Wikipedia:Featured article review/WGA screenwriting credit system/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed 16:42, 27 January 2007.
WGA screenwriting credit system[edit]
Review commentary[edit]
- Messages left at Filmmaking and PedanticallySpeaking. Gzkn 07:20, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No inline citations at all, even though there are many direct quotes. Lead is probably inadequate (three sentences). However, there is a list of References, so hopefully this one can be saved. Gzkn 07:20, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I agree with Gzkn. No inline citations, the "examples" section should probably be prosified (and even then there might be too many examples), the picture lacks a fair use rationale (I'm not even sure if its use in the article counts as fair use), and the points that Gzkn raised. If the references are revisited by someone who has access to them and converted to inline cites, then that would be a big step forward. Green451 02:33, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, two edits since nom, no progress. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:33, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary[edit]
- Suggested FA criteria concerns are citations (1c) and LEAD (2a). Marskell 21:13, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove Needs inline citations. LuciferMorgan 02:34, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove seriously undercited. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.