User talk:RussianMuslims

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RussianMuslims (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

why i was blocked RussianMuslims (talk) 03:03, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

For sockpuppetry. Max Semenik (talk) 06:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RussianMuslims (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Materialscientist have accused me of being sock. this is not true there is no such sock or anything! i am not sock i should be unblocked! in WP:AAB It says I want to edit Wikipedia, but I keep getting blocked because of others on the same network as me! and explain it as Shared IP addresses such as school and company networks or proxy servers are frequently blocked for vandalism which often affects many innocent editors on the same network which i think is the case for me! what should i do?RussianMuslims (talk) 07:09, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are clearly the same editor as Lmoravidmo. A checkuser has determined that you're technically indistinguishable and your editing pattern alone at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third Rome and Third Rome incriminates you as WP:DUCK. Mkdw ^talk 13:25, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

help[edit]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

what should i do?--RussianMuslims (talk) 03:25, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wait for someone to review your unblock request. Mkdw ^talk 13:18, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And it has and it's been declined. If you still wish to genuinely contribute to Wikipedia, I suggest you come back in 6 months and request WP:OFFER. Anything before that will likely result in your talk page privileges being removed. Outside of socking you've resorted to edit warring and disruption such as removing !votes in AFD discussions in an AFD that you nominated. Mkdw ^talk 13:27, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RussianMuslims (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

it has and it's been declared that i am clearly NOT the same editor as Lmoravidmo You yourself said here that A checkuser has determined that you're technically indistinguishable! so we are NOT THE SAME it is as simple as that. there is no such DUCK or anything! i am not DUCK!, again i clearly declare that i have NO relation with editor Lmoravidmo! just because he agreed with me does NOT mean that we are the same! because in that case editor such as Johnbod and Howicus are also the SAME and DUCK! huh! RussianMuslims (talk) 00:24, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Technically indistinguishable" means there is nothing different between your two accounts from a technical point of view. Further, regardless of whether you're a sock or not, you've been highly disruptive to Wikipedia and your editing history alone would merit an indefinite block. Repeated requests without addressing any of the issues highlighted above may result in a loss of your talk page privileges. Mkdw ^talk 09:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RussianMuslims (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

how does "Technically indistinguishable" means there is nothing different between your two accounts from a technical point of view? Mkdw ^talk Further, i am not disruptive do you have any prove? the only thing i did wrong was edit warring ONCE! RussianMuslims (talk) 16:13, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I suggest you look up "indistinguishable" in the dictionary. You can read more about the check user process at WP:CU. Lastly, there is plenty of evidence in your editing history as well at the AFD. It's also important to note that you SPI file has a long history of disruption as well. At this point I'm getting the feeling we're being trolled here. If not, then WP:COMPETENCE and WP:IDHT are now into consideration. Your talk page privileges are hereby revoked and I suggest you request the standard offer in 6 months assuming you want to genuinely contribute to Wikipedia. Mkdw ^talk 16:56, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2015[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Mkdw ^talk 16:57, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]