Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Kurdistan/Participants

Coordinator and his/her assistants

Dear Members,

I am writing about the coordinator position in our project. I am not sure if we need an coordinator now, or do we? I mean we can all do what the coordinators do, bring more people in. Thus, if obviously it isn't against Wiki rules, let's not have a coordinator for now until we really need one. For now, I will remove the coordinator(s) please don't hesitate to write back your thoughts.

Thanks,

--Ozgur Gerilla 19:18, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

You are right.. WP Turkey never even had a coordinator as far as I can remember!! As you said, most editors can do what a "coordinator" would do, or if there are issues, the talk page can be used.. Baristarim 19:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Well that is not problem for me too.. If the members want and decide this, we must do this then. --Bohater 21:21, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

We can have a list of active maintainers of the project, I don't think Mustafa akalp will do though no offense regarding your edits to Kurdish related articles, Turkish is better excluding POV additions. Artaxiad 02:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Only one project in Wikipedia has an official coordinator I think: WP:MILHIST. If the project expands and an official co-ordinator needs at a certain point to be elected, then we'll see.--Yannismarou 13:51, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Non active "Participants"

There are many non-active participants listed as participants, whose last edit is from years ago, in some cases even more than a decade ago. I suggest we take those profiles out of the list of participants, who were not active in wikipedia (at all) for longer than a year, so we know better who is actually active in Project:Kurdistan. What do you think? Best, Lean Anael (talk) 06:42, 15 March 2019 (UTC)