User talk:Leujohn/Archive 3 (December 2008-March 2010)

• 2
• Archive 3
• 4

Course completion problems

Can't I be inactive as in completing courses and submitting assignments this month?Semester exams are going on and they run till 7th Jan! :( EaswarH (talk) 09:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the leeway.Cool. EaswarH (talk) 10:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

First required assignment done.Thanks for the leeway again.:)EaswarH (talk) 17:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

How do you nominate an editor to be banned?

One user Imranb35 is persistently doing vandalism,and POV edits despite his contributions being repeatedly undone by different editors and warnings on his talk page.How do you nominate someone to be banned?EaswarH (talk) 07:14, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Do you mean steps to give warnings?If so,I would prefer I not be the person to give him a warning,because the controversial edits involve Indo-Pak affairs,and since I'm from India,my warning would be probably be considered non-NPOV itself.EaswarH (talk) 13:59, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

The citation IS the problem.Said events took place before I was born,and I'm no defence expert.And I can't possibly use Indian Military version,assuming I can find them,because that again is not NPOV.That's why I'm leaving it to the people who do know about these defence matters.EaswarH (talk) 06:38, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your careful consideration at my successful RfA. Please let me know on my talk page if you have any suggestions for me. - Dan Dank55 (send/receive) 04:01, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Vltava 68 is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--Vltava 68 10:17, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Well, we've had our HS concert, so it isn't that early. Cheers! Vltava 68 10:17, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Toyah Willcox

Hullo,

I edited Toyah Willcox's page last week and you said you'd revert it, but you didn't :)

Another question, How do I reply tou your replies? Or do I make another topic?

Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.44.197.132 (talk) 13:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

Hello there. You expressed a wish in your neutral vote to see me answer Question 5 on my RfA; I just wanted to let you know that I have now answered that question, and so you may now wish to consider how you would like to vote in light of that. It Is Me Here ^{t / c} 22:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

late on lessons i know.

I am overwhelmed with my other classes, outside of Wiki, so i havent started them yet, is that OK?

Ill try to do some soon. Thanks Dcollins52 (talk) 18:13, 10 December 2008 (UTC) I will start after the new year? THanks for understanding! Dcollins52 (talk) 16:36, 12 December 2008 (UTC) Cuz Ill be in NC in 3 or 4 weeks, and almost no internet there. So ill start when I get back. Thanks. Dcollins52 (talk) 21:19, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

RfA thankspam

		Thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which failed with 61/52/7; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral. Special thanks go out to Wizardman and Malinaccier for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board. Thanks again for the trust the community has placed in me. A special Christmas song for you all can be found at the right hand side of this message! Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Dendodge TalkContribs, 17:30, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Review of Article Quality

How can I get someone to review the quality of the article for Poptropica? It seems better than start class now. Vltava 68 09:45, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

DCollins52Tell me what you think is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

apologies

im sorry for any offensive messages i did or did not place on ur page.

Dcollins52^{Tell me what you think} has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!=)
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

editor review for me

I know i may be early but please participate you can find my editor review at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editor_review/DCollins52

please tell me what to work on. Cheers Dcollins52^{Tell me what you think} 18:48, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

RfA votes

I dunno. To break the monotony, I guess? I'm a bit strange that way. :P Why do you ask? Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :D} 12:40, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Lol, that would be amusing. No, I'm just odd. :D Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :D} 14:08, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

offensive messages??

what do you mean? Sorry, just let me know what you find offensive. once I know what messages Wikipeda and/or you find offensive, I will make sure not to post things like that again., and no I didnt know about WP:COOL Thanks! I hope not to run into more misunderstandings, with anyone, especially my adopted WikiDad lol. subst: Smile

Cheers,Dcollins52^{Tell me what you think} 23:03, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Spice Girls Billboard Boxscore

Hi, i read on the Spice Girls Comeback Tour page that you edited the Billboard Boxscore page. What i wanted to know was how did you find their tour grosses for Spain and Germany when i didn't think they had been reported to Billboard? Thanks, Stephen,User:StephenN17 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.102.103.14 (talk) 20:02, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Photos

