User talk:Khutuck/Archive
WP[edit]
Kullanıcıların niteliğini hangi projede yer aldığı değil, ne yaptığı belirler~(user contribution'lara bakın). Sizinde WPKU, WPArmenia da yer almanızda yarar var.Selam.Kolay gelsin.Must.T C 20:55, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Re:[edit]
Hi there, the problem I found with your is that it's a non-sequiter, a logical fallacy you see. Despite the fact twenty countries recognize the genocide does not mean that 172 countries discount it as a fabrication. Asides from the Republic of Turkey and the Republic of Azerbaijan, no other country takes such an overt stance that the genocide did not occur. What would it matter to say, the people of the Republic of Palau, the issue of the Armenian Genocide? I doubt the Republic of Palau's foreign policy stretches that far much less even concerns itself with the country of Armenia or Armenians. You see the difference? Even in the United States, 40 out of the 50 states recognize the genocide while there is no federal recognition. Furthermore, your edit constitutes a misleading illogical argument: just because some countries do not recognize the genocide, doesn't mean they don't recognize de facto what had actually occurred as genocide for fear of political and economical retaliation by Turkey.
If I didn't revert you, someone else would have and they would be repeating the same things. Hope this clarifies things. Try to use the talk page next time when you want to add something so controversial or take it to the higher ups.--Marshal Bagramyan 02:08, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Selam[edit]
Mehraba ben Aniosgel. Takabeg ve kürt fa$ist arkada$lari yüzünden adminler oturumumu kapattilar. Katkilarimda hiç bir zaman Türk milliyetçligi öne sürmemi$imdir. Ancak Türkçe Wiki'de Takabeg, Hedda Gebler vs.. gibi insanlarin yüzünden wiki tr'ye gerçekten katki yapan insalar di$laniyo. Bunun ba$ka bir örnegi, sizin herhalde yakin arkada$iniz Maderibeyza'da bu kullanicilardan nasibini almi$. Lûtfen tanidiginiz adminlere laf atarsaniz iyi olur. Saygilar --81.64.4.97 (talk) 18:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
19 Mayıs[edit]
Selam. Nasıl gidiyor ? Yavuz'da dikta varmış :) Sen daha önce Atatürk'ün doğum tarihiyle ilgileniyordun ya. Ben şimdi Commemoration of Atatürk, Youth and Sports Day maddesini geliştirmeye çalışıyorum. Hatı Çırpan (Satı Kadın)'ın "Atatürk'ün Samsun'a çıktığı zaman doğdum." hikayesini google booksta hiç bulamıyorum. Onu yazmak için bölümü geliştirdim ama ... Rica etsem kaynakları bulabilir misin ? Uydurma filan mı acaba ? Eğer öyle ise ilgili bölümden vazgeçip Hatı Çırpan maddesini açabağım. Görüşmek üzere. İyi haftasonları. Takabeg (talk) 11:18, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- P.S. Yukarıdaki Aniosgel'in mesajını görmüş oldum. Ben Kürt faşist arkadaşlarının başını mı çekiyorum ? Yok yaaaaaaw, ben onlarla da mücadele ediyorum. Takabeg (talk) 11:20, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Template: POW[edit]
You do not need a source to explicitly state that someone is a "prisoner of war" to add this template, according to wikipedia rules: "This template is used to indicate commanders who were captured or surrendered in Infobox Military Conflict," and I am afraid we do not have different templates for insurgent leaders or army officers. For instance here POW is used for captured Iraqi-Kurdish Islamist insurgent commander Abu Abdullah al-Shafi'i while here it is used for captured Taliban commader Obaidullah Akhund and al-Qaeda commander Younis al-Mauritani, while here it is used for captured Palestinian (according Israelis) "terrorist" leader Ahmad Sa'adat. Therefore it is applicable for captured PKK commanders aswell, despite what your government may want to call them.Kermanshahi (talk) 11:35, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
There are no double standards on wikipedia, you can't use word tererorist because it is just POV and therefore the different combatants in a conflict cannot be treated differently by the objective user. Now the POW template, according wikipedia is for commanders that were captured. We do not apply different standards for insurgents and armies because that is POV, which is against WP rules. + Those other conflicts I showed as examples were exactly the same situation, insurgency conflicts and not "declared wars" between different countries. Now why can you not understand that POW is simply neutral term for captured, as used in all military conflict infoboxes in wikipedia? there is no rule that you have to find specifically that term stated somewhere just as with KIA template. So now, I will not let your anti-Kurdish biases affect the article.Kermanshahi (talk) 14:31, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
You do not need any sources that refer to him as a prisoner of war, merely sources that say he was captured. Which are provided in the article.Kermanshahi (talk) 16:42, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
I do not need any such sources, all that is needed is sources that say these people were captured/arrested by the Turksih government. I really don't know why it is so difficult for you to understand that the use of POW template is just simply for captured commanders (as is stated in the template's own article) and you think there is something special about the word. What other template do you suggest? And have you ever seen any other wikipedia article? Never before in Wikipedia history has someone made such an absurd claim to want a literal quote of the word "prisoner of war" to use the POW template. I do not know why you are so confused, but there are no ot her templates for this.Kermanshahi (talk) 17:16, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
