User talk:Beshogur/Archive 3

pro-PYD/SDF changes

You can read this topic.link Mehmedsons (talk) 13:11, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

I'm tired of that tbh. Let him do what he wish. Syrian National Resistance does not even exist, he is in his own dream world. Beshogur (talk) 13:52, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Yep you are right! Niele~enwiki not adequate pro-PKK supporter. :) Mehmedsons (talk) 18:20, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

please do not edit article "Battle of Samara Bend" again -

You are reverting CITED references - if you persist, I will file a report against you at ANI. Thanks. You have a history for being blocked for edit warring - I don't think the Admins will take it lightly if you are reported again. 104.169.17.29 (talk) 22:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Name Abu Kamal most common in English language print.

Kindly consider the talk page before reverting changes that have been discussed. Batternut (talk) 18:27, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Bizaah

ISIS againt controlled Bizaah a few hours after the rebels take this town.linklink Mehmedsons (talk) 12:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Notice of WP:1RR violation at Module:Syrian Civil War detailed map and others on Edit warring noticeboard

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --Niele~enwiki (talk) 11:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Beshogur, this is clearly a violation of the 1RR community sanctions at that article, which you are well aware of. I have blocked this account for 72 hours. In the future, please limit yourself to one revert within a 24 hour period; use the talk page to discuss if you have a dispute. Kuru (talk) 12:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Kuru, understood. But you should check Niele's edits on Syrian Civil War Detailed Map template. Cheers. Beshogur (talk) 16:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

stop your edits

stop your blind reverting in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Turkic_dynasties_and_countries.check my removals and edit summaries.none of them were turkic.also there are many other dubious entries in the article.i will remove them for sure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.165.68.147 (talk) 15:20, 1 March 2017 (UTC) do your next revert and i will report you.can't u understand or are you blind?check edit summaries and main article of Avar Khaganate and Bahmani Sultante.they were not turkic.89.165.68.147 (talk) 17:11, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Okay, I understand you know, but why do you have removed Bahmani and Zengid dynasties? Beshogur (talk) 14:15, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

DUDE!USE CTRL+F in your browser and see the zengids! in middle east section!!! zengids is redundant.i only removed the duplicate.how many times i must explain this simple thing in my posts and edit summaries??!!94.176.84.103 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Syrian Civil War map

Re [1]. Why did you change Hutah to opposition held? Erlbaeko (talk) 14:38, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Because you said: "We don't use 'pro-X source' for 'X gains', but seems like an user did same thing, you have reverted my edit several times. Syrian Civil war map is pro-SDF and is very biased, do you have another sources for that? Only SCW map is reporting that. Beshogur (talk) 14:46, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

The rules for editing the map says that, but why did you change Hutah? That village have been under SDF controll for a long time. Did you mean Tal Turin and Qarah? If so this may be a better source. Konstantin Krammer‏ is used as an expert by reliable sources. I believe he is a "a well-known source that has a reputation for neutral (not biased) territorial control coverage". Ok? Erlbaeko (talk) 15:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kilis Province, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afshar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

List of states with limited recognition

I have reverted your recent edits to the List of states with limited recognition. While you are encouraged to be bold in your initial edit, please remember WP:BRD. Discuss controversial edits before reinstating them. I have started a discussion here and I encourage you to participate Talk:List_of_states_with_limited_recognition#Common_Names_vs._Official_Names. Thank you! --HighFlyingFish (talk) 16:47, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Talk page

You are involving in edit war. Use the talk page before reverting without explanation. Ferakp (talk) 15:14, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

List of Turkic dynasties and countries

That was not an unexplained removal, I clearly stated my reasons on my talk page, and asked you for a source(s) that support your edits, which you chose to avoid. --HistoryofIran (talk) 16:41, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Why do you remove the orginal content. You can't remove it because you didn't like it. It's funny how you add these dynasties to List of Iranian dynasties and countries and removing it from List of Turkic dynasties and countries while these dynasties has a Turkic origin. Beshogur (talk) 16:45, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

