User talk:Snowleopardxman

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:59, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Don't use user pages as talk pages.
Be civil when using talk pages. This is not civil.
Use article talk pages to discuss articles.
Read WP:EL (esp. WP:FANSITE) and WP:BRD.

I hope that you can continue to contribute to the project, but please realize there are policies and guidelines for the encyclopedia's content. -- JHunterJ (talk) 16:19, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: User talk:Gimmetoo. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Crusio (talk) 16:24, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Kristin Adams, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. -- JHunterJ (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on here everyone. Snowleopardxman seems new to Wikipedia, doesn't seem aware of WP's verifiability policy, and is getting frustrated by the reversions. SLxM, new information should be verifiable to a reliable source in WP-terms, otherwise there is a danger that false information will get seeded onto the internet. I know a few cases of alleged "middle names" added to WP articles that were wrong, but once something stays on WP for a while, it can spread to fansites of the subject and get repeatedly added over and over again for years, even though it is wrong. That's why people here remove stuff that doesn't have good sources. Gimmetoo (talk) 16:43, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, for any other admin who might be tempted, I oppose blocking this user at this time. Snowleopardxman, please bring up the fansite link on Talk:Kristin Adams and see if people agree before attempting to add it again. I am aware the user just added the link again, and I still oppose blocking. Gimmetoo (talk) 16:46, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gimmetoo, I disagree. I have no patience whatsoever with people (new editors or not) that start jelling insults ("dickhead", for example) as soon as they get frustrated. Why can't Snowleopardxman just post a query asking "Why are you deleting my additions"? One more insult like this and I will report this editor to ANI and ask for a block. --Crusio (talk) 16:54, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Mark Zuckerberg has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Wikipelli ^Talk 12:36, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Mark Zuckerberg constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content without explanation. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 12:41, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mark Zuckerberg, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Mark Zuckerberg was changed by Snowleopardxman (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967715 on 2011-01-12T12:44:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:44, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Mark Zuckerberg. Wikipelli ^Talk 12:46, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for vandalism of Mark Zuckerberg. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

-- JHunterJ (talk) 12:49, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FUCK YOU JHUNTER!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Snowleopardxman (talk • contribs) 12:47, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Snowleopardxman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

jhunter is a cock sucker. I did nothing wrong. he just likes stupid fucking jews. Snowleopardxman (talk) 12:51, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nothing in this request gives me any indication that you're interested in editing productively. Note also that additional requests like this will likely result in an indefinite block and the loss of your ability to edit your talk page. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 13:28, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Danish boy[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Danish boy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 16:37, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. You are being reported as vandalizing and attacking other editors. This talk page demonstrates that you are unable and unwilling to adhere to basic principles of civility and the Pillars of Wikipedia. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 13:12, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Courcelles 08:58, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked. If you would like to be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact ArbCom at arbcom-llists.wikimedia.org. Courcelles 09:05, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]