Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Lake Como

Reason: I think it's wonderful: it provides a full view of the three branches of Lake Como (so it's encyclopaedic) but is also aesthetically pleasant, due to the perfect weather conditions. No manipulations.
Articles this image appears in: Lake Como
Creator: it:Utente:Marcus90

Support as nominator Marcus90 (talk) 15:49, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose badly artifacted and rather washed out. Clegs (talk) 15:56, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Clegs, plus its only been in an article for 3 days. Mfield (talk) 15:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose, nice picture but too bright. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{round of applause} 21:05, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose a bit too much fog in the image. Ilikefood (talk) 22:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose by Clegs and Mfield. —αἰτίας •discussion• 16:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose Good image but not featured article material in my opinion. Samasnookerfan (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose per Clegs. Juliancolton (Talk) 17:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Dengero (talk) 10:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]