User:Keeper76/dashboard
| userpage | talk | dashboard | rfa | contribs | subpages | freqtemps | afd/o | archive |
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
Administrative backlog
WP:AIV
AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
Bot-reported
- Amogh Tripathi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Akinator was changed by Amogh Tripathi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954822 on 2024-05-31T19:03:28+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 19:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Artarium (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- 2001:fd8:1807:246b:c580:b42f:c2ed:f5a1 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 249 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user conducting large scale reverts, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:11, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- 103.224.92.98 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Bhavesh pakhar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- 89.199.69.239 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1233 five times in the last 5 minutes (Long string of characters with no punctuation or markup, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- 2a00:23c5:6495:e401:f91a:876c:8352:a9c2 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- 2A02:C7C:F118:A100:99A5:8F2A:37CF:6CBE (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. Likely LTA. Please fully block /64 range (/32 range is already partially blocked). Air on White (talk) 03:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: 2A02:C7C:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 is currently partial blocked. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 03:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
CSD / PRODs
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 2 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 1 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 0 |
| Other candidates | 6 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 7 items
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 24 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item
Requested RD1 redactions – 11 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
WP:UAA / WP:RFPP
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
Bot-reported
- Melvinroysarmientoeledana (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- DMSTSEditing (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Username indicates an organisation. Suspected UPE. Requested declaration. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 06:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- U8 CASINO (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Appears to be the name of a company. Tacyarg (talk) 09:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Tantilly happy retro dresses (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 11:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
IF (film)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mike Allen 22:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 10:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Bud Spencer
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is the target of an Italian IP hopper who likes to pretend deceased actors aren't really dead. Skywatcher68 (talk) 23:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 10:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
List of presidents of Israel
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 48JCLTALK 00:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Doesn't seem to be affected much in the past. Setting to one year first. – robertsky (talk) 10:45, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
John Spencer (military officer)
Temporary extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. The "Opinions on Israeli invasion of Gaza" section has seen repeated IP edits regarding the characterization of his views as controversial. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 00:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 10:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Cushitic-speaking peoples
Reason: IP editor & another editor have been edit-warring for eleven days. I encouraged them to discuss on Talk. IP editor is not happy with input of other editors & has returned to edit warring. Pathawi (talk) 01:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
John Spencer (military officer)
Reason: IP edit warring over content that falls under WP:PIA and hence requires ECP. John Spencer has been in the news because of his opinions on the Israel-Hamas war. VR (Please ping on reply) 01:36, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 10:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Insurgency in Punjab, India
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced information. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 01:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 10:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Elliana Walmsley
Persistent Violations of the Biographies of Living Persons and Vandalism at the same time: The same I.P. as last time (who is likely a sockpuppet) vandalized the page and changed the national of Walmsley to Greek, and in the Infobox. They keep doing this. They have done this at least 5 or times, I think it's best to indef-semi-protect or pending changes protect. And please, PLEASE, I beseech you to block the person who is changing the nationality. 70.50.199.125 (talk) 01:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Prior semi-protections failed to stop vandalism after protection ends. Seems like there are still useful edits from anon editors. – robertsky (talk) 11:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Example Article Name
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Yogi Anuj Goswami (talk) 06:32, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, wrong target page, but judging from the reqeuster's contribution history, Jogi (caste) looks like the article they are requesting for. which also has not enough disruptive activities yet. – robertsky (talk) 10:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
2024 Mannheim stabbing
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from User:SelfStarter2, reverted 2 edits. F3ew (talk) 07:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @F3ew warning to the editor on their talk page may be more appropriate for now. – robertsky (talk) 10:26, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Will try warning but given the history of 'vandalism' tags on their contributions page, I'm not very hopeful that it will work. – F3ew 11:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
List of characters in Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai
Reason: Indefinite Semi-Protection: persistent vandalism since previous protections expired, constant tampering with main cast Imsaneikigai (talk) 10:09, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Israel-Hamas War
I would like to request that... (the map be updated to show that Israel now controls the entire Gaza-Egypt border) . LordOfWalruses (talk) 15:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Daniyal Chaudhary
n March 2024, he was added to the FIA's Provincial National Identification List (PNIL) to prevent him from leaving the country after he was made part of an investigation related to the assassination of Chaudhry Muhammad Adnan, an independent candidate, ran from constituency NA-57 Rawalpindi-VI in the 2024 Pakistani general election.[3] According to media reports, Adnan had political differences with Chaudhary and he had repeatedly expressed concerns about his safety, indicating that he perceived Chaudhary as a threat. Adnan made it explicit that if any harm came to him, he would hold Chaudhary accountable.[4] World No 1 strategist (talk) 23:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 1 protected edit request | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 11:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC) |
| 1 template-protected edit request | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 10:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
RFA= Requests for adminship
|
WP:RFP
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
User:Prince of Erebor
