User talk:Fluck

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Confused[edit]

Erm,what are you talking about, Fluck? I didn't make any alterations/additions to the Global Warming entry. Possibly some confusion?

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.25.8.136 (talk) 17:25, 6 May 2007 (UTC). Haha okay, Richard Blackwood... The link was wrong, but the sentiment still applies :p[reply]


Didn't delete any links[edit]

What you taking about? I did renamed one link and moved their position other than that all links are there. Could you name what link are you refering too? Bravehartbear 08:10, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They are there under the critical link

Free Zone links

  • International Freezone Association
  • Information on Changes within the Church

Afther those are the Other links section. Just keep scrolling down. Bravehartbear 08:41, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just grouped them under their own section. I just put all free zone together because they are related. Bravehartbear 08:47, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well. I'm not the first person to get screwed over by not reading to the bottom. - Fluck 09:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an awesome bot![edit]

I love you cmdrobot. Let's elope to the hills and have perfectly spelled children. No, but seriously, great job :D Keep upholding the iron fist of English! - Fluck 15:02, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. Thank you! Having just read your user page, I'm glad I'm on your good side; it sounds like your enemies have a difficult time of it. I'm happy to hear you believe in the iron fist of prescriptivism too. None of this namby pamby descriptive linguistics for us! CmdrObot 00:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Self RFCN for your Signature[edit]

Fluck, we've been discussing your proposed signature, and it's gotten mixed reviews. On one hand, it's quite funny (that or OH!Fluck... brilliant in comedy), but on the other, some people might find offense to it. There have been several suggestions, including my own, that you may want to consider choosing a different signature. Feel free to add your input at any time. Thanks! CASCADIAHowl/Trail 00:29, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add to that, I have closed the discussion, your signature is fine, it's not a direct reference to anything offensive - it's simply an extension of your username. Many thanks for submitting it for review, it was very impressive for you to do that. If ever you need any help or adive, please feel free to contact me. Ryan Postlethwaite 01:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fluck. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Mudbox32 sandbox model.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Fluck. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 23:52, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Take that, me. - Fluck 05:48, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Mudbox32 sandbox model.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mudbox32 sandbox model.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eclipse[edit]

Many thanks for your positive comments. Alan Davidson 00:25, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 22:00, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vonage[edit]

Please use reliable sources, and maintain a neutral point of view in your edits. The source you provided is not anywhere close to meeting the requirements of a reliable source. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 00:56, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mudbox32 sandbox model.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mudbox32 sandbox model.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:31, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]