User talk:Mostafa bakry

welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm afraid I'm going to have to start off your talk page with a request:

Please don't remove the picture of the woman next to the large Qur'an page from the Qur'an article. If the museum lets women in shorts look at Qur'an pages (she's not even TOUCHING it!) and Muslims aren't picketing the museum, then a picture of her looking at the page is not wrong.

It's a rocky start, but you could go on to do great things. Takes a while to get the hang of the rules here. Jwissick ^(t)^(c) 01:06, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the image. If you have a problem with the image, please discuss it on Qur'an:Talk. Continued removal without discussion is the same as vandalism and can get you blocked. Jwissick ^(t)^(c) 02:44, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. What issue do you take with the image? Thanks. El_C 20:39, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't pay any mind, she just wanted a chance to rvt it back into the article, that means a sockpuppet was required to remove it in the first place, otherwise it would be a one-sided edit war, now wouldn't it -- anon 03:18, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

I'm waiting for a response from the sockpuppet in question, oddly, not getting one -- anon

What? Are you suggesting she's using a pro and anti sockpuppets and reverting herself? Also, I presume this isn't Mostafa bakry (?). El_C 04:36, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Am I being subtle or something? -- anon

It's somewhat impolite to answer a question with a question, no? Nice sig, btw! El_C 05:09, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you guys always talk in riddles? :) Kaldari 16:13, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leave it be.[edit]

The image is currently being discussed and it's fate determined. If you wish to chime in, then do so... Till then leave the image alone. Jwissick ^(t)^(c) 06:12, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Three-revert rule[edit]

Please read WP:3RR. Please enter the discussion on the future of the image rather than blind reverting. JeremyA 06:19, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

blocked for 3RR[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. Coming to agreement and consensus is important. Elle vécut heureusement _{toujours dorénavant} (Be eudaimonic!) 07:23, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't like when people edit war with themselves, it's silly -- anon