User talk:Sutoppakaw
May 2021[edit]
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to David Boreanaz. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:44, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
And why do you think that David was born in 1971 I saw his personal history on websites and I saw that he was born in 1969, I didn't see the information that he was born in 1971 If he really born in 1971 Can you show a evidence to make sure that he was born in 1971?
- The reference used in the article is: http://www.filmreference.com/film/5/David-Boreanaz.html. You're welcome to change the year while providing a reliable source to substantiate the change. I'm not saying that Film Reference is necessarily reliable either; I don't know much about it. It's just the site currently being used to source that year. Hope this helps. DonIago (talk) 16:24, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
But most of information I saw that he was born in 1969 I didn't said that your information is not believable but majority of i'm formation said that he was born in 1969 your information kind of minority I think that I should believe in majority not minority and I have evidence I will give you Ex. https://www.upi.com/topic/David_Boreanaz/ https://m.imdb.com/name/nm0004770/ https://astro-charts.com/persons/chart/david-boreanaz/ https://www.astrotheme.com/astrology/David_Boreanaz https://www.astro-seek.com/birth-chart/david-boreanaz-horoscope Sutoppakaw (talk) 12:18, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want more I can give you more Sutoppakaw (talk) 12:29, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- I have my doubts that any of those meet the definition of a reliable source. Several seem to be Astrology-focused, and IMDb isn't reliable per WP:RS/IMDb. The UPI link literally was quoting from Wikipedia. Please review WP:RS to see whether you can find a better source. DonIago (talk) 14:14, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Please do not change the article again without either providing a source when making your change or getting a WP:CONSENSUS for your change. I have explained to you why the edits you're making are problematic, and to continue to reinsert them when they've been challenged is edit-warring and can result in you being blocked from editing. I'm happy to work with you to find an appropriate source and otherwise work through this, but you need to stop trying to force your edits through, especially without providing a source. Thank you for understanding. DonIago (talk) 14:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Why you don't believe this information that I give to you? But you believe your information that you find Sutoppakaw (talk) 17:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
I don't want to quarrel with you, but I want to talk for cause and effect.
Sutoppakaw (talk) 17:32, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
By the way I happy to work with you too Sutoppakaw (talk) 17:35, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
You you have changed the birth information from 1969 to 1971 but some people have changed back to 1969 again but I confirm that I didn't change it. Sutoppakaw (talk) 17:41, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- It's not a matter of whether I believe you. It's a matter of you failing to provide a reliable source, which is needed to satisfy Wikipedia's verifiability policy, especially with regards to biographies of living people. If Boreanaz was truly born in '69, I would think it wouldn't be very difficult to find a source that states that. If there's no source that states his year of birth one way or another, we could delete it entirely until a source can be located. DonIago (talk) 21:41, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
OK I understand Thanks Sutoppakaw (talk) 05:56, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
if you think that your information is correct you can change it. Sutoppakaw (talk) 05:57, 22 May 2021 (UTC)