User talk:Gulliver888

Gulliver888, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Gulliver888! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Waternook (June 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

just advertising for a holiday let?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Waternook and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Waternook, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:03, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Waternook (July 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Hoary was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: If this place was "famously once owned by the Wedgwood family [25 March 1907 to 14 December 1933]" (unreferenced), then there'll be a great number of reliable, independent, published sources attesting to it. Hardly surprising that it "is clearly marked on the [sic] OS map": squillions of places are. And there's also "Part of Waternook's grounds, ‘the meadows’, have been recognised by expert ecologists [unspecified] as having real conservation value [of unspecified kinds] so have been deemed by Cumbria Wildlife Trust as a ‘County Wildlife Site’ within the Lake District National Park" (unsourced). These three claims appear to be the pretty much the only ones made here for this patch of land: the rest is about the wider area. This whole draft smacks of estate-agent-speak, aiming for a kind of distinction by association/allusion. This is unsurprising when we realize that this is the same "Waternook" as the subject of this unbridled promotional gush (sorry, only visible to administrators), very properly deleted by NawlinWiki back in 2012. The current draft is very much more discreet; but if it were somehow allowed to become an article it would just become a soft-sell PR puff for the commercial enterprise at waternookonullswater dot com.

Hoary (talk) 23:51, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Waternook[edit]

Hello, Gulliver888. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Waternook, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Waternook[edit]

Hello, Gulliver888. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Waternook".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:51, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]