Wikipedia:Peer review/Boxing/archive1

Boxing[edit]

The boxing article is very long and was completely unreferenced until I spent some time on it. It is still poorly written and the sub sections are jumbled. The section explaining different punches and defense is pretty good and the history of olympic and professional boxing is readable. The rest of the article however needs serious attention, esp. the modern history of boxing which is a string of random sentences. Andman8 22:20, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Andy _t 23:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It can be improved by reducing links to solitary years. A monobook tool allows this to be done with one click on a 'dates' tab in edit mode. You can then accept or reject the changes offered and/or do more editing before pressing 'Save'. Simply copy the entire contents of User:Bobblewik/monobook.js to your own monobook. Follow the instructions in your monobook to clear the cache (i.e. press Ctrl-Shift-R in Firefox, or Ctrl-F5 in IE) before it will work. Hope that helps. bobblewik 16:54, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]