User talk:Nordicmagpie
| This user is a student editor in University_of_Wyoming/Architectural_History_(Fall_2018) . |
Welcome![edit]
Hello, Nordicmagpie, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:49, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Nordicmagpie Peer Review[edit]
Hi! I really enjoyed your article overall. I was impressed by some of the details you were able to find on the architecture of the building, since this building was built so long ago. I suspect it was hard to find information on a building from so long ago. However if you were able to find the main architect/client I think that would help your article. I also would make the "St. John Portal" a link to more information when mentioned in your history paragraph. I also would work on your sources somewhat. Finding books at the library or on their database of journals would help back your article more and give more specific information. Overall I found your article very informative and am impressed by some of the details you were able to provide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ggordon3 (talk • contribs) 04:07, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Peer Review of Carrara Cathedral[edit]
Overall this wikipedia article has gained valuable information for a cathedral that is several centuries old and fairly obscured due to the more well known cathedrals throughout the world receiving more attention. The information was well organized, and there are only a few nitpicks that I will go ahead and put out there. The information with the title "Overview" I felt could have been titled a bit differently, but this is not a very necessary thing to change. It is overall a title for physical information on the building, and not its history, so there is not as likely to be confusion from readers in the long run. Another small critique I have is there are are some additional terms that could have been hyperlinked such as "presbytery" and "façade," and I say this as it gives just additional means for readers to do deep searching if they don't know what various things are. These are just minor nitpicks though, and they do not degrade the contributions you were able to make.