Wikipedia:Peer review/Joy Division/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Joy Division[edit]

I've been working on this article with User:Ceoil since late summer with the goal of having it reach FA status by October. Uh, then we both got really busy. Despite the delays, we're pretty far along now and hope to have it at FAC soon. I've listed this article for peer review because I want some feedback, particularly about the grammar. Virtually all sources on the band have been consulted, so there's little that can be added to the bio.

Thanks,

WesleyDodds (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 12:42, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comments I'll leave comments here as I find time to, so feel free to keep this PR on your watch list. Comments;
  • "Curtis's suicide "made for instant myth".[35]" This isn't opinion, but is the opinion of Simon Reynolds. The opinions of critics have been attributed elsewhere in the paragraph, and so this opinion should be attributed. LuciferMorgan (talk) 11:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Two biopics have been released that dramatise Joy Division on film. 24 Hour Party People (2002) presented a somewhat fictionalised account of the rise and fall of the Factory Records, in which the members of Joy Division served as supporting characters." - Has there been any critical commentary on the portrayal of Joy Division in this movie? May be good to check reviews of the film. LuciferMorgan (talk) 11:44, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]