User talk:ToadetteEdit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to my user talk page. Here, you can post to me anything, reminding that Wikipedia is not like Messenger or WhatsApp. Sign your post using four tlides (~~~~) after each message. If I post something to you, comment there, and leave a {{talkback}} template here. After leaving the message, consider watching this page or subscribing the thread to stay updated. Inappropriate messages will be removed without notice. Stale discussions older than 7 days will be archived by a bot. When leaving messages, please do not ping me here (see this page for more info), as I will continue to be alerted by the system.
You are new? Consider using Wikipedia's introduction to start your editing journey. All questions are welcome here, or at the Teahouse. For editors with drafts, I am happy to review your drafts by just asking me.
A note to editors: Please do not use the rollback feature except reverting vandalism. All reverts must specify why the revert was made. Please leave discussions intact unless it is a personal attack.
Threads starts below. Also note that these threads may be newsletters, especially from The Signpost

Draft:Krishnamma (film)[edit]

Hi @ToadetteEdit, could you please review this page Draft:Krishnamma (film). RadisonRathod (talk) 17:58, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will review it soon. ToadetteEdit! 08:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thankyou. RadisonRathod (talk) 11:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, @RadisonRathod, I know you're just trying to be polite, but you don't need to refer to anyone here with an honorific, and it's a bit frustrating for those of us who are women when people assume everyone here is a man. Valereee (talk) 15:17, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ToadetteEdit @Valereee Sorry. RadisonRathod (talk) 15:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No worries! We know there are places where the use of honorifics is necessary to sound polite, and that that's all you were trying to do. English wikipedia isn't one of those places. Valereee (talk) 15:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Got it @Valereee, I will keep it in mind. Thankyou! RadisonRathod (talk) 15:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @ToadetteEdit, Kindly look into this. Im Just reminding! RadisonRathod (talk) 17:17, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
RR, that draft was just declined yesterday. It can take months for a draft to be re-reviewed. Valereee (talk) 18:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of battles in Croatia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of battles in Croatia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of battles in Croatia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

NLeeuw (talk) 22:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nederlandse Leeuw, can you please explain why did you add this, provided that the AfD page isn't created yet? ToadetteEdit! 06:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ToadetteEdit The AFD was created. Your user talk page just needed cache purged. -- ferret (talk) 13:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for Earl George article[edit]

Hello, my article article about Earl George was declined on the grounds that the subject is not notable enough. I have added more reliable sources to show the subject's notability. However, I believe that the original sources were reliable and showed notability, especially the sources from the Seattle Civil Rights and Labor History Project, the Communism in Washington State History Project, and the finding aid to his papers. These are all independent sources that are part of a larger social history research project by the University of Washington and meet the Wikipedia reliability guidelines. Mathieulalie (talk) 16:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mathieulalie, the reason for my decline is that other than the first and second references, the sources does not discusses the subject in depth Two sources would make the article to be weak in the field of notability. I suggest you add another one or two so that the topic would hopefully be suitable for inclusion to Wikipedia. Hope that helps! ToadetteEdit! 16:43, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Wikipedia notability guidelines state that there must be multiple sources about the subject that meet the Wikipedia reliability guidelines. You have already stated that there were two references that met the requirements for both reliability and in-depth coverage. My draft does not contain any original research. Is there a new rule that there must be more than two reliable sources? In the past, I have always been told by other reviewers that two sources is sufficient. There are also other reliable sources in the article that discuss certain parts of George's life, which I believe further supports his notability. Mathieulalie (talk) 17:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is not mandatory to have more than two sources, but I speculate that it may be taken to AfD. I am not declining because of only two sources in the draft. You can resubmit it and it will be accepted. ToadetteEdit! 17:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Toadette, from one AfC reviewer to another, you gave a poor decline. You added stating that All biographies must be cited to a source or otherwise it will be removed (see the policy on biographies of living people), presumably in reference to WP:BLPREMOVE, but the draft has ten cited sources, which is an entirely reasonable amount relative to its length. Certainly, none of the information in the draft can be considered "contentious material", which is what BLPREMOVE covers. Mach61 16:55, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mach61, I understood. I did this with the other. I'll be more careful of this; it should have been accepted anyways. Can you please explained by contentious materiaĺ? ToadetteEdit! 17:14, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ToadetteEdit "Contentious" isn't formally defined, but it is usually interpreted to mean information that has been disputed by another editor, or is very likely to be, due to containing being a controversial claim. Mach61 17:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Thankyou for the immense contributions. RadisonRathod (talk) 05:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Krishnamma (film)[edit]

Hi @ToadetteEdit, Can you please mark this page Krishnamma (film) as reviewed. So that i would appear on google as well. RadisonRathod (talk) 17:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will let another one review it, as my reviews on films has attracted complaints. ToadetteEdit! 17:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your close at The Color of Crime[edit]

Hi Toadette, I wanted to drop you a note to see if you’d consider reverting your close and re-listing at Talk:The_Color_of_Crime_(book)#Requested_move_2_May_2024. The requested move was first posted May 2 so it was technically old enough to be eligible for closure, but if you look more closely at the timestamps, it was posted to two different wikiprojects at 2:20 May 9, and all of the discussion happened very shortly after that. I think Wikiexplorationandhelping ought to have re-listed it when notifying wikiprojects. If you’d consider re-opening it, I have some responses I’d like to make to Camerone Dewe’s argument (which pushed me to an oppose), and I think it’s possible that more participants from the wikiprojects will want to weigh in. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 18:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's going on with Moriori Enslavement[edit]

Hello. I wanna know do I have to do more with the Moriori Enslavement article? I thought I would've gotten a notification about it by now. I51iM (talk) 16:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Hi @I51iM, you need to click the blue resubmit button in the decline notice to submit it for review. S0091 (talk) 16:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay I resubmitted. I51iM (talk) 16:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Samuel Richards (Ironmaster)[edit]

Hello! I noticed that my Wiki page was declined for lack of reliable sources. I just wanted to ask if there were certain sources I listed that were inadequate? All be it, many of the sources I had are from a book on the said individual, that has not been made available online by the publisher, however it is a very reliable resource.

Thank you!

~~~~Decifix Decifix (talk) 00:11, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 20:41:24, 11 May 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Eisbergsk[edit]



Eisbergsk (talk) 20:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your reply. I will continue to update all the sources I can to archive locations. Our local library just finished archiving all of the Regina Leader Post newspapers from 1909. Because I don't know, I have to ask - if I cannot find an archive location, where do I post the jpeg of the source? Do I create a gallery in my article itself? Sorry, such a newbie! Once I finish updating the sources that I can, did you mean you want me to post the remaining links in here for you? Again, sorry, such a newbie. Again, thank you so very much for your help. Eisbergsk (talk) 20:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

Hello, could you review the Draft:Battle of Samtredia article, as well as some other drafts (Draft:Battle of Gochouri, Draft:Battle of Akhaltsikhe (1444), Draft:Siege of Shamkor)? Thank you.

Concern regarding Draft:Cairo Metro Line 4[edit]

Information icon Hello, ToadetteEdit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cairo Metro Line 4, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Harerge (21:50, 13 May 2024)[edit]

Thanks --Harerge (talk) 21:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]