Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Peer review

Peer review[edit]

Article is no longer a featured article.

Fails criterion 2(c) - Un-referenced. Fails criterion 2(b) - not comprehensive (one section is actually a stub). «LordViD» 14:13, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Remove per nom. There's also a link-farm at the bottom, but that's a rather minor issue in comparison. —Kirill Lokshin 14:24, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per nom. Johnleemk | Talk 18:28, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per nom. Needs to be peer reviewed. (Sorry, I couldn't help it!) *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 14:56, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Tobyk777 21:24, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Remove — the external links section needs a major cleanup. --zenohockey 00:05, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]