User talk:Stumm24

Regarding Mat Stumm[edit]

Hi there. The content you're posting at Mat Stumm is inappropriate for the Wikipedia article namespace, as it does not appear to comply with Wikipedia's notability policies. Since it appears to be an article about yourself, it may be permissible for you to post that content on your own user page, so long as it complies with Wikipedia's User-Page policies. For your convenience, I have copied the current content of the main article to your user page - if you do not wish it to be there, please add {{db-userreq}} to that page and we can delete it again.

Thanks. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 23:30, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please take the time to read the above policy before trying to recreate your article. Continuing to do so will be considered vandalism and may result in a block. Thanks. Tijuana Brass 23:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to MASH (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 14:04, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Scott Sweesy[edit]

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ninety:one 13:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Mat Stumm[edit]

A tag has been placed on Mat Stumm requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ninety:one 13:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Hillary Rodham Clinton has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Kingpin¹³ (talk) 16:31, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Barack Obama. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. guyzero | talk 16:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]