User talk:FateHags99

Zonhoven[edit]

Ik spreek je even in het Nederlands aan. Jawel, ik ken Zonhoven, ik woon er, ik heb de volledige Nederlandstalige Wikipediapagina geschreven. Ik ken de persoon naar waar je refereert zelfs persoonlijk. Stop met het toevoegen van zijn naam onder 'bekende inwoners' op alle Wikipedia's. Ik weet niet eens of hijzelf hiervan op de hoogte is. Ø11 (talk) 19:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bedankt voor uw bericht. Het is interessant om te horen dat je zo bekend bent met Zonhoven en zelfs de Nederlandstalige Wikipediapagina hebt geschreven.

Ik ben benieuwd naar uw persoonlijke kennis van de betreffende persoon. Mocht u bereid zijn om uw identiteit te delen. Ik begrijp niet waarom u hem verwijderd onder ‘bekende inwoners. Gezien zijn bekendheid binnen Zonhoven, is het een waardevolle toevoeging aan de Wikipedia’s. FateHags99 (talk) 06:56, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Er zijn heel wat mensen kandidaat bij de komende verkiezingen, maar geen enkel van hen wordt vermeld onder 'bekende Zonhovenaren'. Ik begrijp niet waarom deze persoon specifiek wel vermeld zou moeten worden of wat hem bekend maakt. Ø11 (talk) 08:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hoe kent u Cristiano Cuppens? En waarom denkt u dat hij geen meerwaarde is voor de wikipedia van Zonhoven? FateHags99 (talk) 10:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Er is geen meerwaarde voor zijn vermelding onder de lijst "bekende Zonhovenaren". Ik zie niet in waarom hij vermeld zou moeten worden. Er wordt immers geen enkele andere voormalige, huidige of opkomende politicus vermeld. Een lokale politicus die gemeenteraadslid of schepen is wordt nooit vermeld, laat staan iemand die kandidaat is bij de komende gemeenteraadsverkiezingen. Neen, hij behoort niet tot de categorie "bekende Zonhovenaren". Ø11 (talk) 20:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kunt u zeggen wie u feitelijk bent, ik begrijp niet waarom u hem er niet wilt laten opstaan. Als u hem dan toch persoonlijk kent, zou u hem hiermee een groot plezier mee doen. Mensen die goede intenties hebben en Zonhoven hiermee op de kaart zetten horen nu eenmaal op Wikipedia. FateHags99 (talk) 12:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Omdat dit de Engelstalige Wikipedia is, zal ik in het Engels reageren, zodat anderen het kunnen begrijpen.

In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. In the case of a politician, there are more refined guidelines for politicians. Unelected candidates for political office are not notable unless they are notable for other things outside of politics.

Also, describing this individual as an "upcoming" politician emphasizes that they are not notable for inclusion... Wikipedia does not included up-and-coming people or things. Possible future fame has no effect on present notability. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Your recent editing history at Zonhoven shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -Fastily 20:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zonhoven[edit]

Dear FateHags99, I can't express how grateful I am for your thoughtful gesture of adding me to our local town of Zonhoven. Being a part of Zonhoven brings me immense joy, and knowing that you took the time to include me in this way fills me with gratitude. I look forward to contributing to our town in any way I can and being a positive presence in our community. CristianoCuppens (talk) 12:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CristianoCuppens: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of topics that are deemed to be notable. You do not appear to meet these criteria. If and when you receive sufficient coverage from reliable and independent sources to pass Wikipedia's notability criteria for people, then you would be considered worthy of inclusion. But not before. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because your username is a clear violation of Wikipedia's username policy – it is obviously offensive, profane, violent, threatening, sexually explicit, disruptive, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to Wikipedia. Please see our blocking and username policies for more information.

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but users are not allowed to edit with accounts that have inappropriate usernames, and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, or would otherwise like to explain why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the following text to the bottom of your user talk page: {{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}} ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FateHags99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I made this account a few months ago and picked my name based of a friend’s suggestion. I didn’t realize that my username contained hateful speech against gay people. Until I realized this a few weeks ago, I tried to change my username but, I forgot my password and didn’t give a email when making this account. Furthermore, the device my account is on crashed every few minutes. I’m very sorry that I did not realize it earlier and I hope you understand. FateHags99 (talk) 10:20, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Didn't realize"? I dont' think that's the case, given that you also created User:FateHags96 and User:FateHags97. Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 13:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So I am wondering, did your friend trick you by proposing this username, or is this a language barrier issue?(or both/neither) 331dot (talk) 11:57, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To 331dot and --jpgordon Hello, my friend that proposed this username did trick me into this, before I realized what my username could mean I made a couple of other accounts under the same name with another number. There’s also a language barrier issue at play here, my native language is not English and I was not familiar with the meaning of “Fags” in the US. If I’d known this earlier I wouldn’t have taken this username. I am not homophobic, homophobia is a trick by the ruling bourgeoisie class to divide us. FateHags99 (talk) 10:20, 4 May 2024 (UTC)}}[reply]