User talk:Pfarla

Pfarla, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Pfarla! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ceuta has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ceuta was changed by Pfarla (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.917784 on 2015-09-03T17:55:38+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:55, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

May 2017

Because of your recent edit warring on multiple articles, including Climate of Europe and Iberian Peninsula, as well as violations of the non-free content policy by adding non-free images to articles without creating the required fair use rationales for each usage, I've blocked your account for 24 hours. If you believe this block to be in error, you may follow the process outlined at Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:27, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

@Juliancolton: Thanks for showing me the true face of Wikipedia and the kind of Cosa Nostra who administrate this. I'm ashamed of myself that I gave 10€ to Wikipedia. One user is doing any kind of changes he wants against the word of 3 users and you block me for EDIT WARRING? Me? The one who agrees with other 2 users against one? Ok then, thanks. I think I will never edit again in this website. This is too much of a dictatorship. You don't even follow your own rules, no one made a consensus with him but you agree with him. Thanks, really thanks! --Pfarla (talk) 03:30, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

I hope that you don't leave but that is your choice. As I've already mentioned before at files for discussion. Wikipedia is not a democracy and consensus for what I did is well established in the non-free content guideline, the fair use rationale guideline, and the fair use criteria policy. That is where the consensus is coming from and copyright policy is a really really big deal here. Three people at FFD does not override years of community consensus that is the way it is for specific legal reasons regarding copyright. I didn't have a choice but to enforce it and I tried to get you to stop. I hope that we can solve this amicably. I would be happy to explain our copyright policies to you if you want. --Majora (talk) 03:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Spain

@Pfarla: Please user Pfarla take good faith in my edits, I didnt wanted to delete Spain as " Cultural superpower", the sources before have talked about only " cultural power" no "Super power". LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 21:44, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

@LuigiPortaro29: one of the sources is adressing as a cultural superpower for the influence in the whole American continent starting in the southern US all the way down to the end of South America.

I've also seen that other user has been discussing this with you and reaches finally a consensus with Spain remaining there, and many months later you deleted it for no reason and breaking the last consensus about that topic. Why? Regards. --Pfarla (talk) 07:39, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

@Pfarla: Hello Pfarla sorry if I have deleted Spain from the list , maybe I didn't see in a right way the source?, well , I agree with you about the term of Cultural Superpower, Spanish language is one of the key of the Spanish success!.Regards!.LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 11:57, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andorra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Immigrants vs. foreigners

Hey there! Just wanted to let you know that the data for 2022 includes foreigners living in Portugal, regardless of their country of birth (including those born in Portugal). If you're specifically looking for immigration data (people born outside Portugal), I suggest checking out the Eurostat website. Foreigners make up 7.5% of the population, immigrants 11.5% Miguel01Cruzado (talk) 14:42, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello Miguel, thank you for your information. Then feel free to make the proper changes you want, maybe changing just Nationality instead of ethnic group? As we certainly know that the Portuguese Nationality is 92.53% and 7.47% are foreigners. I would simplify to 92.5% Portuguese and 7.5% foreign. Do you think it's better this way? Pfarla (talk) 21:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi Pfarla, I apologize for the oversight and for not replying earlier. Thank you for sharing your idea. I completely agree with your suggestion of using "Nationality" instead of "ethnic group." It's a more accurate representation of the subject. I have taken your advice and made the necessary changes accordingly, I based my edit on the "France" article. I appreciate your help in making the article better. If you have any further suggestions or ideas, feel free to share them. Thank you once again! Miguel01Cruzado (talk) 16:21, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Reply

We don't do WP:SYNTH regarding source interpretation. We present the information the way sources we cite do. Special care about source distortion should be applied vis-à-vis handling primary sources such as the one it is used in that article. There is no imperative to present information the way other articles do (via the aforementioned synth violation), because those other articles are sourced with other sources, presumably bringing other answers to a question about religious beliefs (perhaps not just not the same answer, but not even the same question, go figure). "Source integrity" prevails over problematic harmonization of articles via synthesis.--Asqueladd (talk) 13:38, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Well, that is true. All is shown inside that source and there is no use of 2 different sources to reach that point so there is no WP:SYNTH there. Good point! Pfarla (talk) 19:22, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)