John, how do u post photos? I wanna post some for ICS. So, yeah... --Florence Lau 14:31, 24 December 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Florencelau (talk • contribs)

GA: Treasure Planet

Thank you so much for reviewing and passing Treasure Planet! That totally made my Christmas day. Thanks again, and happy holidays to you! :D --SilentAria ^talk 09:48, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

GA: Mongolian language

I already posted such a comment on the review page, but as I'm not sure if you're watching it, I'll post it here as well:

I originally fancied that the article on Mongolian language is rather thoroughly sourced, so I am surprised that it should not pass on exactly this criterion. Well, I'm not totally surprised as most of the content predated the reference and I was very busy adding a great lot of references for previously unsourced material. Now there should be little if any problems to supply missing citations - in principle. But in practice, I did check this article for missing quotations quite a few times and I think it is unlikely that I find exactly the information that you still considered unreferenced. Thus, it would be of extraordinary importance that you point out just where you think citations are missing. The [citation needed]-template would do the job. If you do so, I shall be able to supply all missing citations or delete the unsourced content until 2009-1-10, probably earlier. But as vague as it is now, I'm unable to make use of your critique and improve the article. G Purevdorj (talk) 22:32, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

This is a bit late, I know, but I really feel this could use commenting. Overall, the article was decently sourced. The main issue was the lack of citations in "Phonology", but failing an article outright for that isn't helpful. You might very well have made a very thorough review, but the lack of any motivations with more detail than "not enough citations" made your decision seem rather gratutious. Please try spending more time when reviewing other people's hard work.

Peter ^Isotalo 07:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Jennifer Brunner GAR

Jennifer Brunner has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 14:35, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

It isn't obvious to me that anyone at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Jennifer Brunner/1 has figured out what things you thought were POV in the paragraphs you cited in the review. Would you care to point out which things you felt were POV in each of the paragraphs that you mentioned.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

If you have any intent to be helpful, point out a sentence or two from each paragraph that you said was POV. Then, I can fix them.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 06:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Last I looked, no one could point out any of the POV in the sections you noted in your review. I need help fixing the article. Please point to the stuff you were talking about, so I can fix it.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 06:13, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Editor Review

I put up an editor review for myself a few days ago; would you mind commenting? (It still seems rather blank, apart from my answered questions.) There are links on my user and talk pages. Vltava 68 02:13, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

How about now? Vltava 68 07:39, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Per your request: A review

This review is done with the thought that the candidate is contemplating an RfA in the not too distant future as indicated on my talk page/email. This is a different type of review than one might receive at an editor review. When I perform this type of review, I do so, as the thoughts come to mind:

