User talk:142.189.112.124

June 2023

Hello, I'm Pbritti. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Wikipedia can't cite Wikipedia; see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:52, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at LGBT rights in Ukraine, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. WPscatter ^t/_c 00:00, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:50, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

• You've tried to add your idiosyncratic points to the lead of LGBT rights in Ukraine under multiple IPs. You are now past 3 reverts and will be blocked if you try to restore it without first achieving talk page WP:CONCENSUS for it.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:50, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at Talk:LGBT rights in Ukraine, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. You have been repeatedly told by multiple editors to stop accusing people of vandalism when no evidence exists. Follow Wikipedia's good faith policy. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:29, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

@Pbritti@Ponyo@Wpscatter I have taken every step of good faith. Ask yourselves, did you assume good faith before reverting? Did you ask for updates or simply repeatedly revert back to back even though the issues you mentioned were addressed? Or the reasoning for the formatting had been given and is consistent with Wikipedia Guidance. Repeated reverting content for fixable issues rather than you yourself fixing the issues you see and wish to contribute seems to bring in to question if you are assuming good faith. 142.189.112.124 (talk) 02:23, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Don't ping me again. If you haven't already, notify the other editors that you tagged them in a dispute resolution discussion, as I was not so notified. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:39, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

@Pbritti that is the purpose of tagging is to notify you. You suggested the dispute resolution process. Why are you disappointed that it was used? 142.189.112.124 (talk) 04:04, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

If you ping me again, I'll request that you are blocked for repeated disruptive behavior. Also, I didn't suggest dispute resolution. That was Ponyo. ~ Pbritti (talk) 04:11, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Threatening me while I try to resolve issues is evidence of bad faith. 142.189.112.124 (talk) 04:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 05:10, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

---