User talk:Richard75/Archive 2023

Nomination of Democracy (Judge Dredd storyline) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Democracy (Judge Dredd storyline) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democracy (Judge Dredd storyline) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:02, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Concerning Heraclius

You are correct in pointing out that the title basileus became increasingly common under Heraclius, but the claim that he outright replaced Imperator, Caesar and Augustus with Basileus is not. A notable example is Leo VI the Wise, who, in his own Basiliska (A collection of Byzantine law that he authored), introduces himself explicitly as "Autokrator Kaisar Phlábios Léōn Augoustos" (Imperator Caesar Flavius Leo Augustus). The title "augoustos" remained in use, IIRC, as late as the reign of Manuel I. Michael III and Basil I also had coins issued with the Latin titles "imperator" and "augustus" on them, even if they are the exception instead of the rule.

Even the assumption that Heraclius replaced Latin with Greek entirely is a stretch. Heraclius issued edicts in Greek, but I do not recall him ever issuing a law that explicitly ejected Latin from administration entirely and mandated use of Greek. The Hellenization of the empire certainly did not start with Heraclius; Arcadius had already issued an edict to allow provincial governors to legislate in Greek, and Leo I began doing so at the imperial level, issuing laws in Koine Greek rather than Late Latin. This also ignores the fact that even post-Heraclius, Latin retained administrative use in the exarchates, even if it vanished from the core provinces.

Essentially, while it is correct that Heraclius legislated increasingly in Greek and increasingly used the title basileus, I am very skeptical of the claims that he explicitly and legally abolished administrative use of Latin or ceased use of the old Latin titles entirely. This video summarizes it quite well. LVDP01 (talk) 13:11, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Creating a separate page of House of Lords Reform Act 2014

Hi I am creating a separate page for Retired and Remove members of the House of Lords, like what the 1999 list is like.

List of peers retired and removed under the House of Lords Reform Act 2014

Yours faithfully

Earl of Sutton Coldfield (talk) 10:06, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

What's the point? Richard75 (talk) 13:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

It looks better as you can see from this prime exanple List of hereditary peers removed under the House of Lords Act 1999 Earl of Sutton Coldfield (talk) 15:32, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Aesthetically speaking, it looks great. What I meant is, the list of members who have retired from the House of Lords since 2014 is open-ended, because more people will keep retiring indefinitely into the future. It's already huge, and will keep getting bigger. We don't keep a list like this for the House of Commons, or for the legislature of any other country. So what do we need it for? (The list of peers removed in 1999 is a one-off event; that list is complete.) Richard75 (talk) 16:13, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

I agree, it doesn't seem necessary, aside maybe from the ones removed for non attendance, but that can go on the main article for the act. 2601:249:9301:D570:909A:F52B:67C2:D58 (talk) 22:07, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

I have an idea, if you look at List of Desert Island Discs episodes and you see it is a subpage itos done by decade and could we try that with Section 1. Earl of Sutton Coldfield (talk) 06:31, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

It now appears that List of peers retired under the House of Lords Reform Act 2014 (2014–2020) and List of peers retired under the House of Lords Reform Act 2014 (2021–present) were created, which I think have pretty the same issue as the already discussed page. 64.107.163.147 (talk) 16:21, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

It will be easier to maintain Earl of Sutton Coldfield (talk) 17:31, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

The issue isn’t maintenance, it’s whether it has notability. As he pointed out, no other legislature has lists of those who resigned. 64.107.163.147 (talk) 18:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

I have an idea if you think it's is good, because if you have one for each decade it may work:

• List of peers retired and removed under the House of Lords Reform Act 2014 (2014–2020)
• List of peers retired and removed under the House of Lords Reform Act 2014 (2021–present)

I want to come to a compromise Earl of Sutton Coldfield (talk) 14:35, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Charles III requested move discussion

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 06:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Other British monarch requested move discussions currently taking place

Since you recently participated in the Charles III requested move discussion, I thought you might like to know that there are two other discussions currently going on about other British monarch article titles here and here. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:23, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Doomsday Scenario

The article The Doomsday Scenario has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:09, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Judgement Day (Judge Dredd)

The article Judgement Day (Judge Dredd) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of City of the Damned

The article City of the Damned has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:12, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of City of the Damned for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article City of the Damned is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City of the Damned until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Judgement Day (Judge Dredd) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Judgement Day (Judge Dredd) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judgement Day (Judge Dredd) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of The Doomsday Scenario for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Doomsday Scenario is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Doomsday Scenario until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:33, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of The Judge Child for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Judge Child, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Judge Child until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Judge (2000 AD) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Judge (2000 AD), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judge (2000 AD) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Day of Chaos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Day of Chaos, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Day of Chaos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Council of Five.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Council of Five.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Judge Child.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Judge Child.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bloodfang, fictional dinosaur from Eagle comic.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bloodfang, fictional dinosaur from Eagle comic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:City of the Damned.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:City of the Damned.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Long Walk (Judge Dredd).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Long Walk (Judge Dredd).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:21, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rookie Judge Kraken.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rookie Judge Kraken.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:22, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Judge (2000 AD) into Mega-City One. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:03, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Requested move discussion

There is currently a Request Move discussion about William IV. Since you participated in the previous move discussion involving William IV, I thought you might want to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation on Habeas Corpus Suspension Act 1776

Hi, I noticed your revert on Habeas Corpus Suspension Act 1776. If you take a look at WP:INTDAB you will see why (disambiguation) is included in the wikilink when it is intended to point at the dab page.— Rod ^talk 15:15, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)