That's funny, because I haven't added anything to List of Iranian dynasties and countries since 2014, and I have already stated that the article should be deleted. Unlike you, I refrain from pov-pushing. Just because they had a Turkic origin doesn't make them a 'Turkic dynasty' or a 'Turko-Persian/Iranian state'. That is something fictitious which you have come up with, and if you can't come up with a source to support your claims, I will remove the dynasties again. Revert me again after I have removed them, and I will report you. --HistoryofIran (talk) 16:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Why should it be 'fiction' while Persianate society exist, while Turco-Mongol dynasties exist, while Turco-Persian tradition exist. Yes an Iranian Dynasty with Turkic origin does make this dynasty Turkic. They spoke Turkic, and their official language was Turkic. You need source? Open the pages of these Turkic dynasties. And report please. I'm not POV-pushing, you do. Beshogur (talk) 16:56, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Because in reality they are not called for a 'Turkic dynasty' or a 'Turko-Persian/Iranian state', and you clearly know that as well. I am looking at the articles right now, and they're saying the exact opposite of what you are saying. If you're so sure of what you're saying, and that you're not pov-pushing, then surely it should be easy for you to find some reliable sources that support you edits? --HistoryofIran (talk) 17:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Well, look what the article says "The following is a list of dynasties, states or empires which are Turkic-speaking, of Turkic origins, or both." and it says "The following list is of Iranian dynasties of Turkic origin." What's wrong with that? Maybe the word that was used is wrong. But that's a reason to remove, Safavid, Afsharid, Qajar, and Mughal dynasties? According you we should make the whole article blanc. Beshogur (talk) 17:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

So what? This is still a clear pov-pushing attempt, and the article is named List of Turkic dynasties and countries, I don't recall those dynasties being a Turkic one? And no, we shouldn't make the whole article blank, in fact we should delete it along with the Iranian one :P. Also, changing the name of the section to 'Iranian dynasties with Turkic origin' doesn't make it any better, since if they're Iranian dynasties, then what are they doing in a article named 'List of Turkic dynasties and countries'? --HistoryofIran (talk) 17:40, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Well, it's just a wording, why do you take it so serious? And Iranian Dynasties with Turkic origin means it's a Turkic dynasty which rules over Iran. Saying Iranian dynasty to them doesn't make them Persian, so still Turkic. Beshogur (talk) 17:48, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

It's not just a wording, the issue was talked about in the Iranian version of the article as well [2].Well they're not Turkic dynasties, and you still haven't come up with any source to support your claims. I'll wait a little bit longer, and if you haven't come up with anything, I'll remove them. --HistoryofIran (talk) 17:55, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Hmm, ok. What about Mughal dynasty? Isn't Mughals descended from Timurid dynasty? Beshogur (talk) 18:40, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Still not a Turkic dynasty. Also, you still haven't added anything that calls them a 'Turkic dynasty'. --HistoryofIran (talk) 20:39, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

I don't want waste my time. Bye lol. Beshogur (talk) 20:58, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Original Research v Verifiability

Please note the difference between Original Research and Verifiability of information. Original Research is where a user has done their own primary work on a subject or topic. This is different to verifiability which is ensuring that sources used and information in articles is accurate. Not once did I refer to the information in the Islamic terrorism in Europe as Original Research you claimed that I did here. It is also far from a joke that the information in the article is u encyclopedic. The information has been tagged as to the areas where it falls down. The information removed is unverified and is news cruft.The section must only contain information which conforms with Wikipeidia's policies on a Neutral Point of View, Verifiability, No Original Research and Relevance. Sport and politics (talk) 12:57, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Edit Summaries

I would caution you about making statements in edit summaries as these are permanent and cannot be removed after the fact, be careful with what is added as it is permanent. Sport and politics (talk) 12:57, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, my mistake, you didn't vandalise the Marawi crisis page

It was some editor with the IP address. Again, sorry

Warning

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kara Koyunlu, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:15, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Crimean Tatar grammar

Hi, I wonder if you know of any online resources that document Crimean Tatar's noun and verb inflections and conjugations? I just can't seem to find any adequate resource online. Thanks in advance. — AWESOME meeos ！ * ([ˈjæb.ə ət məɪ])) 03:58, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Map

Hi, probably this map is wrong in the north Siberia. Someone claiming to be correcting it (he wrote "fixed north east siberia is non turkic yakut are the most northeastern"), removed Iranian Turkic peoples, but I reverted back.Kavas (talk) 22:57, 31 July 2017 (UTC) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lenguas_t%C3%BArquicas.png

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kirkuk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iraqi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

good source!

True reports! Read.linkandlink Mehmedsons (talk) 10:38, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Beshogur. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)