You have no arguments that's the problem. This is not even an issue. The POW template was created for this purpose and it states so on the POW template page. I don't know what more to say to you. Never before has anyone even brought up such a strange discussion, why would you dispute the use of the POW template? And on what bases do you dispute it? Give me 1 reason why we should make an exception for this article, in not using the POW template for captured commanders? Just 1 reason. You can't. What youa re doing is so useless, why do you want to vandalise the infobox? We have no seperate template for captured isnrugents, how many times do I have to tell this to you! Kermanshahi (talk) 17:41, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
No! You have no right to demand such thing The POW Template article says it is to be used for all captured commanders, FACT! This fact is more important than your opinion, so you have no right to demand a source with such explicit wording. No, simply a source stating he was cpatured is enough. If you disagree, please take it up with the administrators and tell them to change the entire wikipedia policy for ALL ARTICLES, because until that happens you have no rigtht to remove these templates. It is just pure vandalism.Kermanshahi (talk) 17:50, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Captured=POW. I have many sources proven he was captured. I proved that on the POW template page it said this is for commanders which were captured. Which part of that is still unclear to you? Kermanshahi (talk) 18:02, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
And that POW templates are used for captured commanders in all cases, is not my "opinion" it is simply common wikipedia practice and it is stated on the template page that thsi is where the template was made for. I have broken no rules and done nothing POV at all by just applying the template for the exact reason it was made for (and is stated on the page). You are however deleting it to push your anti-Kurdish POV, which is vandalism and against wiki rules. I have nothing more to say to you. I simply will not allow you to vandalise the infobox, so take it up with an administrator if you want these POW templates removed. You will see (as I have already pointed out), however, that the rules are on my side and you are doing things that are unheared of.Kermanshahi (talk) 18:05, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Look, there is simply no other template for captured commanders. Therefore, there is no middle ground. There is just one template which everybody uses and which has never been a problem. Kermanshahi (talk) 18:16, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
See, the problem is: you say POW=/=captured, but Wikipedia says: "POW Template is used to indicate commanders who were captured or surrendered in Infobox Military Conflict" and therefore your opinion is irrelevant. And look, 'there is simply no other template for such prurpose the POW template is used in all cases, for all kind of conflicts and all king of combatants. You have no ground to stand on in saying that this case should be an exception.Kermanshahi (talk) 18:19, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
This is what I am telling you, POW template is used on wikipedia as a neutral term for any captured commander, weather he is from Turkey, US, Israel, Germany, Iran, ect. or from PKK, al-Qaeda, Taliban, Hamas, ect. and there are no exceptions made. Either you have to change the entire ways and also change all the other articles (because there is not a signle article in wikipedia were the POW template is not used for captured "terrorist" commanders and it has never been required to source this wording). You think an administrator is going to change these ways just for you? Good luck. Come back once you've managed to change the rules. Kermanshahi (talk) 18:33, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Sorry but I was getting really frustrated with the fact that you did not seem to understand the situation no matter what I said. Also, this article is constantly targetted by Turkish propagandists, which is no coincidence. I have been doing my best for years now to keep blatantly POV propaganda-style statements and claims (usually unsources) off these articles. And I have never before seen anyone taking issue with the POW template before.19:00, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Hey Khutuck, have you read the reference Kermanshahi added about Hizbullah? The reference puts Hizbullah into Turkey's side but with scepticism. Kavas (talk) 01:52, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Le Grand Duc[edit]
Kütükçüm, Türkçe Vikide Le Grand Duc (Fransızca Viki, (Le Grand Duc reklamı) maddesini açacak kullanıcı var mı ? tr:Kullanıcı:Makedon, tr:Kullanıcı:Totenkopf division'a sorar mısın ? Takabeg (talk) 09:16, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Six Armenian Vilayets[edit]
- Justin McCarthy (American historian) who you cited cannot be seen as neutral, see the article about him. He's a Armenian Genocide denier.
