User talk:Kopila Valley School

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: BlinkNow Foundation (July 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 03:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Kopila Valley School, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 03:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Hi there! It is about the entire foundation not just the school in Nepal. It has been cited in the New York Times and was in Floojte's documentary that aired in the Netherlands. Maggie Doyne, CNN her of the year 2016, is also the CEO of the foundation. Is there anything we can do to make this post accepted, or is it still too small of a scope?

Kopila Valley School (talk) 22:08, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kopila Valley School. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:57, 22 July 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:47, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hi there,

Can we

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Kopila Valley School (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

Old username seemed like it was from an organization not a personKopila Valley School (talk) 18:35, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. I hope the use of "we" doesn't indicate that multiple people have access to this account; that's not permitted. Huon (talk) 00:51, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]