• So far your CSD work appears to be better than most. You've properly used G1 on articles that are actually nonsense, which is where a lot of people mess up. Many of the tags seem to be correct.
• Ooops, I spoke too soon, you tagged an article G1. An article that begins with, Health Research, Incorporated (HRI) is a not-for-profit corporation affiliated with the New York State Department of Health (DOH) and the Roswell Park Center Institute (RPCI). HRI's mission is to assist DOH and RPCI to effectively evaluate, solicit, and administer external financial support for the DOH and RPCI projects. In addition, HRI disseminates the benefits of DOH expertise through programs such as technology transfer. This article does not fit the criteria for G1 in any way shape or form. Did you mean A7? A7 does not require that the entity meet Notability guidelines, in fact it explicity states that the entity only has to make a credible claim at "importance or significance." As such, the lead sentence to this article does just that. HRI's mission is to assist the NYDOH "evaluate, solicit, and administer external financial support" that is a claim of importance/significance---again, avoiding A7 does NOT equate to avoiding deletion via a PROD/CSD.
• You then nomed a second article for A7, Tecnotoon Animation Cluster is a 2d animation production company based in Mexico, City, Mexico. To date, the studio has earned many local awards, acknowledgments and achievements. Tecnotoon Animation Cluster appears to be a legit company and Tecnotoon Animation Univeristy appears to be a real university! So that saves them from the vandalism fate, I expected to see. So what about the A7? The second sentence includes, "the studio has earned many local awards, acknowledgments and achievements." AND Tecnotoon was a high-end maquila company whose core product was the outsourcing fine 2d animation... traditional 2-D animation was still the dominant medium for feature animated films. (I suspect the past tense is due to a language difference, I suspect the original writer is from Mexico.)
• This is a personal preference, but I hate reviewing talk pages like yours. By not holding conversations on one page, people end up jumping all over creation to see what is happening. This can be particularly challenging when 3 or 4 people get involved in one discussion and it is going on on 3 or 4 different pages.
• I see that Malinaccier reviewed you back in November. He gave you some excellent advice.
• You seem to be very reliant upon tools.
• Your participation in Wikipedia and Wikipedia Talk spaces are almost non-existent.
• Don't rush to adminship. A lot of your edits seem to have the eye on becoming an admin. While it isn't bad to see the value of the tools, the fact that you started working on RfAs and making coaching requests so early into your wikicareer, it sends the impression that you are seeking the tools for the wrong reasons.
• You really need to help build the project in some way shape or form. Without some experience building the project, you don't really understand it.

That being said, my overall impression is positive. A few things to work on.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloonCSD Survey Results 05:42, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

GA: Mongolian language2

Dear John! Since you reviewed Mongolian language, 40 new in-line references (about thirty of these pertaining to old material). Some pretty obvious things got references that I earlier felt weren't necessary, but user Gnangarra showed me that it was possible to see a lack of references here, and some stuff was referenced that really was in need of references, including the deletion of one and the modification of two sentences. Moreover, the section on phonology has been expanded and some pictures have been added. I wouldn't want you to press you to justify concerns that you still might have, but if you read over it and find that your previous concerns have indeed been addressed, you might promote it. Best regards, G Purevdorj (talk) 10:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Strange article

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planetary_gearing Some places obviously have to have math formulas,but what's coming is an error message.I initially thought it was vandalism,but found that it's actually an error message.What's supposed to be done?Report to the admins? EaswarH (talk) 15:53, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Oops,sorry.That's fixed.I though I would put all my conversations with you together.I get the error message:

   * Failed to parse (Cannot write to or create math output directory):EaswarH (talk) 13:32, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

And I reported that page at the VPT too.EaswarH (talk) 13:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

I tried bypssing my browser cache(Ctrl+Shift+R on my FF) and it didn't work.WP:VPT told me to do WP:PURGE which worked.EaswarH (talk) 13:57, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Leujohn. You have new messages at Optakeover's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

When's the next lesson.....

whether compulsory or optional;expected?:) EaswarH (talk) 13:57, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Response at User_talk:Kgasso

Hello, Leujohn. You have new messages at Kgasso's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mangalorean Catholics at WP:GAN#SOC

It has been nearly a month that you kept the article on Review, and I haven't heard anything from you at Talk:Mangalorean Catholics/GA2. Freind, I don't know whether you even remember that you have kept the article on Review. If you do not have enough time or not interested, then May I suggest you to remove your name from WP:GAN#SOC, so that some other willing reviewer takes the article. The article was nominated on 3 November 2008 (before nearly 3 months) and is still the oldest nomination without a review. Thanks, Kensplanet^T_C 12:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

uw-vand vs. uw-lang

I noticed your warning[1] at User talk:Dtunnicliff. However the edit in question[2], the visible text was not changed; instead the links were changed to similar looking, but nonsense, words. —Sladen (talk) 13:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Notability of TVNZ MEDIA

A tag has been placed on TVNZ MEDIA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. AndrewHowse (talk) 18:33, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

This is a redirect page. Vltava 68 06:24, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Leujohn, I notified you because you had requested deletion earlier in its history. As above, it's now a redirect. Apologies if it was unwelcome. Cheers, --AndrewHowse (talk) 19:38, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

RE:Editor Review

I actually rarely don't use the edit summary thingy. (The exception may be the "new section" thing on talk pages, but that's because they don't have a box for the edit summary. Vltava 68 06:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Can you say WP:DTR? I knew you could...