- "Reverted removal of French, there are no reliable sources that claim the French estimation was based on Ottoman estimation"
- What you mean?? Do you think that some author is going to state that "...this French estimation was based on Ottoman official census of 1914..."??? Of course not. It's just obvious. Just compare the two data sets. --Yerevanci (talk) 19:49, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- You know what?? Do just whatever you want to do. I don't care. If you gonna argue every single obvious thing, then I'm out. Consider this as a win. Be happy. And remember don't tell any Armenian not to be emotional about Armenian Genocide. You have no moral rights to say that. God bless you. --Yerevanci (talk) 13:10, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Re Kurdish-Turkish conflict move[edit]
Khutuck, it is unfortunate you did not weigh-in on this move during the nearly 6 weeks it was open. Merely saying the move should be reverted isn't going to work. If you sincerely believe the name should be changed, you are free to open an RM with the desired name. RMs are not binding, and any discussion aimed at reaching a better consensus is good. --Mike Cline (talk) 15:29, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
- What happened recently? I was away for 2-3 weeks. I think we can open a new RM discussion in upcoming months, it is not a good idea to start a new discussion so quickly. Kavas (talk) 23:56, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- Turkish-PKK conflict den ziyade Turkey-PKK conflict adı daha uygundur. Eskiden böyleydi kimseye danışılmadan değiştirildi.--Reality 02:46, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
RM-PKK[edit]
Kütük, Admin bana yazmis RM acin diye. Ben RM nedir bilemiyorum, radyoda FM kanallarini zor buluyorum. Ilginize... --E4024 (talk) 14:10, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Kermanshahi and Khutuck[edit]
A very experienced editor and one not so experienced, but around WP for a while should know better. The discussions at Talk:Kurdish–Turkish conflict will not be productive if you continue to snipe at each other with personal jibes. Both of you have been crossing the line with mild, but never the less, personal accusations about the other’s motives. This article Kurdish–Turkish conflict is about a real world situation. All sides of the conflict have their POV and in the spirit of WP:NPOV the article should contain a balance of those views. But even more importantly, in the spirit of WP:CIVILITY all those editors who are working on the article should be unconcerned and remain quiet about other editor’s political, cultural or personal beliefs. Making anything personal within WP unless it is praise, is a no win situation and does not contribute to improving the encyclopedia. I would encourage both of you to Bite Your Tongue whenever the urge to make something personal pops into your head. Thanks. No response required as I will be looking for tangible improvement in your actions, not idle words. --Mike Cline (talk) 13:58, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Khutuck. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Khutuck. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Feb 27 WikiWednesday Salon + Mar 2 MoMA Art+Feminism and beyond[edit]
| February 27, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC | |
|---|---|
 You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Metropolitan New York Library Council in Midtown Manhattan. Is there a project you'd like to share? A question you'd like answered? A Wiki* skill you'd like to learn? Let us know by adding it to the agenda. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming edit-a-thons, museum and library projects, education initiatives, and other outreach activities.
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Wikimedia New York City Team 09:00, 27 February 2019 (UTC) | |
| Saturday March 2: MoMA Art+Feminism Edit-a-thon | |
 Art+Feminism’s sixth-annual MoMA Wikipedia Edit-a-thon will take place at the Dorothy and Lewis B. Cullman Education and Research Building, The Museum of Modern Art, New York, 4 West 54 Street, on Saturday, March 2, 2019 from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. People of all gender identities and expressions are encouraged to attend. And on Sunday this weekend:
Stay tuned for other Art+Feminism and related edit-a-thons throughout the month! | |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
[edit]
| March 20, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC | |
|---|---|
|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Metropolitan New York Library Council in Midtown Manhattan. Is there a project you'd like to share? A question you'd like answered? A Wiki* skill you'd like to learn? Let us know by adding it to the agenda. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming edit-a-thons, museum and library projects, education initiatives, and other outreach activities.
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! This month, optional post-meetup drinks afterward at 9pm!--Wikimedia New York City Team 18:47, 19 March 2019 (UTC) | |
| Saturday March 23: Asian Art Archive/New York Public Library Art+Feminism Editathon | |
 Organized by Asia Art Archive in America]and Miriam and Ira D. Wallach Division of Art, Prints and Photographs of the New York Public Library and in collaboration with Asia Art Archive in Hong Kong, the Art+Feminism: Wikipedia Edit-a-thon on Women in Art in Asia helps participants edit Wikipedia to create and improve articles about women artists and practitioners in and from Asia, including architects, designers, filmmakers, curators, and art historians. Books and research materials—as well as refreshments—will be provided. Also check out other Art+Feminism and related edit-a-thons throughout the month! | |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
[edit]
| April 17, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC | |
|---|---|
|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Metropolitan New York Library Council in Midtown Manhattan. Is there a project you'd like to share? A question you'd like answered? A Wiki* skill you'd like to learn? Let us know by adding it to the agenda. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming edit-a-thons, museum and library projects, education initiatives, and other outreach activities.
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Wikimedia New York City Team 21:06, 3 April 2019 (UTC) | |
| Thursday April 4 and Friday April 5: Translat-a-thon NYC 2019 @ LaGuardia Community College | |
 Translat-a-thon NYC 2019 @ LaGuardia Community College is hosting the second annual Wikipedia Translatathon! At this event on Thursday evening and during the day Friday this week, anyone from the public is invited to LaGuardia to join students, professors, and CUNY faculty in translating Wikipedia articles among any languages which attendees understand. Themes for this event include public health and the history of New York City. New York City has a large immigrant population and great diversity of speakers of various languages. Among all schools in New York City, LaGuardia has the highest percentage of immigrant students, the highest percentage of students who speak a language other than English as their first language, and the greatest representation of language diversity. It is a strength of LaGuardia that it can present "Wikipedia translatathons", which are Wikipedia translation events. | |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)