Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Isabeau of Bavaria/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 10:01, 15 April 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Isabeau of Bavaria[edit]

Nominator(s): Truthkeeper (talk) 21:32, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured article because it's an interesting story about a French queen, married to Charles VI of France, who went mad. Isabeau navigated factionalism that resulted in a civil war. Thanks to Ceoil for copyedits and a push to finish this. Thanks to all the reviewers as well. Truthkeeper (talk) 21:32, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: at present the prose has too many errors to meet the FA standard. At a quick read-through of this – very interesting – article I spotted: "grandaughter," "interwined," "tableau vivants," "fleurs-des-lys," "propanda," "daughin," "by a a woman," "Isabeau and Orlean's," and "where the became the prioress"; I have no doubt missed others. I think the text needs a careful review before the article can be considered for FA. – Tim riley (talk) 10:26, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment for delegates:

Okay, thanks Tim. In that case I'll ask the delegates to close/remove. I was hasty. Truthkeeper (talk) 12:21, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Additional note: given the edits to the article since the nomination, the tagging, swapping of images, reverts, changing of formatting, etc., I have to say it's definitely not stable and the nomination should be closed. This in addition to Tim's comments above. In other words, it's a piece of crap. Truthkeeper (talk) 22:40, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Ian Rose (talk) 01:07, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.