User talk:Schizologien

Welcome![edit]

Hi Schizologien! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kleuske (talk) 12:08, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, I am new on wikipedia. I am learning how it works. Schizologien (talk) 12:13, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Holy Gnostic Church moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Holy Gnostic Church, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources to show notability and support the clais made. . (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kleuske (talk) 11:17, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI, Wikipedia is not itself a reliable source. Tht includes the Portugese Wikipedia. Kleuske (talk) 12:08, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok thank you. Schizologien (talk) 12:15, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Holy Gnostic Church (July 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Gnostic Church, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Holy Gnostic Church and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 12:22, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Schizologien! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 12:22, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gnostic Church has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gnostic Church. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:46, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gnostic Church (Colombia) (July 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Festucalex was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More sources are needed. Please read WP:SIGCOV, edit accordingly, and resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gnostic Church (Colombia) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

〜 Festucalex • talk 18:24, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Holy Gnostic Church[edit]

Hello, Schizologien. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Holy Gnostic Church, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gnostic Church (Colombia)[edit]

Hello, Schizologien. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gnostic Church (Colombia), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

recent edit[edit]

your recent edit added unconstructive and unsourced content to an article.

it was reverted. Augmented Seventh (talk) 03:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is the reality. Please verify before revert. Thanks. Schizologien (talk) 03:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ashtar (extraterrestrial being), you may be blocked from editing. Mr Fink (talk) 06:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 14:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that. It's to early for that information. It's not the moment yet. But remember, before reverting the next time, prove objectively and logically by science and religion that it's False and not True. Schizologien (talk) 15:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ashtar Sheran is an Archetype of the Cosmos, not a person. You cannot incarnate an image of someone. Thank you, Knight. We will see what will happen in the future. If you reverted, it means it was not the moment. English countries are different mentalities than french or german countries. Schizologien (talk) 16:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is written is written. We cannot delete that information. If we forget it, it's false, if we remember it, it's true. Write it in the blockchain. I told. Schizologien (talk) 16:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]