Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/November (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November (film)[edit]

Self-nomination. Was on peer review here, and concerns about the length of the plot synopsis have been addressed. While the film itself may not have been released so long ago, I believe that the article is as strong as other featured articles about big (as well as small) screen productions. Extraordinary Machine 04:22, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. I'm always impressed to see so much info on something I haven't even heard of before. Everyking 04:52, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: You might add some sort of short intro to the Cast section, mentioning any casting problems, or break-out roles, or anything else worth mentioning to keep the section from just being a list. — BRIAN0918 • 2005-10-27 05:26
    • I couldn't find any information titbits about the casting of the film (other than Courteney Cox, and that's already mentioned in the "Development" section), or anything that suggested that cast members other than Cox had their careers changed somehow by their participation in the film. I could include quotes from critics about their performances, but that may look odd when there are reviews quoted further down the article, and also not all the performances were commented on by anybody (particularly Nick Offerman and Matthew Carey). I've removed the "Cast" section entirely and fleshed out the lead section of the article a little, to include a mention of Matthew Carey (this is similar to the layout of Sunset Boulevard (1950 film) in terms of mentions of the cast). Extraordinary Machine 13:51, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. But please expand the cast section as per brian above. --PamriTalk 10:33, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I love the attention you showed the plot, very well written had me in suspense waiting for the ending and then it just stopped, now that is what I call A grade material. Also I appecriate your use of the screen shots from right to left helps the article flow smoothly because it is a rather long read. KnowledgeOfSelf 17:19, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. It's a great film, and a great article. Certainly deserving of featured article status. --Winnermario 01:55, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Haven't seen the movie, but this looks like outstanding work. --ausa کui × 09:56, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support could use a grammar punctuation check, I saw a few sloppy sentances.  ALKIVAR 06:19, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks. The problem is, I read this article so many times while editing it that my mind kind of went blank in regards to its smaller problems. Don't worry, though, I'll take another look at it sometime today (hopefully!). Extraordinary Machine 13:16, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Great movie article. And also is well-sourced. Carioca 03:24, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]