Could you please refrain from dropping templates on my talk page for reverts I am making while in the process of vandalism reverting? Thanks. Trusilver 04:54, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

And some advice for you to consider or ignore as you will. I have looked over your talk page and your user page and since you seem to be practically fishing for someone to nominate you to adminship, I want you to consider this: While not everyone agrees with me and there will be those that will vote you down for the most inane and unpredictable of reasons (your age is one of them, be prepared for that), I only have one criteria at all for giving the tools to someone: Can you be trusted to implement them correctly.

I think this experience shows very poorly on you. You show a lack of situational awareness that I find a little bit disturbing. You made the decision to template me without doing any research at all. I know you did no research at all because you made your bad judgment in the same two minute period that you made eleven other edits. Had you gone into the history of Hip Hop, your accusation of me edit warring stems from a single edit (the only one I have ever made on that article) to remove vandalism here[3]. You would also have seen that you even reverted more vandalism BACK TO MY VERSION a short time later. From what I see in your edit history, you are too quick to rely on Huggle to make your decisions for you. I then went through your edits over only the last half hour and found two other inaccurate reverts and warnings that you gave others.[4][5] You are placing edit count ahead of real quality edits. Had this not been the case, you would be making sure you are doing your homework before making potentially bad decisions. But that can all be summed up as one of those "oops, shit. My bad" moments and are easily overlooked. What I don't overlook is your complete refusal to acknowledge your mistake and apologize for it. You show bad judgment and try to disguise it with zealousness.

In other words... Slow down. There is no race for the finish line on Wikipedia. Pay more care to what you are doing and remember that if you don't catch something, there are fifteen other people all watching recent changes right now that will catch it. Trusilver 05:44, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

why did you template me?

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:59.171.66.109&diff=prev&oldid=266257684

was it because I didn't bother logging in and you assumed that as an IP I was just causing problems? - that I would understand, I view IPs with some suspicion - however you might want to check the actual edit before reverting.

or was it because I changed the sock template? The original was placed by me (logged in as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sennen_goroshi) that was placed when I started the sock investigation - the next template was put there by me again, when the investigation concluded that the user was a sock and banned the account indef.

If you want to respond to this message please do either on this page, or on the talk page of my Sennen Goroshi account - I don't check the IP page that often, infact I only use IP to edit when I forget to login. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 07:11, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Contributions List

Why is it that I can't see my contributions in deleted articles? Are they still counted? Vltava 68 13:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for the trust you placed in me by supporting my RfA (which passed and, apparently, I am now an admin!). I will do my best to continue to act in a way that is consistent with the policies of wikipedia as well with our common desire to build and perfect this repository of human knowledge; and can only hope that you never feel that your trust was misplaced. Thanks again!--Regent's Park (Rose Garden) 00:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Mongolian language

Hi Leujohn -

At the end of December you reviewed Mongolian language for GA status. You then requested a second opinion, which was sort of provided by a second editor. Are you still waiting for more comments on this article? If so, I'll go ahead and do it, but I wasn't sure if you were still active in the review of this article. Thanks! Dana boomer (talk) 15:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Vote

When I wrote the statement "only using a username when necessary, or to participate in discussions", I was referring to the past, and it is written in the past tense. For what it is worth, the only reason I segment my contributions is because I am only willing to contribute to WP under the condition of anonymity, something that would be extremely unlikely if I did not segment them. Fortunately Wikipedia has a very good privacy policy, but that is only half of the equation. And yes I know that IP editing is far less anonymous than using a registered username. However, most of my 5 to 10 thousand edits are as an IP user, so I see no reason to change now. You know, I make so many edits, that when I put in a website, and have to solve the captcha, not only is the first word often something that my browser recognizes, I have seen both words before sometimes (in that same order). Apteva (talk) 23:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Selective Course

