User talk:Tomabird

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hallo Tomabird, Thanks for your nice message and interesting input. You will not be surprised to hear that I largely disagree with you! Although non-essentialism is indeed a very prevalent teaching within Buddhism, it is one which is resisted - indeed opposed - by the Buddha in the Tathagatagarbha sutras. That is perhaps why these sutras have been so controversial for many hundreds of years! But they do in fact teach (specifically the Nirvana Sutra) of the eternal, immutable Buddha (and the Buddha-dhatu) as that which is the eternal, changeless, sovereign Self of the Buddha. This is indeed presented as "the real Truth" (there are, after all, the doctrines of relative truth and Ultimate Truth - and an "upaya" does not by any means automatically mean that what it teaches is ultimately untrue!). So I think it is quite acceptable in this context to deploy the word "Self". Perhaps we could also add, though, that this doctrine is not universally accepted within the Mahayana and has always been an area of vigorous debate (to reflect your own unease and that of many other Buddhists). My position on the use of the word "Self" in the "Transcendental Immanence" (or, as you say, the reverse!) section is that if it is good enough for the Buddha to use it (in a very positive, cataphatic sense), then it is good enough for us to use it too - especially when we are quoting him! The quote you yourself give relates to the ordinary ego, the worldly self - which is indeed rejected as "a lie" by the Buddha in the Nirvana Sutra. But the Self of Buddha is beyond counting (1,2, 3, etc.) and beyond comprehension (it is acintya - incomprehensible). Also, one has to take the totality of the Mahaparinirvana Sutra in its three main versions to see what the fundamental doctrines of that scripture are. The key point is that the Buddha is eternal and unchanging and that the indestructible Tathagatagarbha / Buddha-dhatu is present within all beings. This is repeatedly referred to as "the (True) Self". Anyway, I appreciate your kind comments and suggestions, even though I don't quite share your stance. I've posted a litle reply to you (I have not mentioned you by "name"!) on the Mahayana discussion page. All best wishes to you. Yours, Tony. TonyMPNS 11:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nirvana Sutra[edit]

I am endeavouring to progress cited scholarship on the Nirvana Sutra page as per Wikipedia guidelines. Uncited information from the main page has been transferred to the talk page. If you could please duly cite this information and transfer it back to the main page it would be most appreciated.
Blessings in the Mindstream
B9 hummingbird hovering (talkcontribs) 07:54, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of political ideologies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antifa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of political ideologies, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Communist Party of Turkey and Communism in Germany (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of political ideologies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Absolutism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of political ideologies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page International Conference of Marxist–Leninist Parties and Organizations (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Tomabird. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of political ideologies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Communist Cambodia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of political ideologies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neo-völkisch movements.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]