User talk:Victory to the UAW

December 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Trieste, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 18:17, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi - look, just saying that the content is biased isn't enough of an explanation. You are currently edit warring, which will likely see your account blocked. Use the article talk page, and explain what is wrong with the content and/or sourcing. Girth Summit _(blether) 19:13, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

i did again it is clearly biased and because you know you will lose the argument here the whole "occupation" thing is contrary to the facts of what occured it was a liberation if we did this qould we also refer to it as the american occupation of dacau death camp this quote contributes nothing and is incredibly biased and the whole thing reaks of italian facist talking points, concentration camps? Please give me a break this is NOT TRUE please REFER THIS TO A MODERATOR ABOVE YOURSELF Victory to the UAW (talk) 12:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

February 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Elephant. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 16:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)