- Prince of Erebor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have created 80 articles, primarily focused on Sinophone cinema and fantasy literature, with 2 currently undergoing GAN. All of my articles have been promptly reviewed, and none of them have been deleted or marked for maintenance. I am requesting autopatrolled rights to alleviate the workload of the patrollers, especially those who actively review film articles and have reviewed the majority of my articles, allowing them to allocate more time to address articles that truly require attention. As a side note, I am a veteran editor with patroller rights on Chinese Wikipedia, having authored over 200 articles, including a dozen featured and good articles. While I fully understand that there are differences in policies and MOS across different Wikipedias, I believe this demonstrates my credibility and knowledge in assessing article quality.— Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 13:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
User:SheriffIsInTown
- SheriffIsInTown (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I frequently create articles on notable subjects, having authored 530 articles, with the majority facing no issues. Only three were deleted, mainly due to changes in election results affecting their notability. I'm requesting autopatroller rights to ease the burden on other editors reviewing my articles and help reduce the backlog of new article reviews. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 23:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
User:MinorProphet
- MinorProphet (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi, I'd like to request Autopatrolled rights, please. A list of articles I created is here, and articles in various states of completion waiting in the wings are here. Cheers, >MinorProphet (talk) 16:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC) MinorProphet (talk) 16:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Eagledj
- Eagledj (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have written 93 articles HERE, mostly music, biographies, golf, history, architecture, and people from Tennessee. I'd like to apply for auto patrolled status. I have done many BLPs including 5 GAs and I am familiar with the guidelines. Thank you.Eagledj (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Eagledj (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Monhiroe
- Monhiroe (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
have created 80 articles and to create more in the future. Monhiroe (talk) 18:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
User:KingEdinburgh
- KingEdinburgh (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I regularly create military bio articles. KingEdinburgh (talk) 05:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
User:HagridLiving
- HagridLiving (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I would like to request to become autopatrolled to simplify the process of creating pages about France and its heritage. HagridLiving (talk) 13:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi HagridLiving, may I ask what you mean by simplification here? Autopatrolled doesn't really make it any easier to create articles. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 17:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Clovermoss, could this perhaps simplify the verification process at the article creation level? Respectfully, HagridLiving (talk) 11:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Not done – Autopatrolled does not simplify the process of creating articles. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 12:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Clovermoss, could this perhaps simplify the verification process at the article creation level? Respectfully, HagridLiving (talk) 11:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
User:TrimmerinWiki
- TrimmerinWiki (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
As part of NPP, I've noticed the high quality work of TrimmerinWiki, with similar supportive statements on their talk page. Their pages are well-developed and researched. Klbrain (talk) 10:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Sanslogique
- Sanslogique (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello. I would like to request Autopatrolled rights on the advice of user Broc, who appreciated my editorial skills. I have created more than 140 articles, mostly music-related. (I also have these rights in Russian Wikipedia.) Sanslogique (talk) 14:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- I stumbled across Sanslogique's music-related articles more than once as part of NPP, and found them of high quality. They show understanding of WP:NMUSIC, their pages are well written and sourced, and I did not see any copyright problems, that's why I suggested them to apply for autopatrolled rights. Broc (talk) 14:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Page mover
User:Digitalspinifex
- Digitalspinifex (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi there,
I'm requesting a trial of page mover permissions for the purpose of page renaming when a round-robin swap is required for article improvement or in order to draft-ify new articles.
Thank you Digitalspinifex (talk) 01:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
User:RowanJ LP
- RowanJ LP (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've created many biographies and have a good understanding of Wikipedia policies. I've fixed vandalism many times and fixed many biography of living persons violations. RowanJ LP (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
User:RITWIK MAHATA
- RITWIK MAHATA (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting for pending changes reviewer rights so that I can review pending changes. Ritwik Mahatat@lk 15:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Imsaneikigai
- Imsaneikigai (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been editing for around 2.5 years now, with specialised focus on field of entertainment. I also often correct typos or do general fixes on articles of various subjects. I have a good knowledge of wikipedia policies and would like to get this pending changes reviewer rights to broaden by experience and get more expertise of Wikipedia. Imsaneikigai (talk) 12:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
User:AnAlpineSymphony
- AnAlpineSymphony (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have read all the articles and tips for reviewing pending edits. I also have a large, significant history of editing many Engkish and Korean articles about Academics, Music theory, etc. AnAlpineSymphony (talk) 05:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. Pending changes is generally for accounts that routinely edit, and with only 18 edits this year, you don't really have much of a track record to look at. I also see that you don't have much recent experience with dealing with vandalism, which is something that is necessary to obtain this right. I suggest waiting some time to establish a track record of editing and properly dealing with vandalism before re-applying. The Night Watch (talk) 15:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
User:AlphaBetaGamma
- AlphaBetaGamma (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've done reverting vandalism (Although I was on a hiatus since Golden Week as the vandal level hit 5) for some months now, with my edits growing over 2000 from 89ish including other works, and I request this permission to help with the works. I understand that I did make a misunderstandment couple of weeks ago and I have revised the guidelines to prevent another instance of that happening. (I've been making sure not to miss placing a uw as well). Not planning to request rollbacker until I stop making accidents. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
User:750h+
- 750h+ (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have made some very high quality articles (Aston Martin DB9 FA and Aston Martin Rapide at FAC) so I am very familiar with what content is reliable and what is not. I have reverted vandalism (in fact, reverting vandalism was the first edit I made) and whenever i seen vandalism, I take extreme pride in reverting it. Best 750h+ 13:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello User:750h+ . Nice seeing you here! From a quick look at your contributions, it seems like you usually don't leave a warning when reverting vandalism nor an semi-automated edit summary. It's very easy to do with tools like WP:Twinkle. Could you start warning editors? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 12:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Boneless Pizza!
