User talk:Sandstein

Welcome to my talk page!

Please place new messages at the bottom of this page, or click here to start a new discussion, which will automatically be at the bottom. I will respond to comments here, unless you request otherwise. Please read the following helpful hints, as well as our talk page guidelines before posting:

• Please add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message. This will create an identifying signature and timestamp.

• Do you have a question about arbitration enforcement? Please read my FAQ at User:Sandstein/AE.

• If you're here to inform me of a mistake I made while on administrative duty, please indicate which article is concerned by enclosing the title of the article in two sets of square brackets: [[example article]].

• If you are looking for my talk page's previous contents, they are in the archives.

Start a new talk topic

Chelsea F.C.-Manchester United F.C. rivalry

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am interested in re-creating Chelsea-Manchester United rivalry article, which was deleted by you. I wanted to know why it was deleted and if I can re-create it again with reliable sources?

Thank You! AkephalostheHeadless (talk) 19:07, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Please provide a link. Sandstein 19:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

No consensus DRV

Shouldn't a no consensus DRV for a draftified page be treated similarly to a speedy deletion? I just absolutely fail to see how it's not ready for mainspace now, and that's not the point of draft space. SportingFlyer T·C 21:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

If a DRV ends in no consensus, the AfD closure at issue remains in force by default. Sandstein 07:55, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Mikael Höglund

Hello, since you have decided to redirect the Rusetroy (talk) 11:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC) Mikael Höglund Rusetroy (talk) 11:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC) page to Rusetroy (talk) 11:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC) Thunder Rusetroy (talk) 11:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC) i wish to have the Rusetroy (talk) 11:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC) Mikael Höglund Rusetroy (talk) 11:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC) page deleted since i’m the author/creator of that page.

This makes no sense. Sandstein 13:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Saira Shah Halim

Hi, can you get the article version that was deleted in the recent AfD into draft form? There was a lot of information there. MrMkG (talk) 05:07, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't undelete articles, but you can ask at WP:REFUND. Sandstein 07:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

I looked at the page and I can see respondents just saying "Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion." which is what I assume will happen here.

Even though the the page introduction says post deletion discussion pages can also be granted. But the process that I have witnessed till now, when a perfectly good article got deleted on such flimsy grounds which then no one sought to address properly, there is going to be a snowball's chance in hell that this will be granted.

It's fine you dont have to do anything but don't guide me down a dead end. I just have one question now, say hypothetically this person gets elected later or gets even more coverage at some time (although I am assuming no amount of coverage is sufficient if what is already there isn't), the article would never be created again since it is locked now. How does that work? MrMkG (talk) 19:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

WP:AFC is an option. Sandstein 19:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)