's? I'm constrained to decline your request. Wifione _.......^{Leave a message} 08:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File:SAAF low Viz insig 325.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SAAF low Viz insig 325.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:14, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Singapor Low Viz Ins222.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Singapor Low Viz Ins222.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:34, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Singapor Low Viz Ins222.svg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Singapor Low Viz Ins222.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:34, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:RAAF-Lowvis-Insig888.svg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RAAF-Lowvis-Insig888.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 18:00, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]