- Boneless Pizza! (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have watched listed several article that have been protected as "pending changes" such as Charizard and Woody (Toy Story) and I would love to have an option to accept their edits if its constructive. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 01:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Rollback
User:Myrealnamm
- Myrealnamm (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi there,
I am requesting rollback rights so I can revert vandalism faster. I've been using Twinkle and reverting vandalism for more than a month now and I finally feel like it's the time. Around last month I've requested Rollback rights but it got declined because I had limited experience in reverting vandalism. I now have over 200 mainspace edits, reverting for more than a month now, and only this that might count as edit warring. Having rollback rights would give me access to tools such as AntiVandal which will help me revert vandalism easier. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) 21:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, and yes, constantly warning users about their edits (unless they've vandalized past their fourth or 4im warning, and then I'll go to AIV). Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) 21:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 21:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm concerned by this complaint on your talk page. Do you still think the edit referenced here should have been reverted? Please explain your reasoning. -Fastily 02:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oh. I'll explain that:
- If I recall, what happened was I didn't see their edit summary and I only saw the edits that were blanking content. So, to answer your question, I shouldn't have reverted those edits because there were reasonable explanations for blanking. That was my mistake. Are there any other problems?
- Thanks, Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 12:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't see the explanation and that's how it led to this and this. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 13:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- So help me understand: if you knew you made a mistake, then why did it take 5 days (during which you ignored the IP) and me calling it out here for you to rectify it? -Fastily 20:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
I didn't, I just realized. Sorry for any confusion that I made. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 21:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)What I meant was I didn’t assume good faith and check what the IP was referring to. I will assume good faith even more from now to prevent things like this from happening again. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 21:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)- When in doubt, do not revert. I'd rather that you allow a few bad edits through than inappropriately revert one constructive edit. RC patrol is not a race to see who can revert the most, you should be taking special care with every revert you make. If you're receiving complaints/questions on your talk page, then you need to address these in a timely manner. To be honest, I think you'd benefit from more experience; please spend another month consistently patrolling before reapplying. That said, closing as Not done Fastily 21:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. Thank you! Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 13:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- When in doubt, do not revert. I'd rather that you allow a few bad edits through than inappropriately revert one constructive edit. RC patrol is not a race to see who can revert the most, you should be taking special care with every revert you make. If you're receiving complaints/questions on your talk page, then you need to address these in a timely manner. To be honest, I think you'd benefit from more experience; please spend another month consistently patrolling before reapplying. That said, closing as
- So help me understand: if you knew you made a mistake, then why did it take 5 days (during which you ignored the IP) and me calling it out here for you to rectify it? -Fastily 20:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't see the explanation and that's how it led to this and this. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 13:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm concerned by this complaint on your talk page. Do you still think the edit referenced here should have been reverted? Please explain your reasoning. -Fastily 02:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- FYI I do have an alternate account that I often use, at User:Myrealnamm-alt. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 21:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Ankermast
- Ankermast (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am a German Wikipedian and have been active on enwiki as vandalism fighter since April, mostly using Twinkle sind SWViewer and always warning editors after reverting their contributions. Currently I have made almost 800 Edits here, which mostly consist of vandalism control. On dewiki I am member of the CVU, have more than 17000 edits as well as rollback rights. [2] I would like to be granted rollback rights as they would allow me fighting vandalism more efficiently and faster. Thanks Ankermast (talk) 08:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 20:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- As I am using Twinkle, it becomes clear that the vast majority of my reverts are followed by a warning when looking at my contributions. Regarding your examples: 1. I restored an older version edited by two other users: an anonymous user which I did warn and a user which removed some of the vandalism by the IP, which I would not warn as this edit was constructive. 2. Here, the user removed the contribution by themselves except for a blank which I removed with restoring the latest constructive version. Here, as it seemed like a test edit and as the user removed it, I just removed said blank. 3. Out of hundreds of reverts, there are some cases in which I do not warn the editor. These are natural and I can’t do more than making the promise that like now, I am going to warn every vandal, to the best of my ability.
- Best regards Ankermast (talk) 20:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 21:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Template editor
User:HouseBlaster
- HouseBlaster (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi! I think there are a couple tasks for which I could make good use of this permission. My primary use case is carefully renaming templates so that their names comply with WP:TPN. (You can see a bunch of move requests I have made at WP:RMT.) I also was recently appointed as a trainee clerk for ArbCom (verify) and the other non-admin clerk was granted the perm because it would be useful for clerking. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 03:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Policies and links