User talk:Sladen/Archives/2021
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your draft article, Draft:Heinrich Detering
Hello, Sladen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Heinrich Detering".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Jack Rickard (engineer)
Hello, Sladen. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jack Rickard (engineer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 06:08, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Lego Quatro
Hello, Sladen. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lego Quatro, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 07:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Tesla battery cells
Hello, Sladen. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tesla battery cells, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Did you get the P6 microcode keys?
That's Peter's patchtools_pub. That should be in the article. Also we now have that 0x0F 0x0E instruction, it should be also added with the link to wikipedia's x86 instruction listings. 109.252.90.66 (talk) 14:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- The, P6/PII/PIII-era keys are now deducible—but that would probably fall under Original Research without a third-party paper to cite;… Ditto for the uarch/Atom instructions in 3DNow! opcode space: needs something published to cite. —Sladen (talk) 20:05, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- There is something at least for 3DNOW, not RS, but very detailed: https://blog.can.ac/2021/03/22/speculating-x86-64-isa-with-one-weird-trick/ As for keys, no need for RS. Code itself is generally recognized as RS, even in politics part of Wikipedia. And here we even have a parser of the RC4 decrypted microcode (descramble AND disassembler, p6tools). We also have first bytes of those 4 byte keys (that is 0x30 0x3A 0x3B 0x17 0x33 0x2E, for 6 keys), which means they should be crackable very fast. The ucode blobs are also available... You can just #define those https://github.com/peterbjornx/patchtools_pub/blob/04bf44e6a3c6f9856c410d6b1f90bbbdba604acf/cpukeys.c#L10 and it will be enough to validate. 109.252.90.66 (talk) 08:14, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- With a bit of optimisation the keys can be obtainable in real-time… (Had not noticed the left-hand side of that screenshot, thank you, and that is a good confirmation/sanity check for those interested in brute-forcing, reduces the search space still further from 32-bits (actually 30-bits) down to 24-bits). Remember: not everyone publishes everything they know—and there are ways and means of being discrete about it. The crypto may be technically sucky, but it was very effective in practice: lasting 25 years! —Sladen (talk) 15:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- So, do you have the keys? I will need to parse layout of scrambled ucode to get plaintext to even start bruteforce. I see you forked it, you know... Peter is now in Intel, so alas. BTW, do you know whether I can use that https://twitter.com/_Dmit/status/1318622847351332864 as plaintext? Of course I do have that nice zip with some ucodes. And one another... Also every key will need its own ucode family. 109.252.90.66 (talk) 21:37, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- With a bit of optimisation the keys can be obtainable in real-time… (Had not noticed the left-hand side of that screenshot, thank you, and that is a good confirmation/sanity check for those interested in brute-forcing, reduces the search space still further from 32-bits (actually 30-bits) down to 24-bits). Remember: not everyone publishes everything they know—and there are ways and means of being discrete about it. The crypto may be technically sucky, but it was very effective in practice: lasting 25 years! —Sladen (talk) 15:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- There is something at least for 3DNOW, not RS, but very detailed: https://blog.can.ac/2021/03/22/speculating-x86-64-isa-with-one-weird-trick/ As for keys, no need for RS. Code itself is generally recognized as RS, even in politics part of Wikipedia. And here we even have a parser of the RC4 decrypted microcode (descramble AND disassembler, p6tools). We also have first bytes of those 4 byte keys (that is 0x30 0x3A 0x3B 0x17 0x33 0x2E, for 6 keys), which means they should be crackable very fast. The ucode blobs are also available... You can just #define those https://github.com/peterbjornx/patchtools_pub/blob/04bf44e6a3c6f9856c410d6b1f90bbbdba604acf/cpukeys.c#L10 and it will be enough to validate. 109.252.90.66 (talk) 08:14, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Lego Quatro has a new comment
Concern regarding Draft:Makita AWS
Hello, Sladen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Makita AWS, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:40, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Makita AWS
Hello, Sladen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Makita AWS".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:21, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Bad Apple!! for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad Apple!! (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
wizzito | say hello! 18:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Lego Quatro
Hello, Sladen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lego Quatro".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:21, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ARDC/AMPRNet pages
Hi, Paul. I’m the new Communications Manager for ARDC. I’d like to thank you for all the work you’ve done on the ARDC/AMPRNet pages. I don’t know if you’ve seen the suggestions I made on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:AMPRNet, but if you have, I'm wondering what you think about them. DanKB6NU (talk) 16:17, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- DanKB6NU/DanRomanchik thanks for the ping: have replied in Special:Diff/1059312834#Suggestions. —Sladen (talk) 19:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)