Referring to the selective course, "How To Keep the Puzzle together",I'm using Firefox 3.0.5 on Ubuntu 8.10.Please update the page on my user subpage accordingly.Thanks. :) EaswarH (talk) 06:50, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

ICS Image

Maybe you can upload the logo? I put up an infobox on the ICS page, so maybe that would be useful... Vltava 68 11:04, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

I've got the template thingy (or rather, the typing needed) in my sandbox. I'm not sure about some fields. Vltava 68 13:54, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

I've added the image. It's rather blurry. Vltava 68 12:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

SVG Logos

{{helpme}} Can fair-use logos be in SVG? Leujohn ^(talk) 11:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes, see for example File:Microsoft wordmark.svg. But it depends on the logo in question. You might want to check Wikipedia:Logos and ask for further help at Wikipedia:SVG Help or Wikipedia:Media copyright questions or the general help desk. It is more likely that someone with more knowledge can answer it there than that such a person notices the helpme-tag. Regards SoWhy 12:16, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Egg (food) - Thiamin

Hi Leujohn. Informal mediation of this question was requested; I've started a discussion on the article's talk page if you'd like to discuss. mjec ^(t/c/p) 05:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Keeping the puzzle together

Completed. :) EaswarH (talk) 15:53, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

User page

I would like to adopt a simpler design for my user page. Are there any examples that would be worth noting? Vltava 68 09:30, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Reverting Vandalism part2

I'm using the Cologne Blue Skin on Wikipedia.EaswarH (talk) 15:03, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Comments on Mediation

See the further comments I have made. They are to do with copy and paste, blog site and saying ISBN numbers are obsufication. Thanks --Sikh-history (talk) 11:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

So how do we proceed from here?--Sikh-history (talk) 16:33, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Note the Sock Puppet investigation here has come up positive for Khalsaburg. --Sikh-history (talk) 22:40, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

A bit harsh giving me a final warning for this comment I made. If I did that to all the editors I came across making such comments, I would ban/block half of wikipedia :p . Cheers --Sikh-history (talk) 22:08, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

I really cannot see where I have been offensive over 4 times? --Sikh-history (talk) 06:58, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Agreed that I did make some comments but you will also note my apologies. Sometimes things are said in the heat of the moment. Especially faced with a barrage of insults. Speak to the editor Sineed. Thanks --Sikh-history (talk) 08:41, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Phi Beta Kappa Society

Hello, Leujohn. I've seen the Mediation Cabal case requested for Phi Beta Kappa Society here, and I'm glad to take the case. It appears that you have engaged in discussion about the issue, and I have listed you as a party. I have reviewed the relevant discussions and am looking forward to working towards an ultimate resolution. Regards, Jd027 (talk) 15:25, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

User Sikh-History sockpuppet

Can you also check the following user: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/92.238.29.55 and user:sikh-history, if they are the same??

Here he says he doesn't wish to create a new account (below) yet he's the same user and has been editing 3HO and changing everything from AKJ to 3HO to fit in with his own agenda(s). I will return to this but to cut a long story short, I edit from a library.

Quote from here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sinneed/Archive_2&action=edit "Hi friend, I have been watching an edit war going on. This user appears to be trying to add vast amounts of extremist Sikh POV. I noticed from the Sikh Extremist thread (which has great edits from you) taht you know about Sikh affairs. Could you watch this fellows edits. I don't wish to get involved or make an account. --92.238.29.55 (talk) 14:33, 25 February 2009 (UTC)"

If you can also look at the same talk page of uswer:Sineed re:ISBN and obfuscation, hopefully you wont be forced to take a one sided view. Thanks Khalsaburg (talk) 15:40, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi Leujohn, the warning you gave to Sikh-History seems to have been deleted by him without any resolution, yet he maintains its 'resolved' ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASikh-history&diff=285413758&oldid=282932408

