User talk:Seresin/Archive 17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



This page is an archive of User Talk:Seresin (or perhaps something else). If you wish to discuss something here, feel free to bring it up again. The history for this page is here, not on the main talk page. Thanks.
Archives

Until August 2007 September 2007
October 2007 November 2007
December 2007 January 2008
February 2008 March 2008
April 2008 May 2008
June 2008 July 2008
August 2008 September 2008
October 2008 November 2008
December 2008 January 2009
February 2009 March 2009
April 2009 May 2009
June 2009 July 2009
August 2009 September 2009
October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010
February 2010 March 2010
April 2010 May 2010
June 2010 to June 2013
to November 2014

Ratchet Character Page[edit]

I'd like to know why You reverted the changes on my attempted character page for Ratchet (Ratchet and Clank)?? As far as I see all that he is documented in is a brief summary on a character list of the whole series. Doesn't it make sense to have a proper page? I mean Sonic the Hedgehog has a whole character page, so couldn't Ratchet equally qualify for one too? Special Operation (talk) 22:22, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But would You not agree that the main character of a sucessful video games series spanning several games, is notable enough to have good mention? Special Operation (talk) 23:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Enough. Special Operation (talk) 23:39, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you're making many changes to this article. In the future, it is advisable to make all your changes at once, either by working on the article in a subpage of yours, or working on the article directly and saving all your changes at once. Making nearly a hundred discrete edits greatly clogs the edit history when you could make all those changes in one edit. Please consider this in the future. Thank you. seresin ( ¡? ) 23:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Good advice, but I'm not unlike a lot of other editors even if I find some of them just making changes with a priority on racking up as many hits as possible. But the Joseph Cao article is a developing story, with the election going on right now. Otherwise I would try to play more in the sandbox, which is probably a good place for some of the politicos in both Louisiana and New Mexico. Rammer (talk) 23:33, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Rammer (talk) 23:37, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas[edit]

Happy holidays! DavidWS (contribs) 19:45, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thankspam[edit]

Thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which failed with 61/52/7; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral.

Special thanks go out to Wizardman and Malinaccier for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board.

Thanks again for the trust the community has placed in me. A special Christmas song for you all can be found at the right hand side of this message!

Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Dendodge TalkContribs, 17:38, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays![edit]

Anti-Hellenism[edit]

You denied the requested speedy deletion of Anti-Hellenism based on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Hellenism. Could you please check that all these backlinks are removed. Also, see User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise#Anti-Hellenism. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 02:29, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I denied the speedy because it did not meet the criterion: the content was not the content that was deleted as a result of that AfD. seresin ( ¡? )  02:37, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question about Speedy Deletions[edit]

Say there's an article about some animal in some country. It only has one sentence saying "... is a ... found in ...". Would that qualify for a speedy deletion, and under which category? --wj32 t/c 03:31, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would say no. A7 would be the closest, but an animal isn't mentioned, so I don't believe it would qualify. I would prod the article. seresin ( ¡? )  03:33, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You speedy deleted Anthem entertainment, and immediately thereafter Anthem Entertainment was created. Do you know if there is any substantial difference in the two? Thanks. Ward3001 (talk) 00:29, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is not. I elected not to speedy delete it, but you are free to tag it for speedy deletion again, (not under G4, note) and have another administrator look at it. seresin ( ¡? )  00:43, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I'll give it some thought and give the creator some time to improve it. Ward3001 (talk) 00:45, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]