Thank you. Khalsaburg (talk) 10:27, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Completing "Keeping the puzzle together":Part2

While I had problems getting the Twinkle javascript to run,when I was using the other skin,I switched to Monobook and got Twinkle installed(finally).After all that,I forgot the instructions in the 1st part of this lesson on how to find vandalism.I think it was something to do with a wikipedia-wide recent changes page,but can't seem to find it to do the required number of reverts using Twinkle.Where should I find this Recent Changes page again?EaswarH (talk) 09:07, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Oh well,no longer.No problem.I found it.EaswarH (talk) 09:09, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Um,can't see any vandal edits just now.Everything looks like AGF to me.EaswarH (talk) 09:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Making user boxes

John, how do you make the userboxes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Florencelau (talk • contribs) 00:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Completing "Keeping the puzzle together:Part2" REDUX

Does reversion of two continuous vandal edits by the same person in just one instance of Twinkle count as two reverted edits for my target,or just one?EaswarH (talk) 16:54, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Then I guess I'm done.EaswarH (talk) 14:06, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Are you the author of magnetocardiography? Do you read Peskin/McQueen? If you are one and the same I would be interested in private correspondence regarding mutual observations.--lbeben 23:38, 18 May 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lbeben (talk • contribs)

Vandalism

I was NOT vandalising the pages.

I was adding an Template - A pretty useful tool to get from article to article of a certain category.

Paid Editing?

What's your stand? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Paid_Editing EaswarH (talk) 05:30, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Course "When to throw trash away" completed

EaswarH (talk) 04:31, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello?

Uh,what about checking the completed course?EaswarH (talk) 07:21, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Oh not a problem.Was just wondering where you got to,without a wikibreak template too.:) EaswarH (talk) 15:02, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Motto of the Day

Hi there, Leujohn! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.

MOTD Needs Your Help!

Delivered By –pjoef (talk • contribs) 07:26, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Are you still active in WikiProject Orphanage?

Hi there, I noticed you haven't done any de-orphaning in a while. I'm currently cleaning up the member list at WP:ORPHANAGE, and have moved you to the Inactive list. If you still wish to be listed as "Active" just go ahead and move your name back. Regards, œ^™ 21:10, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Terry Moran

Hi there.

I edited the Terry Moran article noting the controversy with his publishing of an off-the-record interview. I sourced The Politico for the edit. You reverted the edit saying that The Politico is not a reliable source. Is this Wikipedia policy? I find this strange...

Thanks... Peter --69.153.12.112 (talk) 03:02, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Here are 2 links;

[6]

[7]

Thanks. Peter --69.153.12.112 (talk) 03:13, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for reverting the personal attacks off of my talk page before even I could do them warrior4321 03:37, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Esperanto Wikipedia

A few months ago, you rated the Esperanto Wikipedia a C-class article. According to C-class description, "Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study." Could you please tell me what criteria you used to evaluate it as a C-class article, and some of the article's shortcomings? I would like to improve the article based on your thoughts. Thanks! -- Yekrats (talk) 19:30, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

I'm not sure if it was actually you, but thanks for pointing me towards creating an account. I already have one, and merely have not logged in.

Thanks,

86.154.31.197 (talk) 14:58, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

I wanted to sign that with my actual username, but I couldn't figure out how! It is SCIAG. [User talk:SCIAG]

Ping

Thank you for your time and curiosity. As a gesture of appreciation, may I share a rhetorical question from the Analects of Confucius: "Is it not pleasant to learn with a constant perseverance and application?" --Tenmei (talk) 15:48, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Two rakan evoke a teachable moment, searching together for a focal point?

May I offer a proposal? Please consider replacing your username with your signature (four tildes ~~~~) in the list of "active mentors" at User talk:Tenmei/Sub-page Alerts. This is necessary step in a constructive direction.

You may find that what I'm asking for is probably less than you imagine in the short term, or perhaps more than you anticipate in the long term. --Tenmei (talk) 06:47, 1 February 2010 (UTC)